Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Philosophical Logic

On state transformations induced by yes-no experiments, in the context of quantum logic

Enrico G. Beltrametti, Gianni Cassinelli

Published Jan 1, 1977• 29 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00262074

Related papers

Nonordered quantum logic and its YES-NO representation

Mladen Pavičić

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Sep 1, 1993•14 citations

A note on the so-called yes-no experiments and the foundations of quantum mechanics

�istein Bj�rnestad

Synthese•Dec 1, 1974•2 citations

A Note on the So-Called Yes-No Experiments and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Øistein Bjørnestad

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1976•0 citations

A note on all the so-called yes-no experiments and the foundations of quantum mechanics

O. Bjoernestad

•Jan 1, 1976•0 citations

Intuitionistic Quantum Logic of an n-level System

Martijn Caspers, Chris Heunen, Nicolaas P. Landsman +1 more

A decade ago, Isham and Butterfield proposed a topos-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics, which meanwhile has been extended by Döring and Isham so as to provide a new mathematical foundation for all of physics. Last year, three of the present authors redeveloped and refined these ideas by combining the C*-algebraic approach to quantum theory with the so-called internal language of topos theory (Heunen et al. in arXiv:0709.4364 ). The goal of the present paper is to illustrate our abstract setup through the concrete example of the C*-algebra M n (ℂ) of complex n×n matrices. This leads to an explicit expression for the pointfree quantum phase space Σ n and the associated logical structure and Gelfand transform of an n-level system. We also determine the pertinent non-probabilisitic state-proposition pairing (or valuation) and give a very natural topos-theoretic reformulation of the Kochen–Specker Theorem. In our approach, the nondistributive lattice ℘(M n (ℂ)) of projections in M n (ℂ) (which forms the basis of the traditional quantum logic of Birkhoff and von Neumann) is replaced by a specific distributive lattice $\mathcal{O}(\Sigma_{n})$ of functions from the poset $\mathcal{C}(M_{n}(\mathbb{C}))$ of all unital commutative C*-subalgebras C of M n (ℂ) to ℘(M n (ℂ)). The lattice $\mathcal{O}(\Sigma_{n})$ is essentially the (pointfree) topology of the quantum phase space Σ n , and as such defines a Heyting algebra. Each element of $\mathcal{O}(\Sigma_{n})$ corresponds to a “Bohrified” proposition, in the sense that to each classical context $C\in\mathcal{C}(M_{n}(\mathbb{C}))$ it associates a yes-no question (i.e. an element of the Boolean lattice ℘(C) of projections in C), rather than being a single projection as in standard quantum logic. Distributivity is recovered at the expense of the law of the excluded middle (Tertium Non Datur), whose demise is in our opinion to be welcomed, not just in intuitionistic logic in the spirit of Brouwer, but also in quantum logic in the spirit of von Neumann.

arXiv:0902.3201•Foundations of Physics•Apr 20, 2009•45 citations

A theorem about states on quantum logics

M. S. Matveichuk

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1980•2 citations
A decade ago, Isham and Butterfield proposed a topos-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics, which meanwhile has been extended by Döring and Isham so as to provide a new mathematical foundation for all of physics. Last year, three of the present authors redeveloped and refined these ideas by combining the C*-algebraic approach to quantum theory with the so-called internal language of topos theory (Heunen et al. in arXiv:0709.4364 ). The goal of the present paper is to illustrate our abstract setup through the concrete example of the C*-algebra M n (ℂ) of complex n×n matrices. This leads to an explicit expression for the pointfree quantum phase space Σ n and the associated logical structure and Gelfand transform of an n-level system. We also determine the pertinent non-probabilisitic state-proposition pairing (or valuation) and give a very natural topos-theoretic reformulation of the Kochen–Specker Theorem. In our approach, the nondistributive lattice ℘(M n (ℂ)) of projections in M n (ℂ) (which forms the basis of the traditional quantum logic of Birkhoff and von Neumann) is replaced by a specific distributive lattice O(Σn)\mathcal{O}(\Sigma_{n})O(Σn​) of functions from the poset C(Mn(C))\mathcal{C}(M_{n}(\mathbb{C}))C(Mn​(C)) of all unital commutative C*-subalgebras C of M n (ℂ) to ℘(M n (ℂ)). The lattice O(Σn)\mathcal{O}(\Sigma_{n})O(Σn​) is essentially the (pointfree) topology of the quantum phase space Σ n , and as such defines a Heyting algebra. Each element of O(Σn)\mathcal{O}(\Sigma_{n})O(Σn​) corresponds to a “Bohrified” proposition, in the sense that to each classical context C∈C(Mn(C))C\in\mathcal{C}(M_{n}(\mathbb{C}))C∈C(Mn​(C)) it associates a yes-no question (i.e. an element of the Boolean lattice ℘(C) of projections in C), rather than being a single projection as in standard quantum logic. Distributivity is recovered at the expense of the law of the excluded middle (Tertium Non Datur), whose demise is in our opinion to be welcomed, not just in intuitionistic logic in the spirit of Brouwer, but also in quantum logic in the spirit of von Neumann.