Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Classical Kronig–Penney model

U. Oseguera

Published Feb 1, 1992• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Some discontinuous potentials commonly used in quantum mechanics are briefly considered in order to highlight some unusual conclusions one may draw from the solutions of the associated Schrödinger equation. Classical analogs of these potentials are given; in particular, it is shown that a boundary condition necessary for the quantum system may have physical meaning of its own in the classical counterpart. A classical example of the Kronig–Penney model displaying the appearance of frequency bands, as opposed to the energy bands found in the quantum domain, is also discussed.

DOI
10.1119/1.16929

Related papers

Klein paradox and the Dirac-Kronig-Penney model

Bruce H. J. McKellar, G. J. Stephenson

We analyze the barrier problem and the Kronig-Penney model for Dirac particles, paying attention to the Klein paradox and the nature of the potential. The ambiguities associated with the \ensuremath{\delta}-function limit are examined and the physically reasonable way to include \ensuremath{\delta}-function potentials in the Dirac-Kronig-Penney problem is identified.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 1987•63 citations

On a Parallelism between Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics

Yoshio Nishiyama

Striking parallelism between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics is evidenced for several bound system in a rather general form by introducing reasonably “quantum-mechanical momentum” from the Schrödinger equation. The following are proved: The “quantum-mechanical momentum” which is nearly equal to the corresponding classical momentum in “classical region” can be defined in the whole range of validity of the coordinate for the bound systems. In the same way as in classical mechanics, in quantum mechanics one can construct an associated wave accompanying a motion of a quantum particle and obeying the Schrödinger equation. The uniqueness condition on the associated wave throughout an orbit leads to the boundary condition on the wave function which is composed of the associated wave and to “quantum-mechanical quantization condition”, equivalently. In addition, all these quantum-mechanical quantities are approximately equal to the corresponding classical ones in the “classical region” of the coordinate. In particular it is demonstrated that even for a bound system of a singular (central) potential exists the ground state with the lowest energy eigenvalue. It is proved in one dimension that to any physical system obeying the Schrödinger equation always exists the corresponding classical system.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Aug 1, 1965•0 citations

Wave Mechanics and Its Simple Applications

Ajay Sharma

The Schrödinger equation assumes that a particle behaves as a wave and yields a solution in terms of wave function and the energy of the particle under consideration. Once the wave function is known, then everything about the particle can be deduced from the wave function. This chapter covers the development of the Schrödinger wave equation and its applications to one-dimensional systems. Time-dependent and time-independent Schrödinger equations, bound and scattering states, probability density, probability current and expectation values, the solution of the time-independent 1D-Schrödinger equation for a free particle, infinite as well as finite potential wells, potential steps, and the finite potential barrier are discussed in detail in the chapter. The phenomenon of tunneling, relevance and the importance of the free particle, potential wells and potential barriers to contemporary fields of physics and chemistry, periodic solids and their band structures, the Kronig-Penney model, confined states in quantum wells, and wires and dots are other topics presented in innovative manners in the chapter. The importance of the topics presented here is demonstrated through carefully chosen solved examples and unsolved exercises from contemporary fields of sciences.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 18, 2021•0 citations

Quantum mechanics without potential function

A. D. Alhaidari, M. E. H. Ismail

In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, one starts by proposing a potential function that models the physical system. The potential is then inserted into the Schrödinger equation, which is solved for the wavefunction, bound states energy spectrum, and/or scattering phase shift. In this work, however, we propose an alternative formulation in which the potential function does not appear. The aim is to obtain a set of analytically realizable systems, which is larger than in the standard formulation and may or may not be associated with any given or previously known potential functions. We start with the wavefunction, which is written as a bounded infinite sum of elements of a complete basis with polynomial coefficients that are orthogonal on an appropriate domain in the energy space. Using the asymptotic properties of these polynomials, we obtain the scattering phase shift, bound states, and resonances. This formulation enables one to handle not only the well-known quantum systems but also previously untreated ones. Illustrative examples are given for two- and three-parameter systems.

arXiv:1408.4003•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2015•41 citations

Hamilton-Jacobi Formulation

In the one-dimensional periodic potential case, we formulate the condition of Bloch periodicity for the reduced action by using the relation between the wave function and the reduced action established in the context of the equivalence postulate of quantum mechanics.Then, without appealing to the wave function properties, we reproduce the well-known dispersion relations which predict the band structure for the energy spectrum in the Krönig-Penney model.

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Distribution theory for Schrödinger’s integral equation

Rutger‐Jan Lange

Much of the literature on point interactions in quantum mechanics has focused on the differential form of Schrödinger’s equation. This paper, in contrast, investigates the integral form of Schrödinger’s equation. While both forms are known to be equivalent for smooth potentials, this is not true for distributional potentials. Here, we assume that the potential is given by a distribution defined on the space of discontinuous test functions. First, by using Schrödinger’s integral equation, we confirm a seminal result by Kurasov, which was originally obtained in the context of Schrödinger’s differential equation. This hints at a possible deeper connection between both forms of the equation. We also sketch a generalisation of Kurasov’s [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 201(1), 297–323 (1996)] result to hypersurfaces. Second, we derive a new closed-form solution to Schrödinger’s integral equation with a delta prime potential. This potential has attracted considerable attention, including some controversy. Interestingly, the derived propagator satisfies boundary conditions that were previously derived using Schrödinger’s differential equation. Third, we derive boundary conditions for “super-singular” potentials given by higher-order derivatives of the delta potential. These boundary conditions cannot be incorporated into the normal framework of self-adjoint extensions. We show that the boundary conditions depend on the energy of the solution and that probability is conserved. This paper thereby confirms several seminal results and derives some new ones. In sum, it shows that Schrödinger’s integral equation is a viable tool for studying singular interactions in quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1401.7627•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2015•30 citations
Some discontinuous potentials commonly used in quantum mechanics are briefly considered in order to highlight some unusual conclusions one may draw from the solutions of the associated Schrödinger equation. Classical analogs of these potentials are given; in particular, it is shown that a boundary condition necessary for the quantum system may have physical meaning of its own in the classical counterpart. A classical example of the Kronig–Penney model displaying the appearance of frequency bands, as opposed to the energy bands found in the quantum domain, is also discussed.
Striking parallelism between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics is evidenced for several bound system in a rather general form by introducing reasonably “quantum-mechanical momentum” from the Schrödinger equation. The following are proved: The “quantum-mechanical momentum” which is nearly equal to the corresponding classical momentum in “classical region” can be defined in the whole range of validity of the coordinate for the bound systems. In the same way as in classical mechanics, in quantum mechanics one can construct an associated wave accompanying a motion of a quantum particle and obeying the Schrödinger equation. The uniqueness condition on the associated wave throughout an orbit leads to the boundary condition on the wave function which is composed of the associated wave and to “quantum-mechanical quantization condition”, equivalently. In addition, all these quantum-mechanical quantities are approximately equal to the corresponding classical ones in the “classical region” of the coordinate. In particular it is demonstrated that even for a bound system of a singular (central) potential exists the ground state with the lowest energy eigenvalue. It is proved in one dimension that to any physical system obeying the Schrödinger equation always exists the corresponding classical system.
The Schrödinger equation assumes that a particle behaves as a wave and yields a solution in terms of wave function and the energy of the particle under consideration. Once the wave function is known, then everything about the particle can be deduced from the wave function. This chapter covers the development of the Schrödinger wave equation and its applications to one-dimensional systems. Time-dependent and time-independent Schrödinger equations, bound and scattering states, probability density, probability current and expectation values, the solution of the time-independent 1D-Schrödinger equation for a free particle, infinite as well as finite potential wells, potential steps, and the finite potential barrier are discussed in detail in the chapter. The phenomenon of tunneling, relevance and the importance of the free particle, potential wells and potential barriers to contemporary fields of physics and chemistry, periodic solids and their band structures, the Kronig-Penney model, confined states in quantum wells, and wires and dots are other topics presented in innovative manners in the chapter. The importance of the topics presented here is demonstrated through carefully chosen solved examples and unsolved exercises from contemporary fields of sciences.
In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, one starts by proposing a potential function that models the physical system. The potential is then inserted into the Schrödinger equation, which is solved for the wavefunction, bound states energy spectrum, and/or scattering phase shift. In this work, however, we propose an alternative formulation in which the potential function does not appear. The aim is to obtain a set of analytically realizable systems, which is larger than in the standard formulation and may or may not be associated with any given or previously known potential functions. We start with the wavefunction, which is written as a bounded infinite sum of elements of a complete basis with polynomial coefficients that are orthogonal on an appropriate domain in the energy space. Using the asymptotic properties of these polynomials, we obtain the scattering phase shift, bound states, and resonances. This formulation enables one to handle not only the well-known quantum systems but also previously untreated ones. Illustrative examples are given for two- and three-parameter systems.
Much of the literature on point interactions in quantum mechanics has focused on the differential form of Schrödinger’s equation. This paper, in contrast, investigates the integral form of Schrödinger’s equation. While both forms are known to be equivalent for smooth potentials, this is not true for distributional potentials. Here, we assume that the potential is given by a distribution defined on the space of discontinuous test functions. First, by using Schrödinger’s integral equation, we confirm a seminal result by Kurasov, which was originally obtained in the context of Schrödinger’s differential equation. This hints at a possible deeper connection between both forms of the equation. We also sketch a generalisation of Kurasov’s [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 201(1), 297–323 (1996)] result to hypersurfaces. Second, we derive a new closed-form solution to Schrödinger’s integral equation with a delta prime potential. This potential has attracted considerable attention, including some controversy. Interestingly, the derived propagator satisfies boundary conditions that were previously derived using Schrödinger’s differential equation. Third, we derive boundary conditions for “super-singular” potentials given by higher-order derivatives of the delta potential. These boundary conditions cannot be incorporated into the normal framework of self-adjoint extensions. We show that the boundary conditions depend on the energy of the solution and that probability is conserved. This paper thereby confirms several seminal results and derives some new ones. In sum, it shows that Schrödinger’s integral equation is a viable tool for studying singular interactions in quantum mechanics.