Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Some general commutation rules and identities for three-dimensional quantum-mechanical operators

Edgardo T. García Alvarez, Alejandro D. González

Published Oct 1, 1989• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A general proof of several formulas used in three-dimensional quantum problems is presented. By considering the two vector operators A and B having Cartesian components that satisfy the canonical commutation relations—as the position and momentum operators do—we obtain commutation rules and relations for the projection onto each another. All of these rules and relations have symmetry under A↔B exchange. This symmetry suggests, in the particular case of position and momentum operators, a new operator, the projection of r onto p, which seems to be useful in dissipative quantum problems.

DOI
10.1119/1.15848

Related papers

Canonical Transformations and Spectra of Quantum Operators

Boris Leaf

The claim that unitary transformations in quantum mechanics correspond to the canonical transformations of classical mechanics is not correct. The spectra of operators produced by unitary transformation of Cartesian coordinate and momentum operators (q, k) are necessarily continuous over the entire real domain of their eigenvalues. Operators with spectra which are not everywhere continuous are generated from (q, k) by one-sided unitary transformations U for which U†U = 1 but for which UU† commutes with either q or k (but not both). If UU† commutes with k, the new coordinates and momenta (r, s) satisfy commutation relations [sm, rn] = 2πi1δm,n, [sm, sn] = 0, but [rm, rn] ≠ 0; (r, s) are canonical only for one-dimensional systems. The properties of one-sided unitary transformations are described; they are characterized by φ(K), the eigenvalue of UU†. The one-dimensional case for which the one-sided unitary transformation is canonical is discussed in detail. A prescription is given for obtaining the operator canonically conjugate to any one-dimensional observable. Generalization to higher dimensions is also discussed.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1969•35 citations

An Alternative Commutation Relation Between Position and Momentum Operators of Massless Particles

H. Razmi

It seems that the problem of finding a suitable position operator for photon has been solved in a recently published work which is based on a new commutation relation between position and momentum operators of massless particles[1]. Although the authors of [1] have presented a classical reasoning in favour of the new commutator,here we are going to find this new commutator based on a quantum mechanical argument.

arXiv:quant-ph/9811071•Nov 25, 1998•0 citations

Derivation of the coordinate-momentum commutation relations from canonical invariance

Moshe Shapiro

Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value $ih$ where $h$ is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.

Physical Review A•Oct 31, 2006•5 citations

From quantum field theory to quantum mechanics

Nuno Barros e Sá, Cláudio Gomes

Abstract The purpose of this article is to construct an explicit relation between the field operators in Quantum Field Theory and the relevant operators in Quantum Mechanics for a system of N identical particles, which are the symmetrised functions of the canonical operators of position and momentum, thus providing a clear relation between Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics. This is achieved in the context of the non-interacting Klein–Gordon field. Though this procedure may not be extendible to interacting field theories, since it relies crucially on particle number conservation, we find it nevertheless important that such an explicit relation can be found at least for free fields. It also comes out that whatever statistics the field operators obey (either commuting or anticommuting), the position and momentum operators obey commutation relations. The construction of position operators raises the issue of localizability of particles in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, as the position operator for a single particle turns out to be the Newton–Wigner position operator. We make some clarifications on the interpretation of Newton–Wigner localized states and we consider the transformation properties of position operators under Lorentz transformations, showing that they do not transform as tensors, rather in a manner that preserves the canonical commutation relations. From a complex Klein–Gordon field, position and momentum operators can be constructed for both particles and antiparticles.

arXiv:2107.11724•The European Physical Journal C•Oct 1, 2021•4 citations

Quantization of three-dimensional space

Boris Leaf

Geometrical properties of space are described by relations between quantum observables, functions of generalized coordinate and momentum operators of a physical system. Space comprises the set of eigenvalues of the coordinate observables, which may be a discrete set of points instead of the continuum of classical geometry. Differentiation on coordinates and momenta is defined by commutation operations. Well-known formulas from classical geometry for gradient and divergence operators, connections, covariant differentiation, tangent vectors, geodesics, and the Riemann curvature tensor are derived as relations between quantum operators. The quantum formulation retains the symmetry between coordinate and momentum representations required by the principle of complementarity.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1984•1 citation

Introduction to Representations of the Canonical Commutation and Anticommutation Relations

Jan Dereziński

Since the early days of quantum mechanics it has been noted that the position operator x and the momentum operator D := −i∇ satisfy the following commutation relation:

•Jan 1, 2005•39 citations
A general proof of several formulas used in three-dimensional quantum problems is presented. By considering the two vector operators A and B having Cartesian components that satisfy the canonical commutation relations—as the position and momentum operators do—we obtain commutation rules and relations for the projection onto each another. All of these rules and relations have symmetry under A↔B exchange. This symmetry suggests, in the particular case of position and momentum operators, a new operator, the projection of r onto p, which seems to be useful in dissipative quantum problems.
The claim that unitary transformations in quantum mechanics correspond to the canonical transformations of classical mechanics is not correct. The spectra of operators produced by unitary transformation of Cartesian coordinate and momentum operators (q, k) are necessarily continuous over the entire real domain of their eigenvalues. Operators with spectra which are not everywhere continuous are generated from (q, k) by one-sided unitary transformations U for which U†U = 1 but for which UU† commutes with either q or k (but not both). If UU† commutes with k, the new coordinates and momenta (r, s) satisfy commutation relations [sm, rn] = 2πi1δm,n, [sm, sn] = 0, but [rm, rn] ≠ 0; (r, s) are canonical only for one-dimensional systems. The properties of one-sided unitary transformations are described; they are characterized by φ(K), the eigenvalue of UU†. The one-dimensional case for which the one-sided unitary transformation is canonical is discussed in detail. A prescription is given for obtaining the operator canonically conjugate to any one-dimensional observable. Generalization to higher dimensions is also discussed.
Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value ihihih where hhh is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.
Abstract The purpose of this article is to construct an explicit relation between the field operators in Quantum Field Theory and the relevant operators in Quantum Mechanics for a system of N identical particles, which are the symmetrised functions of the canonical operators of position and momentum, thus providing a clear relation between Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics. This is achieved in the context of the non-interacting Klein–Gordon field. Though this procedure may not be extendible to interacting field theories, since it relies crucially on particle number conservation, we find it nevertheless important that such an explicit relation can be found at least for free fields. It also comes out that whatever statistics the field operators obey (either commuting or anticommuting), the position and momentum operators obey commutation relations. The construction of position operators raises the issue of localizability of particles in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, as the position operator for a single particle turns out to be the Newton–Wigner position operator. We make some clarifications on the interpretation of Newton–Wigner localized states and we consider the transformation properties of position operators under Lorentz transformations, showing that they do not transform as tensors, rather in a manner that preserves the canonical commutation relations. From a complex Klein–Gordon field, position and momentum operators can be constructed for both particles and antiparticles.
Geometrical properties of space are described by relations between quantum observables, functions of generalized coordinate and momentum operators of a physical system. Space comprises the set of eigenvalues of the coordinate observables, which may be a discrete set of points instead of the continuum of classical geometry. Differentiation on coordinates and momenta is defined by commutation operations. Well-known formulas from classical geometry for gradient and divergence operators, connections, covariant differentiation, tangent vectors, geodesics, and the Riemann curvature tensor are derived as relations between quantum operators. The quantum formulation retains the symmetry between coordinate and momentum representations required by the principle of complementarity.