Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Response to Penn’s ‘‘Comment on Pictet’s experiment’’

James Evans

Published Feb 1, 1986• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.14864

Related papers

Comment on Pictet’s experiment

S. Penn

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1986•12 citations

Response to the Comments of A. Shimony

Laszlo Tisza

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1976•0 citations

Response to ‘‘Comment on ‘A critical re-examination of the Aharonov–Bohm effect’ ’’

Dipankar Home

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1985•1 citation

A new perspective on CP and T violation

Abhay Ashtekar

It is shown that the results of CP and T violation experiments can be interpreted using a very general framework that does not require a Hilbert space of states or linear operators to represent the symmetries or dynamics. Analysis within this general framework brings out the aspects of quantum mechanics that are essential for this interpretation. More importantly, should quantum mechanics be eventually replaced by a new paradigm, this framework could \emph{still} be used to establish violation of CP and T invariance from the already known experimental results. This work arose as a `formal response' to a talk "Three Merry Roads to T-Violation" by Dr. Bryan Roberts [1]. Both talks were given at a "Workshop on Cosmology and Time" held at Penn State in April 2013, which brought together physicists and philosophers of science.

arXiv:1307.1331•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A•Jul 4, 2013•1 citation

Critique and extension of the Maier-Leibnitz experiment

Roger Fleming, G S Higginson

•Jul 1, 1963•0 citations

Maxwell's Demon Now A Reality? Physicists Implement A Version Of Famous Physics Thought Experiment

Alexander Bolano

In a new study published September 5th, physicists at Penn State report that they have successfully implemented an experimental version of Maxwell's demon, a physics thought experiment meant to challenge the second law of thermodynamics. By using complicated procedures involving lasers and magnetic fields, the team created a method for sorting a supercooled cloud of cesium

Science Trends•Sep 6, 2018•0 citations
It is shown that the results of CP and T violation experiments can be interpreted using a very general framework that does not require a Hilbert space of states or linear operators to represent the symmetries or dynamics. Analysis within this general framework brings out the aspects of quantum mechanics that are essential for this interpretation. More importantly, should quantum mechanics be eventually replaced by a new paradigm, this framework could \emph{still} be used to establish violation of CP and T invariance from the already known experimental results. This work arose as a `formal response' to a talk "Three Merry Roads to T-Violation" by Dr. Bryan Roberts [1]. Both talks were given at a "Workshop on Cosmology and Time" held at Penn State in April 2013, which brought together physicists and philosophers of science.