Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Finite optical Hamiltonian systems

Kurt Bernardo Wolf, Natig M. Atakishiyev, Luis Edgar Vincent, Guillermo Krötzsch, Juvenal Rueda-Paz

Published Aug 10, 2011• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

In this essay we finitely quantize the Hamiltonian system of geometric optics to a finite system that is also Hamiltonian, but where signals are described by complex N-vectors, which are subject to unitary transformations that form the group U(N). This group can be decomposed into U(2)-paraxial and aberration transformations. Proper irreducible representation bases are thus provided by quantum angular momentum theory. For one-dimensional systems we have waveguide models. For two-dimensional systems we can have Cartesian or polar sensor arrays, where digital images are subject to unitary rotation, gyration or asymmetric Fourier transformations, as well as a unitary map between the two arrays.

DOI
10.1117/12.902162

Related papers

Finite Hamiltonian systems: Linear transformations and aberrations

Kurt Bernardo Wolf

Finite Hamiltonian systems contain operators of position, momentum, and energy, having a finite number N of equally-spaced eigenvalues. Such systems are under the æis of the algebra su(2), and their phase space is a sphere. Rigid motions of this phase space form the group SU(2); overall phases complete this to U(2). But since N-point states can be subject to U(N) ⊃U(2) transformations, the rest of the generators will provide all N 2 unitary transformations of the states, which appear as nonlinear transformations—aberrations—of the system phase space. They are built through the “finite quantization” of a classical optical system.

Physics of Atomic Nuclei•Mar 1, 2010•0 citations

Finite Hamiltonian Systems: Linear Transformations and Aberrations

Kurt Bernardo Wolf, Piotr Kielanowski, Anatol Odzijewicz +2 more

In finite Hamiltonian systems, the operators of position, momentum, and energy have a finite number N of eigenvalues. These operators can be naturally realized as generators of the Lie algebra su(2), in a representation of spin j, of dimension N = 2j+1. Time evolution is rotation of a phase space sphere, whose projections perform the harmonic motion of an oscillator. The (centrally extended) group of rigid—linear—motions of this phase space is then U(2). On the other hand, N‐point wavefunctions—signals—can be subject to a U(N) group of unitary matrices, containing the linear U(2); aberrations are transformations outside that subgroup. As in geometric optics, we classify the aberration multiplets by order and weight. Their action on phase space is displayed by means of a Wigner function on the sphere, to be compared with the corresponding geometric canonical transformations.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Linear transformations and aberrations in continuous and finite systems

Kurt Bernardo Wolf

In geometric optics there is a natural distinction between the paraxial and aberration regimes, which contain respectively the linear and nonlinear canonical transformations of position and momentum in the phase space. In the Lie-theoretical presentation, linear inhomogeneous transformations are generated by linear and quadratic functions of the phase space, while aberrations of increasing order are generated by homogeneous functions with higher powers of these coordinates. In a way parallel but distinct from the Schrödinger quantization of continuous classical systems, we quantize the geometric optical model into discrete, finite-dimensional systems based on the Lie algebra , whose wavefunctions are N -point signals, phase space is a sphere and transformations are represented by the N × N unitary matrices that form the group . We factor this group into -linear and nonlinear unitary transformations of phase space and classify all its N 2 − 4 aberrations. This offers a new parametrization of based on a chosen subgroup.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 15, 2008•10 citations

Geometry and dynamics of squeezing in finite systems

Kurt Bernardo Wolf, Guillermo Krötzsch

Squeezing and its inverse magnification form a one-parameter group of linear canonical transformations of continuous signals in paraxial optics. We search for corresponding unitary matrices to apply on signal vectors in N-point finite Hamiltonian systems. The analysis is extended to the phase space representation by means of Wigner quasi-probability distribution functions on the discrete torus and on the sphere. Together with two previous studies of the fractional Fourier and Fresnel transforms, we complete the finite counterparts of the group of linear canonical transformations.

Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Jan 1, 2007•7 citations

An angular momentum approach to quadratic Fourier transform, Hadamard matrices, Gauss sums, mutually unbiased bases, the unitary group and the Pauli group

M. Kibler

The construction of unitary operator bases in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space is reviewed through a nonstandard approach combining angular momentum theory and representation theory of SU (2). A single formula for the bases is obtained from a polar decomposition of SU (2) and is analyzed in terms of cyclic groups, quadratic Fourier transforms, Hadamard matrices and generalized Gauss sums. Weyl pairs, generalized Pauli operators and their application to the unitary group and the Pauli group naturally arise in this approach.

arXiv:0907.2838•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 12, 2009•58 citations

Fractional Fourier–Kravchuk transform

Natig M. Atakishiyev, Kurt Bernardo Wolf

We introduce a model of multimodal waveguides with a finite number of sensor points. This is a finite oscillator whose eigenstates are Kravchuk functions, which are orthonormal on a finite set of points and satisfy a physically important difference equation. The fractional finite Fourier–Kravchuk transform is defined to self-reproduce these functions. The analysis of finite signal processing uses the representations of the ordinary rotation group SO(3). This leads naturally to a phase space for finite optics such that the continuum limit (N→∞) reproduces Fourier paraxial optics.

Journal of the Optical Society of America A•Jul 1, 1997•138 citations
In this essay we finitely quantize the Hamiltonian system of geometric optics to a finite system that is also Hamiltonian, but where signals are described by complex N-vectors, which are subject to unitary transformations that form the group U(N). This group can be decomposed into U(2)-paraxial and aberration transformations. Proper irreducible representation bases are thus provided by quantum angular momentum theory. For one-dimensional systems we have waveguide models. For two-dimensional systems we can have Cartesian or polar sensor arrays, where digital images are subject to unitary rotation, gyration or asymmetric Fourier transformations, as well as a unitary map between the two arrays.
Finite Hamiltonian systems contain operators of position, momentum, and energy, having a finite number N of equally-spaced eigenvalues. Such systems are under the æis of the algebra su(2), and their phase space is a sphere. Rigid motions of this phase space form the group SU(2); overall phases complete this to U(2). But since N-point states can be subject to U(N) ⊃U(2) transformations, the rest of the generators will provide all N 2 unitary transformations of the states, which appear as nonlinear transformations—aberrations—of the system phase space. They are built through the “finite quantization” of a classical optical system.
In finite Hamiltonian systems, the operators of position, momentum, and energy have a finite number N of eigenvalues. These operators can be naturally realized as generators of the Lie algebra su(2), in a representation of spin j, of dimension N = 2j+1. Time evolution is rotation of a phase space sphere, whose projections perform the harmonic motion of an oscillator. The (centrally extended) group of rigid—linear—motions of this phase space is then U(2). On the other hand, N‐point wavefunctions—signals—can be subject to a U(N) group of unitary matrices, containing the linear U(2); aberrations are transformations outside that subgroup. As in geometric optics, we classify the aberration multiplets by order and weight. Their action on phase space is displayed by means of a Wigner function on the sphere, to be compared with the corresponding geometric canonical transformations.
In geometric optics there is a natural distinction between the paraxial and aberration regimes, which contain respectively the linear and nonlinear canonical transformations of position and momentum in the phase space. In the Lie-theoretical presentation, linear inhomogeneous transformations are generated by linear and quadratic functions of the phase space, while aberrations of increasing order are generated by homogeneous functions with higher powers of these coordinates. In a way parallel but distinct from the Schrödinger quantization of continuous classical systems, we quantize the geometric optical model into discrete, finite-dimensional systems based on the Lie algebra , whose wavefunctions are N -point signals, phase space is a sphere and transformations are represented by the N × N unitary matrices that form the group . We factor this group into -linear and nonlinear unitary transformations of phase space and classify all its N 2 − 4 aberrations. This offers a new parametrization of based on a chosen subgroup.
Squeezing and its inverse magnification form a one-parameter group of linear canonical transformations of continuous signals in paraxial optics. We search for corresponding unitary matrices to apply on signal vectors in N-point finite Hamiltonian systems. The analysis is extended to the phase space representation by means of Wigner quasi-probability distribution functions on the discrete torus and on the sphere. Together with two previous studies of the fractional Fourier and Fresnel transforms, we complete the finite counterparts of the group of linear canonical transformations.
The construction of unitary operator bases in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space is reviewed through a nonstandard approach combining angular momentum theory and representation theory of SU (2). A single formula for the bases is obtained from a polar decomposition of SU (2) and is analyzed in terms of cyclic groups, quadratic Fourier transforms, Hadamard matrices and generalized Gauss sums. Weyl pairs, generalized Pauli operators and their application to the unitary group and the Pauli group naturally arise in this approach.
We introduce a model of multimodal waveguides with a finite number of sensor points. This is a finite oscillator whose eigenstates are Kravchuk functions, which are orthonormal on a finite set of points and satisfy a physically important difference equation. The fractional finite Fourier–Kravchuk transform is defined to self-reproduce these functions. The analysis of finite signal processing uses the representations of the ordinary rotation group SO(3). This leads naturally to a phase space for finite optics such that the continuum limit (N→∞) reproduces Fourier paraxial optics.