Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

The 9th Biennial Meeting of the International Quantum Structures Association

Bart D’Hooghe, Jarosław Pykacz

Published Oct 4, 2010• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-010-0513-0

Related papers

Introduction to the 2004 Meeting of the International Quantum Structures Association

Franklin E. Schroeck

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 2005•0 citations

9th International Conference On Quantum Optics 2002

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum Interaction 2015: 9th International Conference, QI 2015,

Harald Atmanspacher A, Thomas Filk A, Emmanuel M. Pothos

•Jan 1, 2016•1 citation

9th Central European Workshop on Quantum Optics

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

9th International Conference on Recent Progress in Many Body Theories

R. F. Bishop, D Neilson

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, measurements, and macroscopic behavior

Dennis Dieks

The modal interpretation explained here construes the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics in terms of physical properties (``be-ables,'' ``existents'') in such a way that the property attribution reflects the mathematical structure as much as possible---no additional structure is superimposed on the formalism. We generalize the interpretation by specifying a dynamics of physical properties, and also extend it while replying to recent objections by Albert and Loewer 2 [Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, 1990), Vol. 1, p. 277], and by Elby [Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 5 (1993)]. I also discuss questions relating to relativistic aspects and casuality.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1994•73 citations
The modal interpretation explained here construes the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics in terms of physical properties (``be-ables,'' ``existents'') in such a way that the property attribution reflects the mathematical structure as much as possible---no additional structure is superimposed on the formalism. We generalize the interpretation by specifying a dynamics of physical properties, and also extend it while replying to recent objections by Albert and Loewer 2 [Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, 1990), Vol. 1, p. 277], and by Elby [Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 5 (1993)]. I also discuss questions relating to relativistic aspects and casuality.