Interpreting a macrorealistic quantum theory

Bunge, Mario

Swati Kumari, A. K. Pan

In two-party, two-input and two-output measurement scenario only relevant Bell's inequality is the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) form. They also provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for local realism. Any other form, such as, Clauser-Horne and Wigner forms reduce to the CHSH one. Standard Leggett-Garg inequalities are often considered to be the temporal analog of CHSH inequalities. But, they do not provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for macrorealism. There is thus scope of formulating new macrorealist inequalities different and stronger than the standard Leggett-Garg inequalities for testing compatibility between the macrorealism and quantum theory. In this paper, we propose three different classes of macrorealistic inequalities in three-time scenario; (i) The ones equivalent to standard Leggett-Garg inequalities in both macrorealist model and in quantum theory. (ii) A class of inequalities which are equivalent to the standard ones in macrorealist model but inequivalent and stronger in quantum theory (iii) Another class of inequalities which are inquivalent to the all formulations of Leggett-Garg inequalities both in macrorealist model and in quantum theory. This class of macrorealist inequalities reveals the incompatibility between macrorealism and quantum theory for specific cases even when any other formulation of Leggett-Garg inequalities fail to do so. We extend the formulations of the class (ii) inequalities to the four-time and two-time measurement scenario. Further, we provide a brief discussion about the alternate formulation of macrorealism which was derived based on the no-signaling in time conditions.

Swati Kumari, A. K. Pan

Abstract In two-party, two-input and two-output measurement scenario only relevant Bell’s inequality is the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) form. They also provide the necessary and sufficient conditions (NSCs) for local realism. Any other form, such as, Clauser–Horne and Wigner forms reduce to the CHSH one. The standard Leggett–Garg inequalities, proposed for testing incompatibility between macrorealism and quantum theory, are often considered to be the temporal analog of CHSH inequalities. However, they do not provide the NSCs for macrorealism. There is thus scope of formulating new macrorealist inequalities inequivalent and stronger than the standard Leggett–Garg inequalities. In this paper, we propose two different classes of macrorealistic inequalities. A class of inequalities which are equivalent to the standard ones in macrorealist model but inequivalent and stronger in quantum theory, and the other class of inequalities are inequivalent to the all the other formulations of Leggett–Garg inequalities both in macrorealist model and in quantum theory. The latter class of macrorealist inequalities reveals the incompatibility between macrorealism and quantum theory for specific cases even when any other formulation of Leggett–Garg inequalities fails to do so. We extend the formulations of inequivalent Leggett–Garg inequalities to the four-time and two-time measurement scenarios. Further, we provide a brief discussion about the alternative formulation of macrorealism known as the no-signaling in time (NSIT) conditions.

Robert B. Griffiths

David Hodgson

Mark M. Wilde, Ari Mizel

The rise of quantum information theory has lent new relevance to experimental tests for non-classicality, particularly in controversial cases such as adiabatic quantum computing superconducting circuits. The Leggett-Garg inequality is a "Bell inequality in time" designed to indicate whether a single quantum system behaves in a macrorealistic fashion. Unfortunately, a violation of the inequality can only show that the system is either (i) non-macrorealistic or (ii) macrorealistic but subjected to a measurement technique that happens to disturb the system. The "clumsiness" loophole (ii) provides reliable refuge for the stubborn macrorealist, who can invoke it to brand recent experimental and theoretical work on the Leggett-Garg test inconclusive. Here, we present a revised Leggett-Garg protocol that permits one to conclude that a system is either (i) non-macrorealistic or (ii) macrorealistic but with the property that two seemingly non-invasive measurements can somehow collude and strongly disturb the system. By providing an explicit check of the invasiveness of the measurements, the protocol replaces the clumsiness loophole with a significantly smaller "collusion" loophole. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.