Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Measurement of time by quantum clocks

Asher Peres

Published Jul 1, 1980• 240 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A clock is a dynamical system which passes through a succession of states at constant time intervals. If coupled to another system, it can measure the duration of a physical process and even keep a permanent record of it, such as in a time-of-flight experiment or in observing the lifetime of an unstable atom. A clock can also be used to control the duration of a process, e.g., the precession of a spin in a magnetic field which is turned on and off at prescribed times. This article shows how to construct time-independent Hamiltonians describing these possible uses of a quantum clock. As expected, a good time resolution entails a large energy exchange between the clock and the other system, thereby modifying the evolution of the latter. This evolution may even be halted by using a clock which is too precise (this is the quantum analog of Zeno’s paradox).

DOI
10.1119/1.12061

Related papers

Based on Quantum Sensors: High-Precision Time Measurement

Jincheng Zhang

This paper explores the potential of quantum sensors for achieving unprecedented levels of precision in time measurement. The core concept leverages the inherent sensitivity of quantum systems to external perturbations, particularly quantum entanglement and coherence, to directly measure the passage of time. Traditional timekeeping methods rely on periodic phenomena like atomic oscillations, which introduce systematic errors and limitations. Quantum sensors, however, offer a fundamentally different approach, promising a shift towards a measurement paradigm where time itself is directly sensed. This work details a theoretical framework for such a system, outlining key components, potential challenges, and the anticipated improvements in accuracy compared to existing technologies. We propose a system utilizing a macroscopic quantum clock, exploiting the precisely controlled evolution of quantum superposition states to determine time intervals with potentially sub-picosecond resolution. The design emphasizes the minimization of decoherence effects—a critical factor in realizing the full potential of quantum time measurement—and introduces novel strategies for signal processing and calibration. This research contributes to the emerging field of quantum metrology and lays the groundwork for future advancements in high-precision timekeeping and fundamental physics research. ---

•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations

The time qubit

Yakov Bloch

A spin precessing in a magnetic field is often used as a quantum clock, for example in tunneling-time measurements. We show that such a clock can exist in a coherent superposition of opposite temporal orientations, treating the arrow of time as a quantum two-level system. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer with equal and opposite magnetic fields provides a simple implementation, enabling interference between forward and backward evolution and Bell-type tests of temporal coherence. Extending the framework to relativistic dynamics reveals that the Dirac Hamiltonian describes an intrinsic coupling between a spin qubit and a time qubit, with matter and antimatter corresponding to opposite poles on the temporal Bloch sphere.

quant-pharXiv:2511.07220•Nov 11, 2025•0 citations

Time as the result of the observer’s measurement

Amrit Šorli, Štefan Čelan

Since the beginning of physics, time is the duration of material changes. We measure time with clocks. The notion of time in Newton physics, Einstein’s relativity, and quantum physics are different despite we always measure the same time with the same apparatuses that are clocks. We showed in this article that the act of the measurement done by the observer is generating duration. Time as duration is the result of the interaction between the observer and physical reality via clocks. In the universe, only changes exist. Changes have no duration on their own. Time as duration is born with the measurement done by the observer. Duration is relative and depends on the variable energy density of time-invariant superfluid quantum space that is the carrier of EPR-type entanglement.

Physics Essays•Dec 30, 2021•16 citations

The thermodynamics of time

Dries Sels, Michiel Wouters

The problem of time is a deep paradox in our physical description of the world. According to Aristotle's relational theory, time is a measure of change and does not exist on its own. In contrast, quantum mechanics, just like Newtonian mechanics, is equipped with a master clock that dictates the evolution of a system. This clock is infinitely precise and tacitly supplied free of charge from outside physics. Not only does this absolute time make it notoriously difficult to make a consistent theory of quantum gravity, it is also the underlying problem in establishing the second law. Indeed, contrary to our experience, the Wheeler-deWitt equation --a canonical quantization of general relativity-- predicts a static universe. Similarly, when simply concerned with the dynamics of a closed quantum system, there is no second law because the Von Neumann entropy is invariant under unitary transformations. Here we are mainly concerned with the latter problem and we show that it can be resolved by attributing a minimal amount of resources to the measurement of time. Although there is an absolute time in quantum mechanics, an observer can only establish a time by measuring a clock. For a local measurement, the minimal entropy production is equal to the number of ticks. This lower bound is attained by a black hole.

arXiv:1501.05567•Jan 22, 2015•5 citations

Quantum time-of-flight measurements: Kicked clock versus continuous clock

Daniel Alonso, R. Sala Mayato, Juan Gonzalo Muga

The measurement of time durations or instants of occurrence of events has been frequently modeled ``operationally'' by coupling the system of interest to a ``clock.'' According to several of these models, the operational approach is limited at low energies because the perturbation of the clock does not allow to reproduce accurately the corresponding ideal time quantity, defined for the system in isolation. We show that, for a time-of-flight measurement model that can be set to measure dwell or arrival times, these limitations may be overcome by extending the range of energies where the clock works properly using pulsed couplings rather than continuous ones.

arXiv:quant-ph/0205136•Physical Review A•Mar 17, 2003•19 citations

Spacetime-covariant approach to inertial and accelerated quantum clocks in first quantization

E. A. Oliveira, André G. S. Landulfo

It is expected that a quantum theory of gravity will radically alter our current notion of spacetime geometry. However, contrary to what was commonly assumed for many decades, quantum gravity effects could manifest in scales much larger than the Planck scale, provided that there is enough coherence in the superposition of geometries. Quantum clocks, i.e. quantum mechanical systems whose internal dynamics can keep track of proper time lapses, are a very promising tool for probing such low-energy quantum gravity effects. In this work, we contribute to this subject by proposing a spacetime-covariant formalism to describe clocks in first quantization. In particular, we account for the possibility of dynamically accelerated clocks via suitable couplings with external fields. We find that a particular decomposition of the (quadratic) clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors, when attainable, enables one to compute the evolution of the system directly in terms of the clock's proper time while maintaining explicit covariance. When this decomposition is possible, the evolution obtained is always unitary, even with couplings with external fields used to, e.g., accelerate the clocks. We then apply this formulation to compute the joint time evolution of a pair of quantum clocks in two cases: (i) inertial clocks with relative motion and (ii) charged clocks accelerated by a uniform magnetic field. In both cases, when our clocks are prepared in coherent states, we find that the density matrix $ρ_{τ_2|τ_1}$ describing time-measurements of the two clocks yields not only conditional probabilities whose peaks match exactly the classical expected values for time dilation, but also yields coherent quantum fluctuations around that peak, with a profile which is either (i) a pure Gaussian or (ii) a Gaussian combined with a periodic modulation.

arXiv:2508.05897•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Jan 21, 2026•1 citation
A clock is a dynamical system which passes through a succession of states at constant time intervals. If coupled to another system, it can measure the duration of a physical process and even keep a permanent record of it, such as in a time-of-flight experiment or in observing the lifetime of an unstable atom. A clock can also be used to control the duration of a process, e.g., the precession of a spin in a magnetic field which is turned on and off at prescribed times. This article shows how to construct time-independent Hamiltonians describing these possible uses of a quantum clock. As expected, a good time resolution entails a large energy exchange between the clock and the other system, thereby modifying the evolution of the latter. This evolution may even be halted by using a clock which is too precise (this is the quantum analog of Zeno’s paradox).
This paper explores the potential of quantum sensors for achieving unprecedented levels of precision in time measurement. The core concept leverages the inherent sensitivity of quantum systems to external perturbations, particularly quantum entanglement and coherence, to directly measure the passage of time. Traditional timekeeping methods rely on periodic phenomena like atomic oscillations, which introduce systematic errors and limitations. Quantum sensors, however, offer a fundamentally different approach, promising a shift towards a measurement paradigm where time itself is directly sensed. This work details a theoretical framework for such a system, outlining key components, potential challenges, and the anticipated improvements in accuracy compared to existing technologies. We propose a system utilizing a macroscopic quantum clock, exploiting the precisely controlled evolution of quantum superposition states to determine time intervals with potentially sub-picosecond resolution. The design emphasizes the minimization of decoherence effects—a critical factor in realizing the full potential of quantum time measurement—and introduces novel strategies for signal processing and calibration. This research contributes to the emerging field of quantum metrology and lays the groundwork for future advancements in high-precision timekeeping and fundamental physics research. ---
A spin precessing in a magnetic field is often used as a quantum clock, for example in tunneling-time measurements. We show that such a clock can exist in a coherent superposition of opposite temporal orientations, treating the arrow of time as a quantum two-level system. A Mach-Zehnder interferometer with equal and opposite magnetic fields provides a simple implementation, enabling interference between forward and backward evolution and Bell-type tests of temporal coherence. Extending the framework to relativistic dynamics reveals that the Dirac Hamiltonian describes an intrinsic coupling between a spin qubit and a time qubit, with matter and antimatter corresponding to opposite poles on the temporal Bloch sphere.
Since the beginning of physics, time is the duration of material changes. We measure time with clocks. The notion of time in Newton physics, Einstein’s relativity, and quantum physics are different despite we always measure the same time with the same apparatuses that are clocks. We showed in this article that the act of the measurement done by the observer is generating duration. Time as duration is the result of the interaction between the observer and physical reality via clocks. In the universe, only changes exist. Changes have no duration on their own. Time as duration is born with the measurement done by the observer. Duration is relative and depends on the variable energy density of time-invariant superfluid quantum space that is the carrier of EPR-type entanglement.
The problem of time is a deep paradox in our physical description of the world. According to Aristotle's relational theory, time is a measure of change and does not exist on its own. In contrast, quantum mechanics, just like Newtonian mechanics, is equipped with a master clock that dictates the evolution of a system. This clock is infinitely precise and tacitly supplied free of charge from outside physics. Not only does this absolute time make it notoriously difficult to make a consistent theory of quantum gravity, it is also the underlying problem in establishing the second law. Indeed, contrary to our experience, the Wheeler-deWitt equation --a canonical quantization of general relativity-- predicts a static universe. Similarly, when simply concerned with the dynamics of a closed quantum system, there is no second law because the Von Neumann entropy is invariant under unitary transformations. Here we are mainly concerned with the latter problem and we show that it can be resolved by attributing a minimal amount of resources to the measurement of time. Although there is an absolute time in quantum mechanics, an observer can only establish a time by measuring a clock. For a local measurement, the minimal entropy production is equal to the number of ticks. This lower bound is attained by a black hole.
The measurement of time durations or instants of occurrence of events has been frequently modeled ``operationally'' by coupling the system of interest to a ``clock.'' According to several of these models, the operational approach is limited at low energies because the perturbation of the clock does not allow to reproduce accurately the corresponding ideal time quantity, defined for the system in isolation. We show that, for a time-of-flight measurement model that can be set to measure dwell or arrival times, these limitations may be overcome by extending the range of energies where the clock works properly using pulsed couplings rather than continuous ones.
It is expected that a quantum theory of gravity will radically alter our current notion of spacetime geometry. However, contrary to what was commonly assumed for many decades, quantum gravity effects could manifest in scales much larger than the Planck scale, provided that there is enough coherence in the superposition of geometries. Quantum clocks, i.e. quantum mechanical systems whose internal dynamics can keep track of proper time lapses, are a very promising tool for probing such low-energy quantum gravity effects. In this work, we contribute to this subject by proposing a spacetime-covariant formalism to describe clocks in first quantization. In particular, we account for the possibility of dynamically accelerated clocks via suitable couplings with external fields. We find that a particular decomposition of the (quadratic) clock Hamiltonian into positive- and negative-mass sectors, when attainable, enables one to compute the evolution of the system directly in terms of the clock's proper time while maintaining explicit covariance. When this decomposition is possible, the evolution obtained is always unitary, even with couplings with external fields used to, e.g., accelerate the clocks. We then apply this formulation to compute the joint time evolution of a pair of quantum clocks in two cases: (i) inertial clocks with relative motion and (ii) charged clocks accelerated by a uniform magnetic field. In both cases, when our clocks are prepared in coherent states, we find that the density matrix ρτ2∣τ1ρ_{τ_2|τ_1}ρτ2​∣τ1​​ describing time-measurements of the two clocks yields not only conditional probabilities whose peaks match exactly the classical expected values for time dilation, but also yields coherent quantum fluctuations around that peak, with a profile which is either (i) a pure Gaussian or (ii) a Gaussian combined with a periodic modulation.