Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters B

Adiabatic theorem and anomalous commutators

Shinji Iida, Hiroshi Kuratsuji

Published Jan 1, 1987• 18 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0370-2693(87)90575-2

Related papers

Adiabatic Theorem and Anomalous Commutators

Shinji Iida, Hiroshi Kuratsuji

Abstract We show that the geometrical phase factor recently found in the quantum adiabatic theorem modifies the canonical structure of the phase space. This gives rise to the anomalous terms in the quantum mechanical commutation relations.

•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

Remarks on the quantum adiabatic theorem

V. S. Buslaev, E. A. Grinina

St Petersburg Mathematical Journal•Jun 21, 2005•5 citations

Comments on the adiabatic theorem

Dmitrii A. Trunin

We consider the simplest example of a nonstationary quantum system which is quantum mechanical oscillator with varying frequency and [Formula: see text] self-interaction. We calculate loop corrections to the Keldysh, retarded/advanced propagators and vertices using Schwinger–Keldysh diagrammatic technique and show that there is no physical secular growth of the loop corrections in the cases of constant and adiabatically varying frequency. This fact corresponds to the well-known adiabatic theorem in quantum mechanics. However, in the case of nonadiabatically varying frequency we obtain strong IR corrections to the Keldysh propagator which come from the “sunset” diagrams, grow with time indefinitely and indicate energy pumping into the system. It reveals itself via the change in time of the level population and of the anomalous quantum average.

arXiv:1805.04856•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Aug 28, 2018•12 citations

The Quantum Adiabatic Theorem

Pierre Lochak, Claude Meunier

Applied mathematical sciences•Jan 1, 1988•6 citations

On the adiabatic theorem in quantum theory

Kurt O. Friedrichs

•Jan 1, 1956•8 citations

Resolution of monopole singularity in Berry's phase

Shinichi Deguchi, Kazuo Fujikawa

A monopole-like singularity generated by Berry's phase in momentum space and associated anomalous Poisson brackets have been discussed in various fields. In the applications, it is crucially important to understand precisely what is the monopole in momentum space implied by Berry's phase. Berry's phase is sensitive to how it is measured and thus very different from the genuine Dirac monopole; the monopole-like singularity in Berry's phase is a result of adiabatic approximation while the singularity disappears in non-adiabatic approximation. The resolution of monopole-like singularity in the non-adiabatic domain implies that no Dirac string appears close to the monopole position and the anomalous terms containing the monopole flux in quantum mechanical commutation relations are absent. The absence of modified commutators is also concluded if one understands Berry's phase in momentum space as an $O(\hbar)$ quantum mechanical effect with a quantized magnetic charge $e_{M}=2\pi\hbar$.

•Feb 27, 2019•1 citation
We consider the simplest example of a nonstationary quantum system which is quantum mechanical oscillator with varying frequency and [Formula: see text] self-interaction. We calculate loop corrections to the Keldysh, retarded/advanced propagators and vertices using Schwinger–Keldysh diagrammatic technique and show that there is no physical secular growth of the loop corrections in the cases of constant and adiabatically varying frequency. This fact corresponds to the well-known adiabatic theorem in quantum mechanics. However, in the case of nonadiabatically varying frequency we obtain strong IR corrections to the Keldysh propagator which come from the “sunset” diagrams, grow with time indefinitely and indicate energy pumping into the system. It reveals itself via the change in time of the level population and of the anomalous quantum average.
A monopole-like singularity generated by Berry's phase in momentum space and associated anomalous Poisson brackets have been discussed in various fields. In the applications, it is crucially important to understand precisely what is the monopole in momentum space implied by Berry's phase. Berry's phase is sensitive to how it is measured and thus very different from the genuine Dirac monopole; the monopole-like singularity in Berry's phase is a result of adiabatic approximation while the singularity disappears in non-adiabatic approximation. The resolution of monopole-like singularity in the non-adiabatic domain implies that no Dirac string appears close to the monopole position and the anomalous terms containing the monopole flux in quantum mechanical commutation relations are absent. The absence of modified commutators is also concluded if one understands Berry's phase in momentum space as an O(ℏ)O(\hbar)O(ℏ) quantum mechanical effect with a quantized magnetic charge eM=2πℏe_{M}=2\pi\hbareM​=2πℏ.