Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress of Theoretical Physics

Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theories in the Quantized Space. II: -- Quantum Mechanics --

Y. Yamaguchi

Published Apr 1, 2005• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Some examples in new quantum mechanics with the Riemannian energy-momentum space are described.
DOI
10.1143/ptp.113.883

Related papers

Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theories in the Quantized Space. II

Yoshio YAMAGUCHI

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Quantum mechanics on Riemannian manifold in Schwinger's quantization approach II

N.M. Chepilko, A.V. Romanenko

arXiv:hep-th/0102115•The European Physical Journal C•Jul 1, 2001•3 citations

Quantum Mechanics in Riemannian Space: Different Approaches to Quantization of the Geodesic Motion Compared

Эрнест Ахмеджанович Тагиров

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2003•1 citation

Unfinished history and paradoxes of quantum potential. II. Relativistic point of view

Эрнест Ахмеджанович Тагиров

This is the second of the two related papers analyzing the origins and possible explanations of a paradoxical phenomenon of the quantum potential (QP). It arises in quantum mechanics (QM) of a particle in a Riemannian n-dimensional configurational space obtained by various procedures of quantization of non-relativistic natural Hamilton systems. Now, two questions are investigated: 1) Does a QP appear in non-relativistic QM generated by the quantum theory of a scalar field (QFT) non-minimally coupled to the space-time metric? 2) To which extent is it in accord with quantization of natural systems? To this end, the asymptotic non-relativistic equation for particle-interpretable wave functions and operators of canonical observables are obtained from the primary QFT objects. It is shown that, in globally static space-time, the Hamilton operators coincide at the origin of the quasi-Euclidean space coordinates in both alternative approaches for any non-minimality constant $$\tilde \xi$$ , but a certain requirement of the Equivalence Principle to the quantum field propagator distinguishes the unique value $$\tilde \xi = 1/6$$ = 1/6. Just the same value had the constant ζ in the quantum Hamiltonians arising from the traditional quantizations of natural systems: the DeWitt canonical, Pauli-DeWitt quasiclassical, geometric and Feynman ones, as well as in the revised Schrödinger variational quantization. Thus, the QP generated by mechanics is tightly related to non-minimality of the quantum scalar field. Meanwhile, an essential discrepancy exists between the non-relativistic QMs derived from the two alternative approaches: QFT generates a scalar QP, whereas various quantizations of natural mechanics lead to QPs depending on the choice of space coordinates as physical observables and nonvanishing even in flat space if the coordinates are curvilinear.

arXiv:1201.5806•Gravitation and Cosmology•Jan 1, 2013•2 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theories in the Quantized Space. I

Yoshio YAMAGUCHI

•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics in Riemannian Space-Times. I. The Canonical Approach

Эрнест Ахмеджанович Тагиров

This paper is the first of two papers devoted to formulation of quantum mechanics of a particle in a normal geodesic frame of reference in the general Riemannian space-time. Here canonical quantization of geodesic motion in the 1+3-formalism is considered, the result of which will be compared in the subsequent paper II with that of the field-theoretical approach, see also gr-qc/9807030. The Schrödinger representation of quantum-mechanical kinematics and dynamics is presented in the general-covariant form and a physical interpretation of the state vectors and the position operators is discussed.

arXiv:gr-qc/9812084•Dec 24, 1998•2 citations
This is the second of the two related papers analyzing the origins and possible explanations of a paradoxical phenomenon of the quantum potential (QP). It arises in quantum mechanics (QM) of a particle in a Riemannian n-dimensional configurational space obtained by various procedures of quantization of non-relativistic natural Hamilton systems. Now, two questions are investigated: 1) Does a QP appear in non-relativistic QM generated by the quantum theory of a scalar field (QFT) non-minimally coupled to the space-time metric? 2) To which extent is it in accord with quantization of natural systems? To this end, the asymptotic non-relativistic equation for particle-interpretable wave functions and operators of canonical observables are obtained from the primary QFT objects. It is shown that, in globally static space-time, the Hamilton operators coincide at the origin of the quasi-Euclidean space coordinates in both alternative approaches for any non-minimality constant ξ~\tilde \xiξ~​ , but a certain requirement of the Equivalence Principle to the quantum field propagator distinguishes the unique value ξ~=1/6\tilde \xi = 1/6ξ~​=1/6 = 1/6. Just the same value had the constant ζ in the quantum Hamiltonians arising from the traditional quantizations of natural systems: the DeWitt canonical, Pauli-DeWitt quasiclassical, geometric and Feynman ones, as well as in the revised Schrödinger variational quantization. Thus, the QP generated by mechanics is tightly related to non-minimality of the quantum scalar field. Meanwhile, an essential discrepancy exists between the non-relativistic QMs derived from the two alternative approaches: QFT generates a scalar QP, whereas various quantizations of natural mechanics lead to QPs depending on the choice of space coordinates as physical observables and nonvanishing even in flat space if the coordinates are curvilinear.
This paper is the first of two papers devoted to formulation of quantum mechanics of a particle in a normal geodesic frame of reference in the general Riemannian space-time. Here canonical quantization of geodesic motion in the 1+3-formalism is considered, the result of which will be compared in the subsequent paper II with that of the field-theoretical approach, see also gr-qc/9807030. The Schrödinger representation of quantum-mechanical kinematics and dynamics is presented in the general-covariant form and a physical interpretation of the state vectors and the position operators is discussed.