Physical Review A

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Phase-invariant clock hypothesis for accelerating systems’ ’’

Frank V. Kowalski

Published Jun 1, 1996• 3 citations

Abstract

A response is given to the work of Guangda et al. in which they criticize the paper ‘‘Phase Invariant Clock Hypothesis.’’ © 1996 The American Physical Society.Received 21 September 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.53.4607©1996 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.53.4607

Related papers

Reply to "Comment on `Perturbation expansion of closed-time-path Green's functions' "

Hong-Hua Xu

Controversial points in this Comment concerning the general picture transformations which may give rise to a variety of interaction pictures are analyzed.Received 26 April 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3379©1995 American Physical Society

Physical Review AOct 1, 19950 citations

Further comment on ‘‘Optimization of approximate solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation’’

José M. Maidagan, Rubén Darío Piacentini

We show that the Reply of Weglein [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4025 (1985)] to our previous Comment [Phys. Rev. A 31, 4023 (1985)] is not valid.Received 18 September 1985DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.933©1987 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19870 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Applicability of Hamilton’s equations in the quantum soliton problem’ ’’

David W. Brown, Bruce J. West, Katja Lindenberg

A response is made to the three assertions of Škrinjar, Kapov,and Stojanović [Phys. Rev. A 37, 639 (1988)].Received 24 February 1987DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.37.642©1988 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJan 1, 19889 citations

Comment on “Quantum Clock Synchronization Based on Shared Prior Entanglement”

Eric A. Burt, Christopher R. Ekstrom, Thomas B. Swanson

A Comment on the Letter by Richard Jozsȧ, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2010 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 6 September 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.129801©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersAug 29, 200121 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Identical motion in classical and quantum mechanics’ ”

Adam J. Makowski, S. Konkel

We show briefly that claims in the preceding Comment by Mostafazadeh [Phys. Rev. A 60, 5144 (1999)] are based mostly on an empty premise.Received 14 June 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.5146©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 1, 19992 citations

Comment on “Reduced System Dynamics from theN-Body Schrödinger Equation”

Antoine Royer

Physical Review LettersApr 22, 19960 citations