Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Number-phase uncertainty relations

Tomáš Opatrný

Published Dec 7, 1995• 42 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The minimization problem of finding the number-phase minimum uncertainty states (MUS) is considered and its solutions are found either numerically or, under some special conditions, analytically. The phase uncertainty measure is based on the Bandilla-Paul dispersion. The problem is treated (i) in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space and (ii) for a countably infinite-dimensional Hilbert space (i.e. the standard quantum harmonic oscillator), with the constraint of a given mean photon number. The MUS relations between the photon number uncertainty and phase uncertainty are presented. Connections to some other minimization problems are discussed.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/28/23/034

Related papers

Realistic quantum states of light with minimum phase uncertainty

A. Bandilla, Henryk Paul, H -H Ritze

Starting from a convenient measure for the phase uncertainty delta phi , a rigorous solution to the variational problem in which ( delta phi )2 is minimized under the constraint that the mean photon number N is held fixed, was found. In an approximation valid for large values of N, closed-form expressions for both ( delta phi )2 and the variance of the photon number ( Delta n)2 were obtained. In the final result, the approximation is very similar to an approximation scheme recently discussed by Summy and Pegg Opt. Commun., vol.77, p.75, 1990. The phase uncertainty for the phase optimized states is found to decrease as (N+1)-1 with growing N.

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Oct 1, 1991•57 citations

Quantum states with minimum phase uncertainty for the Süssmann measure

B. Daeubler, C. A. Miller, H. Risken +1 more

We investigate those quantum states, which lead to minimum phase uncertainty for a fixed mean intensity. In contrast to the work of Bandilla, Paul, and Ritze (BPR) we employ instead of the usual variance measure for the phase the Süssmann measure. It turns out that our minimal states are of the form |ψ⟩ ∝ ∑ γ n | n ⟩. Because of this simple expression the phase distribution can be given analytically. It is shown that this distribution is about twice as peaked than the BPR phase minimum states. The Q-function is also obtained. It shows an asymmetry whereas the BPR states lead to a Q-function with a nearly symmetric ellipsoidal shape.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•19 citations

Number-phase uncertainty products and minimizing states

A. Lukš, Vlasta Peřinová

The similarity between the system of the plane rotator and that of the optical oscillator (mode) has been exposed. In both the systems special states have been examined, which minimize the usual and unusual uncertainty relations. Number-sine-cosine uncertainty relations for these systems have been derived and the number-sine minimum-uncertainty states have been investigated in greater detail than in the literature.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1992•21 citations

Number-phase uncertainty product for displaced number states

Istok P. Mendaš, Duska B Popovic

The number-phase uncertainty product for displaced number states of the harmonic oscillator is examined within the framework of three different approaches: (i) the Carruthers-Nieto number-phase uncertainty relation in terms of the Susskind-Glogower sine and cosine phase operators, (ii) a similar relation to this calculated with the Pegg-Barnett unitary phase operator, and (iii) the number-phase uncertainty relation arising from the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase operator. The corresponding number-phase uncertainty product is calculated extending from average photon numbers 30 down to m for the first few classes of displaced number states (m=0,1,...,5). It is found that, for a displaced number state with a reasonable average number of excited quanta, all three rival phase formalisms yield similar number-phase uncertainty products, tending, for increasingly large magnitude of the displacement parameter, to the constant value m+1/2. On the other hand, for a small number of excited quanta it is found that, according to the first two formalisms, the number-phase uncertainty product for a given class of displaced number states tends to the maximum value \ensuremath{\surd}2m+1 /(\ensuremath{\surd}m+1 - \ensuremath{\surd}m ), while the third phase formalism predicts an entirely different behavior; with decreasing magnitude of displacement parameter, after passing through a maximum, the number-phase uncertainty product falls off eventually to zero making, in particular, the search for minimum number-phase uncertainty states futile. It is argued in favor of this last result, and the possibility of experimental verification, in the realm of quantum optics, is briefly considered.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1994•7 citations

Generation of number-phase minimum-uncertainty states and number states

Y. Yamamoto, S. Machida, N. Imoto +2 more

The difference between the two nonclassical photon states, i.e., the squeezed state and the number-phase minimum-uncertainty state, is discussed. Four different generation principles for number-phase minimum-uncertainty states (and number states) are described. They are the following: (1) unitary evolution, using self-phase modulation and interference; (2) nonunitary state reduction, using either quantum nondemolition photon-number measurement or parametrically amplified idler-wave photon counting; (3) negative-feedback oscillators, incorporating a correlated photon-pair generator; and (4) pump-amplitude noise-suppressed lasers. A number-phase minimum-uncertainty state with photon-number noise reduced to 1 dB (20%) below the standard quantum limit in a frequency range over 100 MHz was produced by the fourth-generation principle.

Journal of the Optical Society of America B•Oct 1, 1987•70 citations

Coherent states in a finite-dimensional basis: Their phase properties and relationship to coherent states of light

Vladimír Bužek, A. D. Wilson‐Gordon, P. L. Knight +1 more

The Pegg-Barnett phase-operator formalism utilizes a finite basis set to represent operators of the harmonic oscillator; this enables the phase to be represented by a Hermitian operator, but rests on taking the dimensionality of the basis set to infinity for observable quantities. Simultaneously, in their approach Pegg and Barnett consider quantum states of a harmonic oscillator which are normalized in the Fock space, i.e., the dimensionality of the basis set in which the states of the harmonic oscillator are defined is supposed to be infinite, while the phase operator is defined in the finite-dimensional basis set. In this paper we address the problem of a consistent definition of a coherent state within a finite state basis. We employ displacement operators to define such coherent states and numerically evaluate observables as a function of the size of the basis set. We investigate phase properties of these coherent states. We find that if the dimensionality of the state space is much larger than the mean occupation number of the coherent states, then the results obtained in the finite-dimensional basis are applicable in the case of a ordinary quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator. These coherent states are minimum uncertainty states with respect to quadrature operators (i.e., the position and momentum operators) and do not exhibit quadrature squeezing. A weakly excited (compared with the dimensionality of the state space) coherent state in finite-dimensional basis is not strictly speaking a minimum uncertainty state with respect to the number and phase operators. We give definitions of amplitude and phase squeezing and show that weakly excited coherent states can be amplitude squeezed. In the high-intensity limit (again compared with the dimensionality of the state space) these states exhibit phase squeezing.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1992•89 citations
The minimization problem of finding the number-phase minimum uncertainty states (MUS) is considered and its solutions are found either numerically or, under some special conditions, analytically. The phase uncertainty measure is based on the Bandilla-Paul dispersion. The problem is treated (i) in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space and (ii) for a countably infinite-dimensional Hilbert space (i.e. the standard quantum harmonic oscillator), with the constraint of a given mean photon number. The MUS relations between the photon number uncertainty and phase uncertainty are presented. Connections to some other minimization problems are discussed.
Starting from a convenient measure for the phase uncertainty delta phi , a rigorous solution to the variational problem in which ( delta phi )2 is minimized under the constraint that the mean photon number N is held fixed, was found. In an approximation valid for large values of N, closed-form expressions for both ( delta phi )2 and the variance of the photon number ( Delta n)2 were obtained. In the final result, the approximation is very similar to an approximation scheme recently discussed by Summy and Pegg Opt. Commun., vol.77, p.75, 1990. The phase uncertainty for the phase optimized states is found to decrease as (N+1)-1 with growing N.
We investigate those quantum states, which lead to minimum phase uncertainty for a fixed mean intensity. In contrast to the work of Bandilla, Paul, and Ritze (BPR) we employ instead of the usual variance measure for the phase the Süssmann measure. It turns out that our minimal states are of the form |ψ⟩ ∝ ∑ γ n | n ⟩. Because of this simple expression the phase distribution can be given analytically. It is shown that this distribution is about twice as peaked than the BPR phase minimum states. The Q-function is also obtained. It shows an asymmetry whereas the BPR states lead to a Q-function with a nearly symmetric ellipsoidal shape.
The number-phase uncertainty product for displaced number states of the harmonic oscillator is examined within the framework of three different approaches: (i) the Carruthers-Nieto number-phase uncertainty relation in terms of the Susskind-Glogower sine and cosine phase operators, (ii) a similar relation to this calculated with the Pegg-Barnett unitary phase operator, and (iii) the number-phase uncertainty relation arising from the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase operator. The corresponding number-phase uncertainty product is calculated extending from average photon numbers 30 down to m for the first few classes of displaced number states (m=0,1,...,5). It is found that, for a displaced number state with a reasonable average number of excited quanta, all three rival phase formalisms yield similar number-phase uncertainty products, tending, for increasingly large magnitude of the displacement parameter, to the constant value m+1/2. On the other hand, for a small number of excited quanta it is found that, according to the first two formalisms, the number-phase uncertainty product for a given class of displaced number states tends to the maximum value \ensuremath{\surd}2m+1 /(\ensuremath{\surd}m+1 - \ensuremath{\surd}m ), while the third phase formalism predicts an entirely different behavior; with decreasing magnitude of displacement parameter, after passing through a maximum, the number-phase uncertainty product falls off eventually to zero making, in particular, the search for minimum number-phase uncertainty states futile. It is argued in favor of this last result, and the possibility of experimental verification, in the realm of quantum optics, is briefly considered.
The difference between the two nonclassical photon states, i.e., the squeezed state and the number-phase minimum-uncertainty state, is discussed. Four different generation principles for number-phase minimum-uncertainty states (and number states) are described. They are the following: (1) unitary evolution, using self-phase modulation and interference; (2) nonunitary state reduction, using either quantum nondemolition photon-number measurement or parametrically amplified idler-wave photon counting; (3) negative-feedback oscillators, incorporating a correlated photon-pair generator; and (4) pump-amplitude noise-suppressed lasers. A number-phase minimum-uncertainty state with photon-number noise reduced to 1 dB (20%) below the standard quantum limit in a frequency range over 100 MHz was produced by the fourth-generation principle.
The Pegg-Barnett phase-operator formalism utilizes a finite basis set to represent operators of the harmonic oscillator; this enables the phase to be represented by a Hermitian operator, but rests on taking the dimensionality of the basis set to infinity for observable quantities. Simultaneously, in their approach Pegg and Barnett consider quantum states of a harmonic oscillator which are normalized in the Fock space, i.e., the dimensionality of the basis set in which the states of the harmonic oscillator are defined is supposed to be infinite, while the phase operator is defined in the finite-dimensional basis set. In this paper we address the problem of a consistent definition of a coherent state within a finite state basis. We employ displacement operators to define such coherent states and numerically evaluate observables as a function of the size of the basis set. We investigate phase properties of these coherent states. We find that if the dimensionality of the state space is much larger than the mean occupation number of the coherent states, then the results obtained in the finite-dimensional basis are applicable in the case of a ordinary quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator. These coherent states are minimum uncertainty states with respect to quadrature operators (i.e., the position and momentum operators) and do not exhibit quadrature squeezing. A weakly excited (compared with the dimensionality of the state space) coherent state in finite-dimensional basis is not strictly speaking a minimum uncertainty state with respect to the number and phase operators. We give definitions of amplitude and phase squeezing and show that weakly excited coherent states can be amplitude squeezed. In the high-intensity limit (again compared with the dimensionality of the state space) these states exhibit phase squeezing.