Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

Heisenberg and the early days of quantum mechanics

Felix Bloch

Published Dec 1, 1976• 58 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It is appropriate in this year, when we celebrate the 50th anniversary of quantum mechanics, and during which we have been saddened by the death of one of its leading founders, Werner Heisenberg, to reminisce about the formative years of the new mechanics. At the time when the foundations of physics were being replaced with totally new concepts I was a student of physics. I sat in the colloquium audience when Peter Debye made the suggestions to Erwin Schrödinger that started him on the study of de Broglie waves and the search for their wave equation. It was from Heisenberg, as his first doctorate student, that I caught the spirit of research, and that I received the encouragement to make my own contributions.

DOI
10.1063/1.3024633

Related papers

Memories of electrons in crystals

Felix Bloch

Abstract As a student in Zurich, it was my good fortune to be present at the colloquium in which Schrödinger told the first time about his wave mechanics. When both he and Debye accepted positions in Germany I decided upon the latter’s advice to continue my studies under Heisenberg in Leipzig, where I arrived in the autumn of 1927. Already in Zurich my interests had turned from experimental to theoretical physics, and particularly towards quantum mechanics, and before coming to Leipzig I had started some calculations on the radiation-damping of wave-packets. As the first thing, Heisenberg encouraged me to complete this work, later published in the Physikalische Zeitschrift, whereupon he considered me ready to start on a topic for my Ph.D. thesis.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Jun 10, 1980•12 citations

Interpretation of quantum mechanics from the dynamics of ideal measurement

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

This year we celebrate the centennial of quantum mechanics, its incubation as wave mechanics by de Broglie and Schrödinger, and as matrix mechanics by Heisenberg, Born and Jordan. Its great potential has transformed the world forever, most notably through two quantum revolutions, the first one in the 20th century, and the second one emerging now.

Europhysics news•Jan 1, 2025•3 citations

The third way to quantum mechanics is the forgotten first

S. Antoci, Dierck Ekkehard Liebscher

Quantum mechanics can be formulated in three ways, as Heisenberg, Schrödinger and Feynman did respectively. For the last way, an unknown (i.e. forgotten) forerunner exists, that we have found in a paper by Gregor Wentzel, published before the famous works by Heisenberg and Schrödinger, and contemporary with the fundamental works of L. de Broglie. In that paper, one can find the basic formulae and their interpretation as they were adopted by Feynman twenty years later. We believe that Wentzel's work was forgotten for several reasons: (I) Schrödinger's equation was much simpler to deal with (Wentzel himself contributed to its development in the same way as L.Brillouin and H.Kramers did). (II) The first application was rejected by Heisenberg and Kramers. (III) The approximation used by Wentzel was too na\"ıve and failed. Nevertheless, the foundation laid by Wentzel was sound, as it has been shown by Feynman's work. Therefore, Wentzel has to be considered as one of the founders of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:physics/9704028•Apr 28, 1997•7 citations

Waves and particles

Louis de Broglie

When in the spring of 1926 Erwin Schrödinger set out the form of the equation for wave propagation and drew important conclusions from it, in some very elegant work which appeared to develop the ideas which I had introduced in 1923–24 (de Broglie 1924), he really profoundly modified the ideas which had guided me two years earlier in my original research. For his idea was that although the ψ wave which he was introducing was still a true physical wave propagated in space and time, it would not have any single area of high field concentration which could be a particle; whereas in my original concept I assumed that the coexistence of waves and particles, perceived by Einstein in 1905 in respect of light in his theory of light quanta, should be extended to all types of particle in the form of the coexistence of a physical wave with a particle incorporated in it.

Physics Bulletin•Mar 1, 1971•0 citations

Werner Heisenberg and the Birth of Quantum Mechanics

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Feb 1, 2001•0 citations

Fundamental considerations inspired by quantum physics

Anton Zeilinger

I have been interested in quantum mechanics or, synonymously, quantum physics since the very days when I first learned about them as a student. The initial impression was that of an immense mathematical beauty of the formalism of quantum mechanics. The second impression was the fantastic agreement of the theoretical predictions of quantum physics for experiments, and the third and somewhat surprising impression was that there was widespread disagreement about the interpretation of the new theory.

Libreria Editrice Vaticana eBooks•Dec 3, 2025•0 citations
It is appropriate in this year, when we celebrate the 50th anniversary of quantum mechanics, and during which we have been saddened by the death of one of its leading founders, Werner Heisenberg, to reminisce about the formative years of the new mechanics. At the time when the foundations of physics were being replaced with totally new concepts I was a student of physics. I sat in the colloquium audience when Peter Debye made the suggestions to Erwin Schrödinger that started him on the study of de Broglie waves and the search for their wave equation. It was from Heisenberg, as his first doctorate student, that I caught the spirit of research, and that I received the encouragement to make my own contributions.
Abstract As a student in Zurich, it was my good fortune to be present at the colloquium in which Schrödinger told the first time about his wave mechanics. When both he and Debye accepted positions in Germany I decided upon the latter’s advice to continue my studies under Heisenberg in Leipzig, where I arrived in the autumn of 1927. Already in Zurich my interests had turned from experimental to theoretical physics, and particularly towards quantum mechanics, and before coming to Leipzig I had started some calculations on the radiation-damping of wave-packets. As the first thing, Heisenberg encouraged me to complete this work, later published in the Physikalische Zeitschrift, whereupon he considered me ready to start on a topic for my Ph.D. thesis.
Quantum mechanics can be formulated in three ways, as Heisenberg, Schrödinger and Feynman did respectively. For the last way, an unknown (i.e. forgotten) forerunner exists, that we have found in a paper by Gregor Wentzel, published before the famous works by Heisenberg and Schrödinger, and contemporary with the fundamental works of L. de Broglie. In that paper, one can find the basic formulae and their interpretation as they were adopted by Feynman twenty years later. We believe that Wentzel's work was forgotten for several reasons: (I) Schrödinger's equation was much simpler to deal with (Wentzel himself contributed to its development in the same way as L.Brillouin and H.Kramers did). (II) The first application was rejected by Heisenberg and Kramers. (III) The approximation used by Wentzel was too na\"ıve and failed. Nevertheless, the foundation laid by Wentzel was sound, as it has been shown by Feynman's work. Therefore, Wentzel has to be considered as one of the founders of quantum mechanics.
When in the spring of 1926 Erwin Schrödinger set out the form of the equation for wave propagation and drew important conclusions from it, in some very elegant work which appeared to develop the ideas which I had introduced in 1923–24 (de Broglie 1924), he really profoundly modified the ideas which had guided me two years earlier in my original research. For his idea was that although the ψ wave which he was introducing was still a true physical wave propagated in space and time, it would not have any single area of high field concentration which could be a particle; whereas in my original concept I assumed that the coexistence of waves and particles, perceived by Einstein in 1905 in respect of light in his theory of light quanta, should be extended to all types of particle in the form of the coexistence of a physical wave with a particle incorporated in it.
I have been interested in quantum mechanics or, synonymously, quantum physics since the very days when I first learned about them as a student. The initial impression was that of an immense mathematical beauty of the formalism of quantum mechanics. The second impression was the fantastic agreement of the theoretical predictions of quantum physics for experiments, and the third and somewhat surprising impression was that there was widespread disagreement about the interpretation of the new theory.