Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chinese Physics Letters

A Two-Party Probabilistic Communication Complexity Scenario via Werner States

Xue Peng, LI Chuan-feng, Guo Guang-Can

Published Sep 19, 2001• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We propose a probabilistic two-party communication complexity scenario with a prior Werner state and analyse the communication abilities of quantum correlations (entanglements) and classical correlations. This process can be used as an entanglement monotone of Werner states.
DOI
10.1088/0256-307x/18/10/303

Related papers

Reducing the communication complexity with quantum entanglement

Peng Xue, Yun‐Feng Huang, Yong-Sheng Zhang +2 more

We propose a probabilistic two-party communication complexity scenario with a prior nonmaximally entangled state, which results in less communication than is required with only classical random correlations. A simple all-optical implementation of this protocol is presented and demonstrates our conclusion.

arXiv:quant-ph/0012052•Physical Review A•Aug 13, 2001•14 citations

Deterministically Reducing the Communication Complexity with Quantum Entanglement

Bin Cao

We propose a two-party deterministic communication complexity scenario with a set of pairs of particles in an arbitrary pure entangled state. For an arbitrary two-variable Boolean function, the prior entanglement results in less communication than that is required with only classical random correlations.

Acta Sinica Quantum Optica•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement and Communication Complexity

Harry Buhrman, Richard Cleve, Wim van Dam

We consider a variation of the multi-party communication complexity scenario where the parties are supplied with an extra resource: particles in an entangled quantum state. We show that, although a prior quantum entanglement cannot be used to simulate a communication channel, it can reduce the communication complexity of functions in some cases. Specifically, we show that, for a particular function among three parties (each of which possesses part of the function's input), a prior quantum entanglement enables them to learn the value of the function with only three bits of communication occurring among the parties, whereas, without quantum entanglement, four bits of communication are necessary. We also show that, for a particular two-party probabilistic communication complexity problem, quantum entanglement results in less communication than is required with only classical random correlations (instead of quantum entanglement). These results are a noteworthy contrast to the well-known fact that quantum entanglement cannot be used to actually simulate communication among remote parties.

BRICS Report Series•Jun 10, 1997•21 citations

Three-party quantum communication complexity via entangled tripartite pure states

Peng Xue, Chuan‐Feng Li, Yongsheng Zhang +1 more

We propose a probabilistic three-party communication complexity scenario: with a prior entangled tripartite pure state, to learn the value of a particular function determined by each communication player. It results in less communication than is required with only classical random correlations. If they share a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state, this protocol is deterministic.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Jul 4, 2001•4 citations

Entanglement assisted communication complexity measured by distinguishability

Satyaki Manna, Ankush Pandit, Anubhav Chaturvedi +1 more

We investigate the quantum advantage that can arise in typical two-party communication scenarios, where the sender and the receiver are allowed to share prior correlations. Focusing on communication tasks constrained by the distinguishability of the sender's inputs, we demonstrate that entanglement-assisted communication with both classical and quantum message can outperform classical communication supplemented with shared randomness. We begin by developing a general framework for communication tasks with pre-shared correlations. Within this framework, we establish an equivalence among entanglement-assisted classical communication, entanglement-assisted quantum communication, and quantum communication, showing that no hierarchy exists between these three paradigms. We then investigate the scenario where the receiver has no input and prove that no advantage can arise in this case. However, an advantage in the entanglement-assisted setting emerges once additional constraints are imposed on the dimension of the communicated message. This further highlights the superiority of entanglement-assisted classical communication over standard quantum communication. Then we demonstrate several tasks where the entanglement-assisted protocol using one-bit communication proves to be advantageous over classical communication. Finally, by constructing an explicit class of communication tasks, we show that a non-maximally entangled states outperform the maximally entangled state as a pre-shared resource between the communicating parties.

quant-pharXiv:2603.19105•Mar 20, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement and Communication Complexity

Harry Buhrman, Richard Cleve, Wim van Dam

We consider a variation of the communication complexity scenario, where the parties are supplied with an extra resource: particles in an entangled quantum state. We note that "quantum nonlocality" can be naturally expressed in the language of communication complexity. These are communication complexity problems where the "output" is embodied in the correlations between the outputs of the individual parties. Without entanglement, the parties must communicate to produce the required correlations; whereas, with entanglement, no communication is necessary to produce the correlations. In this sense, nonlocality proofs can also be viewed as communication complexity problems where the presence of quantum entanglement reduces the amount of necessary communication. We show how to transform examples of nonlocality into more traditional communication complexity problems, where the output is explicitly determined by each individual party. The resulting problems require communication with or without entanglement, but the required communication is less when entanglement is available. All these results are a noteworthy contrast to the well-known fact that entanglement cannot be used to actually simulate or compress classical communication between remote parties.

arXiv:quant-ph/9705033•SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2001•142 citations
We consider a variation of the multi-party communication complexity scenario where the parties are supplied with an extra resource: particles in an entangled quantum state. We show that, although a prior quantum entanglement cannot be used to simulate a communication channel, it can reduce the communication complexity of functions in some cases. Specifically, we show that, for a particular function among three parties (each of which possesses part of the function's input), a prior quantum entanglement enables them to learn the value of the function with only three bits of communication occurring among the parties, whereas, without quantum entanglement, four bits of communication are necessary. We also show that, for a particular two-party probabilistic communication complexity problem, quantum entanglement results in less communication than is required with only classical random correlations (instead of quantum entanglement). These results are a noteworthy contrast to the well-known fact that quantum entanglement cannot be used to actually simulate communication among remote parties.
We investigate the quantum advantage that can arise in typical two-party communication scenarios, where the sender and the receiver are allowed to share prior correlations. Focusing on communication tasks constrained by the distinguishability of the sender's inputs, we demonstrate that entanglement-assisted communication with both classical and quantum message can outperform classical communication supplemented with shared randomness. We begin by developing a general framework for communication tasks with pre-shared correlations. Within this framework, we establish an equivalence among entanglement-assisted classical communication, entanglement-assisted quantum communication, and quantum communication, showing that no hierarchy exists between these three paradigms. We then investigate the scenario where the receiver has no input and prove that no advantage can arise in this case. However, an advantage in the entanglement-assisted setting emerges once additional constraints are imposed on the dimension of the communicated message. This further highlights the superiority of entanglement-assisted classical communication over standard quantum communication. Then we demonstrate several tasks where the entanglement-assisted protocol using one-bit communication proves to be advantageous over classical communication. Finally, by constructing an explicit class of communication tasks, we show that a non-maximally entangled states outperform the maximally entangled state as a pre-shared resource between the communicating parties.
We consider a variation of the communication complexity scenario, where the parties are supplied with an extra resource: particles in an entangled quantum state. We note that "quantum nonlocality" can be naturally expressed in the language of communication complexity. These are communication complexity problems where the "output" is embodied in the correlations between the outputs of the individual parties. Without entanglement, the parties must communicate to produce the required correlations; whereas, with entanglement, no communication is necessary to produce the correlations. In this sense, nonlocality proofs can also be viewed as communication complexity problems where the presence of quantum entanglement reduces the amount of necessary communication. We show how to transform examples of nonlocality into more traditional communication complexity problems, where the output is explicitly determined by each individual party. The resulting problems require communication with or without entanglement, but the required communication is less when entanglement is available. All these results are a noteworthy contrast to the well-known fact that entanglement cannot be used to actually simulate or compress classical communication between remote parties.