Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica C Superconductivity

Coexistence between checkerboarded charge and striped spin in two-dimensional Hubbard model

Mitake Miyazaki, Yamaji K., Takashi Yanagisawa, R. Kadono

Published Nov 5, 2009• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physc.2009.10.125

Related papers

Charge localization and stripes in a two-dimensional three-band Peierls-Hubbard model

J. Tinka Gammel, Zheyin Yu, Jianfeng Zang +1 more

APS•Mar 1, 1998•0 citations

Spin and charge fluctuations of the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Yasushi Shiina

Abstracts of the meeting of the Physical Society of Japan. Sectional meeting•Sep 12, 1995•0 citations

Quantum phase transitions in the two-dimensional hardcore boson model

F. Hébert, G. G. Batrouni, R. T. Scalettar +3 more

We use two quantum Monte Carlo algorithms to map out the phase diagram of the two-dimensional hardcore boson Hubbard model with near ${(V}_{1})$ and next near ${(V}_{2})$ neighbor repulsion. At half filling we find three phases: superfluid (SF), checkerboard solid, and striped solid depending on the relative values of ${V}_{1}{,V}_{2},$ and the kinetic energy. Doping away from half filling, the checkerboard solid undergoes phase separation: The superfluid and solid phases coexist but not as a single thermodynamic phase. As a function of doping, the transition from the checkerboard solid is therefore first order. In contrast, doping the striped solid away from half filling instead produces a striped supersolid phase: coexistence of density order with superfluidity as a single phase. One surprising result is that the entire line of transitions between the SF and checkerboard solid phases at half filling appears to exhibit dynamical $O(3)$ symmetry restoration. The transitions appear to be in the same universality class as the special Heisenberg point even though this symmetry is explicitly broken by the ${V}_{2}$ interaction.

arXiv:cond-mat/0105450•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Dec 5, 2001•188 citations

Coexisting magnetic, charge, and superconducting orders in the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Robin Scholle, Pietro M. Bonetti, Walter Metzner +1 more

We perform a renormalized mean-field study of the two-dimensional repulsive Hubbard model, focusing on the intricate interplay and possible coexistence of magnetic, charge, and superconducting orders. We improve on conventional mean-field theory by utilizing a renormalization group framework that captures high-energy fluctuations. This method generates effective magnetic and d -wave pairing interactions, and allows for an unbiased exploration of coexisting phases at weak and moderate interaction strengths. Unrestricted mean-field calculations of the effective Hamiltonian on large finite lattices are combined with analyses in the thermodynamic limit, revealing a rich phase diagram with extensive regions of coexisting orders. We find that d -wave superconductivity coexists with Néel order on the electron-doped side. On the hole-doped side, superconductivity is found to coexist with spiral or stripe magnetic orders. Within the stripe-ordered region, the superconducting order parameter is spatially modulated, with a period that follows the charge modulation of the stripes. Below Van Hove filling, pairing provides the primary energy gain, while the stripe order yields only a small, and hence fragile, additional energy lowering.

arXiv:2602.20073•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jul 28, 2026•0 citations

Charge and Spin separation in the Hubbard model in one dimension

V. E. Korepin

APS•Mar 1, 2001•0 citations

Spin-charge separation in the 1D Hubbard model

Mona Berciu, Sajeev John

APS•Mar 1, 2000•0 citations
We use two quantum Monte Carlo algorithms to map out the phase diagram of the two-dimensional hardcore boson Hubbard model with near (V1){(V}_{1})(V1​) and next near (V2){(V}_{2})(V2​) neighbor repulsion. At half filling we find three phases: superfluid (SF), checkerboard solid, and striped solid depending on the relative values of V1,V2,{V}_{1}{,V}_{2},V1​,V2​, and the kinetic energy. Doping away from half filling, the checkerboard solid undergoes phase separation: The superfluid and solid phases coexist but not as a single thermodynamic phase. As a function of doping, the transition from the checkerboard solid is therefore first order. In contrast, doping the striped solid away from half filling instead produces a striped supersolid phase: coexistence of density order with superfluidity as a single phase. One surprising result is that the entire line of transitions between the SF and checkerboard solid phases at half filling appears to exhibit dynamical O(3)O(3)O(3) symmetry restoration. The transitions appear to be in the same universality class as the special Heisenberg point even though this symmetry is explicitly broken by the V2{V}_{2}V2​ interaction.
We perform a renormalized mean-field study of the two-dimensional repulsive Hubbard model, focusing on the intricate interplay and possible coexistence of magnetic, charge, and superconducting orders. We improve on conventional mean-field theory by utilizing a renormalization group framework that captures high-energy fluctuations. This method generates effective magnetic and d -wave pairing interactions, and allows for an unbiased exploration of coexisting phases at weak and moderate interaction strengths. Unrestricted mean-field calculations of the effective Hamiltonian on large finite lattices are combined with analyses in the thermodynamic limit, revealing a rich phase diagram with extensive regions of coexisting orders. We find that d -wave superconductivity coexists with Néel order on the electron-doped side. On the hole-doped side, superconductivity is found to coexist with spiral or stripe magnetic orders. Within the stripe-ordered region, the superconducting order parameter is spatially modulated, with a period that follows the charge modulation of the stripes. Below Van Hove filling, pairing provides the primary energy gain, while the stripe order yields only a small, and hence fragile, additional energy lowering.