Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Canonical scattering transformation in quantum mechanics

F. Guillod, P. Huguenin

Published Dec 1, 1982• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The authors quantise the classical canonical scattering transformation of Hunziker (1968) with the representation method of Moshinsky and Seligmann (1977). This leads to a sheeted phase space characterised by the number of turns around the scatterer. The usual detection device projects on the trivial representation of the corresponding ambiguity group. This operation extracts the integer values of the angular momentum.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/15/12/022

Related papers

Wigner distribution functions and the representation of a non-bijective canonical transformation in quantum mechanics

Rainer Dirl, Peter Kasperkovitz, M. Moshińsky

In a previous paper, with a similar title, the authors showed that for bijective (i.e. one-to-one onto) canonical transformations they can obtain their quantum mechanical representations in the form of a kernel in the phase space of Wigner distribution functions and recover the classical expectation for this kernel in the limit to 0. For non-bijective canonical transformations the situation is more complex as the phase space acquires either a Riemann surface structure or requires the introduction of the concept of an ambiguity group. By discussing the non-bijective canonical transformation taking them from an oscillator of frequency kappa -1 , where kappa is an integer, to one of unit frequency, they see how the kernel is generalised to include the indices associated with the irreducible representations of the ambiguity group, i.e. the ambiguity spins. They obtain the kernel explicitly and show that in the limit to 0 they recover the form that they expect in the Riemann surface picture of their phase space. While they illustrate their analysis through the representation in Wigner distribution phase space of a specific non-bijective canonical transformation, the procedure is clearly extendable to the representations of general canonical transformations of this type.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 21, 1988•15 citations

Study on Linear Canonical Transformation in a Framework of a Phase Space Representation of Quantum Mechanics

Raoelina Andriambololona

We present a study on linear canonical transformation in the framework of a phase space representation of quantum mechanics that we have introduced in our previous work [1]. We begin with a brief recall about the so called phase space representation. We give the definition of linear canonical transformation with the transformation law of coordinate and momentum operators. We establish successively the transformation laws of mean values, dispersions, basis state and wave functions. Then we introduce the concept of isodispersion linear canonical transformation.

arXiv:1503.02449•International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 2015•6 citations

Representation of quantum mechanical wavefunctions by transformation generators. III. Canonical transformations in an extended phase space

C Jung, H. Krüger

For pt.II see ibid., vol.16, no.7, p.1397-408 (1983). It is shown how quantum mechanical wavefunctions can be obtained from a sequence of simple canonical transformations, which map the given system onto a simple reference system. The resulting wavefunctions are at least uniformly valid up to order h(cross). Under some more restrictive conditions for the individual transformation steps the authors even find the exact wavefunctions. The essential point of the paper is to enlarge the conventional coordinate-momentum phase space by taking time and energy as an additional conjugate pair. In this extended space they exploit the possibility of using transformations which intermix energy and time with position coordinates and momenta. Compared with transformations in the conventional position-momentum phase space, they gain the advantage that scattering states and bound states can be treated in a unified way. Therefore this method is appropriate for systems with mixed spectra. In addition it allows for more flexibility in choosing the individual transformation steps. The practicability of the method is demonstrated by several examples.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 1, 1984•0 citations

Canonical transforms. I. Complex linear transforms

Kurt Bernardo Wolf

Recent work by Moshinsky et al. on the role and applications of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics has focused attention on some complex extensions of linear transformations mapping the position and momentum operators x̂ and p̂ to a pair η̂ and ζ̂ of canonically conjugate, but not necessarily Hermitian, operators. In this paper we show that for a continuum of complex linear canonical transformations, a related Hilbert space of entire analytic functions exists with a scalar product over the complex plane such that the pair η̂, ζ̂ can be realized in the Schrödinger representation η and −id/dη. We provide a unitary mapping onto the ordinary Hilbert space of square-integrable functions over the real line through an integral transform. The transform kernels provide a representation of a subsemigroup of SL(2,C). The well-known Bargmann transform is the special case when η̂ and iζ̂ are the harmonic oscillator raising and lowering operators. The Moshinsky-Quesne transform is regained in the limit when the canonical transformation becomes real, a case which contains the ordinary Fourier transform. We present a realization of these transforms through hyperdifferential operators.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1974•133 citations

Wigner distribution for angle coordinates in quantum mechanics

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

The method of Wigner distribution functions, and the Weyl correspondence between quantum and classical variables, are extended from the usual kind of canonically conjugate position and momentum operators to the case of an angle and angular momentum operator pair. The sense in which one has a description of quantum mechanics using classical phase-space language is much clarified by this extension.

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1979•74 citations

Nonbijective canonical transformations and their representation in quantum mechanics

Peter Krämer, M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1978•29 citations
The authors quantise the classical canonical scattering transformation of Hunziker (1968) with the representation method of Moshinsky and Seligmann (1977). This leads to a sheeted phase space characterised by the number of turns around the scatterer. The usual detection device projects on the trivial representation of the corresponding ambiguity group. This operation extracts the integer values of the angular momentum.
In a previous paper, with a similar title, the authors showed that for bijective (i.e. one-to-one onto) canonical transformations they can obtain their quantum mechanical representations in the form of a kernel in the phase space of Wigner distribution functions and recover the classical expectation for this kernel in the limit to 0. For non-bijective canonical transformations the situation is more complex as the phase space acquires either a Riemann surface structure or requires the introduction of the concept of an ambiguity group. By discussing the non-bijective canonical transformation taking them from an oscillator of frequency kappa -1 , where kappa is an integer, to one of unit frequency, they see how the kernel is generalised to include the indices associated with the irreducible representations of the ambiguity group, i.e. the ambiguity spins. They obtain the kernel explicitly and show that in the limit to 0 they recover the form that they expect in the Riemann surface picture of their phase space. While they illustrate their analysis through the representation in Wigner distribution phase space of a specific non-bijective canonical transformation, the procedure is clearly extendable to the representations of general canonical transformations of this type.
We present a study on linear canonical transformation in the framework of a phase space representation of quantum mechanics that we have introduced in our previous work [1]. We begin with a brief recall about the so called phase space representation. We give the definition of linear canonical transformation with the transformation law of coordinate and momentum operators. We establish successively the transformation laws of mean values, dispersions, basis state and wave functions. Then we introduce the concept of isodispersion linear canonical transformation.
For pt.II see ibid., vol.16, no.7, p.1397-408 (1983). It is shown how quantum mechanical wavefunctions can be obtained from a sequence of simple canonical transformations, which map the given system onto a simple reference system. The resulting wavefunctions are at least uniformly valid up to order h(cross). Under some more restrictive conditions for the individual transformation steps the authors even find the exact wavefunctions. The essential point of the paper is to enlarge the conventional coordinate-momentum phase space by taking time and energy as an additional conjugate pair. In this extended space they exploit the possibility of using transformations which intermix energy and time with position coordinates and momenta. Compared with transformations in the conventional position-momentum phase space, they gain the advantage that scattering states and bound states can be treated in a unified way. Therefore this method is appropriate for systems with mixed spectra. In addition it allows for more flexibility in choosing the individual transformation steps. The practicability of the method is demonstrated by several examples.
Recent work by Moshinsky et al. on the role and applications of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics has focused attention on some complex extensions of linear transformations mapping the position and momentum operators x̂ and p̂ to a pair η̂ and ζ̂ of canonically conjugate, but not necessarily Hermitian, operators. In this paper we show that for a continuum of complex linear canonical transformations, a related Hilbert space of entire analytic functions exists with a scalar product over the complex plane such that the pair η̂, ζ̂ can be realized in the Schrödinger representation η and −id/dη. We provide a unitary mapping onto the ordinary Hilbert space of square-integrable functions over the real line through an integral transform. The transform kernels provide a representation of a subsemigroup of SL(2,C). The well-known Bargmann transform is the special case when η̂ and iζ̂ are the harmonic oscillator raising and lowering operators. The Moshinsky-Quesne transform is regained in the limit when the canonical transformation becomes real, a case which contains the ordinary Fourier transform. We present a realization of these transforms through hyperdifferential operators.
In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.