Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Bargmann invariant and the geometry of the Güoy effect

R. Simon, Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

Published Feb 15, 1993• 120 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We bring out the connection between Berry's geometric phase and a gauge invariant expression introduced by Bargmann. We exploit this relationship to show that the G\"uoy effect, which referes to the phase jump experienced by a focused beam as it crosses the caustic, is the geometric phase associated with the underlying Lobachevskian hyperbolic geometry.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.70.880

Related papers

Bargmann invariants and geometric phases: A generalized connection

Eqab M. Rabei, Arvind, Narasimhaiengar Mukunda +1 more

We develop the broadest possible generalization of the well known connection between quantum-mechanical Bargmann invariants and geometric phases. The key concept is that of null phase curves in quantum-mechanical ray and Hilbert spaces. Examples of such curves are developed. Our generalization is shown to be essential for properly understanding geometric phase results in the cases of coherent states and of Gaussian states. Differential geometric aspects of null phase curves are also briefly explored.

arXiv:quant-ph/9907080•Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1999•47 citations

Aharonov-Casher effect and geometrical phases

R Mignani

The phaseshift experienced by a neutral particle with a magnetic moment as it encircles an infinite line of charge (Aharonov-Casher effect) (1984) is derived as a special case of geometrical phases, i.e. the standard Berry phase and the gauge-invariant Yang phase.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 21, 1991•25 citations

Gauge- and Galilei-invariant Geometric Phases

Guido Bacciagaluppi

Neither geometric phases nor differences in geometric phases are generally invariant under time-dependent unitary transformations (unlike differences in total phases), in particular under local gauge transformations and Galilei transformations. (This was pointed out originally by Aharonov and Anandan, and in the case of Galilei transformations has recently been shown explicitly by Sjoeqvist, Brown and Carlsen.) In this paper, I introduce a phase, related to the standard geometric phase, for which phase differences are both gauge- and Galilei-invariant, and, indeed, invariant under transformations to linearly accelerated coordinate systems. I discuss in what sense this phase can also be viewed as geometric, what its relation is to earlier proposals for making geometric phases invariant under gauge or Galilei transformations, and what is its classical analogue. I finally apply this invariant phase to Berry's derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.

•Dec 1, 1997•0 citations

Bargmann invariants, null phase curves, and a theory of the geometric phase

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda, Arvind, Elisa Ercolessi +3 more

We present a theory of the geometric phase based logically on the Bargmann invariant of quantum mechanics, and null phase curves in ray space, as the fundamental ingredients. Null phase curves are themselves defined entirely in terms of the (third order) Bargmann invariant, and it is shown that these are the curves natural to geometric phase theory, rather than geodesics used in earlier treatments. The natural symplectic structure in ray space is seen to play a crucial role in the definition of the geometric phase. Logical consistency of the formulation is explicitly shown, and the principal properties of geometric phases are deduced as systematic consequences.

Physical Review A•Apr 29, 2003•28 citations

Comprehensive Review of Gauge and Reparameterization Invariant Geometric Phase for Open Quantum Systems Under the Most General Conditions

Abhirup Chatterjee, Sobhan Kumar Sounda

The concept of Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated en- tirely in terms of geometric structure of complex Hilbert Space. This tutorial article gives a general mathematical overview of the Geometric phase introduced by Berry with the conditions over the system’s evolution embedded through adiabaticity and cyclicity, which were subsequently relaxed sequentially by Aharonov-Anandan, Samuel-Bhandari, and later by Mukunda and Simon by using the idea of Bargmann Invariants. The arti- cle presents a thorough and illustrative overview regarding the mathematical derivation behind the upliftment of the conditions, which results in the generalized definition of the Geometric phase for quantum systems. In addition to that, the article also gives an overall idea about the general analytical aspects of finding the Geometric phase for three level open quantum systems undergoing decoherence and dephasing due to interaction with the surroundings in the weak system reservoir coupling limit described by quantum master equations.

•Nov 17, 2025•0 citations

Effective Geometry and Berry Connection A Geometric Formulation of Quantum Phases and Emergent Gauge Structure

Ijaz Durrani

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
We bring out the connection between Berry's geometric phase and a gauge invariant expression introduced by Bargmann. We exploit this relationship to show that the G"uoy effect, which referes to the phase jump experienced by a focused beam as it crosses the caustic, is the geometric phase associated with the underlying Lobachevskian hyperbolic geometry.
We develop the broadest possible generalization of the well known connection between quantum-mechanical Bargmann invariants and geometric phases. The key concept is that of null phase curves in quantum-mechanical ray and Hilbert spaces. Examples of such curves are developed. Our generalization is shown to be essential for properly understanding geometric phase results in the cases of coherent states and of Gaussian states. Differential geometric aspects of null phase curves are also briefly explored.
Neither geometric phases nor differences in geometric phases are generally invariant under time-dependent unitary transformations (unlike differences in total phases), in particular under local gauge transformations and Galilei transformations. (This was pointed out originally by Aharonov and Anandan, and in the case of Galilei transformations has recently been shown explicitly by Sjoeqvist, Brown and Carlsen.) In this paper, I introduce a phase, related to the standard geometric phase, for which phase differences are both gauge- and Galilei-invariant, and, indeed, invariant under transformations to linearly accelerated coordinate systems. I discuss in what sense this phase can also be viewed as geometric, what its relation is to earlier proposals for making geometric phases invariant under gauge or Galilei transformations, and what is its classical analogue. I finally apply this invariant phase to Berry's derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
We present a theory of the geometric phase based logically on the Bargmann invariant of quantum mechanics, and null phase curves in ray space, as the fundamental ingredients. Null phase curves are themselves defined entirely in terms of the (third order) Bargmann invariant, and it is shown that these are the curves natural to geometric phase theory, rather than geodesics used in earlier treatments. The natural symplectic structure in ray space is seen to play a crucial role in the definition of the geometric phase. Logical consistency of the formulation is explicitly shown, and the principal properties of geometric phases are deduced as systematic consequences.
The concept of Geometric Phase in Quantum Mechanics is generally formulated en- tirely in terms of geometric structure of complex Hilbert Space. This tutorial article gives a general mathematical overview of the Geometric phase introduced by Berry with the conditions over the system’s evolution embedded through adiabaticity and cyclicity, which were subsequently relaxed sequentially by Aharonov-Anandan, Samuel-Bhandari, and later by Mukunda and Simon by using the idea of Bargmann Invariants. The arti- cle presents a thorough and illustrative overview regarding the mathematical derivation behind the upliftment of the conditions, which results in the generalized definition of the Geometric phase for quantum systems. In addition to that, the article also gives an overall idea about the general analytical aspects of finding the Geometric phase for three level open quantum systems undergoing decoherence and dephasing due to interaction with the surroundings in the weak system reservoir coupling limit described by quantum master equations.