Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mysteries, Puzzles, and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics

The non-paradox of superluminal tunneling, and a planned experiment to study the real mystery

Aephraim M. Steinberg, Stefan H. Myrskog, Han Seb Moon, Hyun Ah Kim, J. K. Fox, Jung Bog Kim

Published Jan 1, 1999• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.57849

Related papers

Tunneling time, the Hartman effect, and superluminality: A proposed resolution of an old paradox

Herbert G. Winful

Physics Reports•Nov 8, 2006•374 citations

Photonic Tunneling Experiments: Superluminal Tunneling

G. Nimtz, Axel Enders, Harald Spieker

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•4 citations

Quantum Tunneling as Virtual Domain Excursion: Resolving Barrier Penetration Through Dual Regulator Framework

Eric Needham

This paper presents a finite, physical resolution of quantum tunneling within the Dual Regulator Framework, interpreting barrier penetration as a temporary excursion into the virtual domain rather than a paradoxical traversal of classically forbidden space. In this framework, particles encountering a potential barrier transition from the real domain (on-shell, position space, RG-regulated) into a virtual domain (off-shell, momentum space, Λφ-regulated), where position-space potentials are undefined. After traversing the barrier off-shell, particles re-emerge into the real domain on the opposite side. Energy conservation is preserved through finite energy–time uncertainty, without invoking nonphysical violations. The formalism yields a modified tunneling length scale and probability law, introducing a universal Λφ correction to standard WKB results. This leads to quantitative, testable predictions across multiple systems, including: alpha decay half-lives with sub-percent accuracy across the periodic table, scanning tunneling microscope current–distance relations with φ-harmonic structure, ammonia inversion frequency corrected by a (1 + Λφ/π) factor matching experiment, tunneling time saturation consistent with the Hartman effect and attosecond measurements. All results derive solely from the Trinity constants {π, φ, e} with zero adjustable parameters. The paper resolves the tunneling mystery by identifying tunneling as a finite, domain-limited physical process rather than a purely mathematical artifact. This work constitutes Paper IV in a planned sequence addressing foundational inconsistencies in quantum field theory, following finite resolutions of measurement, wave–particle duality, and entanglement. Licenses Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 Internationa

•Jan 17, 2026•0 citations

On the Superluminal Quantum Tunneling and "Causality Violation"

Moses Fayngold

This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a signal, are discussed. The argument is presented that claim of superluminal signaling allegedly observed in frustrated internal reflection experiment was based on the wrong interpretation of the tunneling process. A thought experiment similar to that in the Tolman paradox is discussed. It shows that a new factor, attenuation, comes in the interplay between tunneled signals and macroscopic causality.

arXiv:1412.7200•Dec 22, 2014•2 citations

Superluminality and optical tunnelling

Ole Keller, Jacob Broe

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

"Superluminal" tunnelling, quantum measurements and the speed of information transfer

D. Sokolovski, ALFRED Z. MSEZANE, Vasily R. Shaginyan

We exploit the analogy between tunnelling across a potential barrier and Aharonov's weak measurements to resolve the long standing paradox between the impossibility to exceed the speed of light and the seemingly 'superluminal' behaviur of the tunnelling particle in the barrier. We demonstrate that 'superluminality' occurs when the value of the duration $τ$ spent in the barrier is uncertain, whereas when $τ$ is known accurately, no 'superluminal' behaviur is observed. In all cases only subluminal durations contribute to the transmission, which precludes faster-than-light information transfer, as shown by a recent experiment.

arXiv:quant-ph/0401159•Jan 26, 2004•0 citations
This paper presents a finite, physical resolution of quantum tunneling within the Dual Regulator Framework, interpreting barrier penetration as a temporary excursion into the virtual domain rather than a paradoxical traversal of classically forbidden space. In this framework, particles encountering a potential barrier transition from the real domain (on-shell, position space, RG-regulated) into a virtual domain (off-shell, momentum space, Λφ-regulated), where position-space potentials are undefined. After traversing the barrier off-shell, particles re-emerge into the real domain on the opposite side. Energy conservation is preserved through finite energy–time uncertainty, without invoking nonphysical violations. The formalism yields a modified tunneling length scale and probability law, introducing a universal Λφ correction to standard WKB results. This leads to quantitative, testable predictions across multiple systems, including: alpha decay half-lives with sub-percent accuracy across the periodic table, scanning tunneling microscope current–distance relations with φ-harmonic structure, ammonia inversion frequency corrected by a (1 + Λφ/π) factor matching experiment, tunneling time saturation consistent with the Hartman effect and attosecond measurements. All results derive solely from the Trinity constants {π, φ, e} with zero adjustable parameters. The paper resolves the tunneling mystery by identifying tunneling as a finite, domain-limited physical process rather than a purely mathematical artifact. This work constitutes Paper IV in a planned sequence addressing foundational inconsistencies in quantum field theory, following finite resolutions of measurement, wave–particle duality, and entanglement. Licenses Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 Internationa
This is an analysis of some aspects of an old but still controversial topic, superluminal quantum tunneling. Some features of quantum tunneling described in literature, such as definition of the tunneling time and a frequency range of a signal, are discussed. The argument is presented that claim of superluminal signaling allegedly observed in frustrated internal reflection experiment was based on the wrong interpretation of the tunneling process. A thought experiment similar to that in the Tolman paradox is discussed. It shows that a new factor, attenuation, comes in the interplay between tunneled signals and macroscopic causality.
We exploit the analogy between tunnelling across a potential barrier and Aharonov's weak measurements to resolve the long standing paradox between the impossibility to exceed the speed of light and the seemingly 'superluminal' behaviur of the tunnelling particle in the barrier. We demonstrate that 'superluminality' occurs when the value of the duration τττ spent in the barrier is uncertain, whereas when τττ is known accurately, no 'superluminal' behaviur is observed. In all cases only subluminal durations contribute to the transmission, which precludes faster-than-light information transfer, as shown by a recent experiment.