Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

The Quantum Physicists

William H. Cropper, Thomas Von Foerster

Published Feb 1, 1971• 16 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.3022566

Related papers

Quantum Science

Jean‐Louis Calais, Osvaldo Goscinski, Jan Linderberg +1 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1976•22 citations

Surveying the Attitudes of Physicists Concerning Foundational Issues of Quantum Mechanics

Sujeevan Sivasundaram, Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen

Even though quantum mechanics has existed for almost 100 years, questions concerning the foundation and interpretation of the theory still remain. These issues have gathered more attention in recent years, but does this mean that physicists are more aware of foundational issues concerning quantum mechanics? A survey was sent out to 1234 physicists affiliated to 8 different universities. 149 responded to the questions, which both concerned foundational issues related to quantum mechanics, specifically, as well as questions concerning interpretations of physical theories in general. The answers to the survey revealed that foundational concepts in quantum mechanics are still a topic that only a minority of physicists are familiar with, although a clear majority of physicists find that interpretations of physical theories are important. The various questions, as well as how the respondents answered, are presented. The survey intends to give an overview of what the opinion of the physics community, in general, is concerning issues related to quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1612.00676•Dec 2, 2016•9 citations

The quantum theory

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Quantum Harmonic Analysis of the Density Matrix

Maurice A. de Gosson

We will study rigorously the notion of mixed states and their density matrices. We will also discuss the quantum-mechanical consequences of possible variations of Planck's constant h. This review has been written having in mind two readerships: mathematical physicists and quantum physicists. The mathematical rigor is maximal, but the language and notation we use throughout should be familiar to physicists. Quanta 2018; 7: 74–110.

arXiv:1703.00889•Quanta•Sep 26, 2018•30 citations

Quantum Science

Taku Onishi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation

Introducing categories to the practicing physicist

Bob Coecke

We argue that category theory should become a part of the daily practice of the physicist, and more specific, the quantum physicist and/or informatician. The reason for this is not that category theory is a better way of doing mathematics, but that monoidal categories constitute the actual algebra of practicing physics. We will not provide rigorous definitions or anything resembling a coherent mathematical theory, but we will take the reader for a journey introducing concepts which are part of category theory in a manner that the physicist will recognize them.

arXiv:0808.1032•Aug 7, 2008•48 citations
Even though quantum mechanics has existed for almost 100 years, questions concerning the foundation and interpretation of the theory still remain. These issues have gathered more attention in recent years, but does this mean that physicists are more aware of foundational issues concerning quantum mechanics? A survey was sent out to 1234 physicists affiliated to 8 different universities. 149 responded to the questions, which both concerned foundational issues related to quantum mechanics, specifically, as well as questions concerning interpretations of physical theories in general. The answers to the survey revealed that foundational concepts in quantum mechanics are still a topic that only a minority of physicists are familiar with, although a clear majority of physicists find that interpretations of physical theories are important. The various questions, as well as how the respondents answered, are presented. The survey intends to give an overview of what the opinion of the physics community, in general, is concerning issues related to quantum mechanics.
We argue that category theory should become a part of the daily practice of the physicist, and more specific, the quantum physicist and/or informatician. The reason for this is not that category theory is a better way of doing mathematics, but that monoidal categories constitute the actual algebra of practicing physics. We will not provide rigorous definitions or anything resembling a coherent mathematical theory, but we will take the reader for a journey introducing concepts which are part of category theory in a manner that the physicist will recognize them.