Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics

Experimental demonstration of the relative phase operator

Alexei S. Trifonov, Tedros Tsegaye, Gunnar G. Bjork, Jonas Söderholm, E. Goobar, Mete Atatüre, Alexander V. Sergienko

Published Apr 1, 2000• 32 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We have experimentally demonstrated a realization of the two-mode relative phase operator introduced by Luis and Sánchez-Soto (Luis A and Sánchez-Soto L L 1993 Phys. Rev. A 48 4702). The relative phase distribution function was measured for a weakly excited relative phase eigenstate and weakly excited two-mode coherent states. The experiment is also (using the eigenstates) a demonstration of Heisenberg-limited interferometry.

DOI
10.1088/1464-4266/2/2/307

Related papers

Phase-difference measurements, distributions and the phase-difference minimum uncertainty states

Gunnar G. Bjork, Jonas Söderholm

We discuss phase-difference measurements of two bosonic modes and propose an experimental realization of the phase-difference operator by Luis and S?nchez-Soto (1993 Phys. Rev. A 48 4702). We show that a measurement of a two-mode state will collapse any state into a phase-difference eigenstate. We also show that the phase-difference number-difference commutator can be expressed in the phase-difference distribution. Finally, we discuss the associated minimum uncertainty states.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Jan 1, 1999•13 citations

Quantized Phase-Difference

Jonas Söderholm, Alexei S. Trifonov, Tedros Tsegaye +1 more

From the experimentalist’ spoint of view, it is natural to think of aphase measurement as a measurement that involves a reference time. As a part of the system, the reference time generating “clock” must be taken into account in the quantum treatment of the measuring process. This could be argued to be the reason why there does not exist any observable corresponding to the absolute phase in the unrestricted Hilbert space.Luis and Sánchez-Soto [Phys. Rev. A 48, 4702 (1993)] have investigated the case where the “clock” is another harmonic oscillator and defined a Hermitian phase-difference operator, which is valid in the infinite Hilbert space.In the present work we propose and experimentally demonstrate a setup for direct measurement of the phase-difference. We derive the phase-difference distributions for some two-mode states and compare them with the experimental results.

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks•Dec 19, 2005•0 citations

Relative Phase States in Quantum-Atom Optics

Bryan J. Dalton

Relative phase is treated as a physical quantity for two mode systems in quantum atom optics, adapting the Pegg-Barnett treatment of quantum optical phase to define a linear Hermitian relative phase operator via first introducing a complete orthonormal set of relative phase eigenstates. These states are contrasted with other so-called phase states. Other approaches to treating phase and previous attempts to find a Hermitian phase operator are discussed. The relative phase eigenstate has maximal two mode entanglement, it is a fragmented state with its Bloch vector lying inside the Bloch sphere and is highly spin squeezed. The relative phase states are applied to describing interferometry experiments with Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC), particularly in the context of a proposed Heisenberg limited interferometry experiment. For a relative phase eigenstate the fractional fluctuation in one spin operator component perpendicular to the Bloch vector is essentially only of order 1/N, so if such a highly spin squeezed state could be prepared it may be useful for Heisenberg limited interferometry. An approach for preparing a BEC in a state close to a relative phase state is suggested, based on adiabatically changing parameters in the Josephson Hamiltonian starting from a suitable energy eigenstate in the Rabi regime.

arXiv:1108.0756•Aug 3, 2011•0 citations

On the Quantum Phase Operator for Coherent States

Bo-Sture Skagerstam, Bjørn Å Bergsjordet

In papers by Lynch [ Phys. Rev. A 41 2841 (1990)] and Gerry and Urbanski [ Phys. Rev. A 42 662 (1990)] it has been argued that the phase-fluctuation laser experiments of Gerhardt, Büchler and Lifkin [ Phys. Lett. 49A 119 (1974)] are in good agreement with the variance of the Pegg–Barnett phase operator for a coherent state, even for a small number of photons. We argue that this is not conclusive. In fact, we show that the variance of the phase in fact depends on the relative phase between the phase of the coherent state and the off-set phase ϕ 0 of the Pegg–Barnett phase operator. This off-set phase is replaced with the phase of a reference beam in an actual experiment and we show that several choices of such a relative phase can be fitted to the experimental data. We also discuss the Noh, Fougères and Mandel [ Phys. Rev. A 46 2840 (1992)] relative phase experiment in terms of the Pegg–Barnett phase taking post-selection conditions into account.

arXiv:quant-ph/0307156•Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 2004•7 citations

Entangled Coherent States, Heisenberg-Limited Interferometry, and Related Issues

Christopher C. Gerry, Adil Benmoussa

We discuss the generation of two mode maximally entangled coherent states using a weak nonlinear medium. We then discuss their applications to quantum metrology (Heisenberg-limited interferometry), quantum lithography, and violations of Bell-type inequalities.

International Conference on Quantum Information•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

Visibility is not a good measure of a well-defined relative phase

Gunnar G. Bjork, Shuichiro Inoue, Jonas Söderholm

In a recent paper Marburger and Das [J. H. Marburger III and K. K. Das, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2213 (1999)] considered an interference visibility experiment involving two weakly interacting Bose-Einstein condensates. It was shown that condensate eigenstates of the Hermitian relative phase operator do not give interference fringes with unit visibility in a Young's double slit type of experiment. The authors concluded that ``\dots{} these states are not especially well suited to describe weakly interacting multiply occupied coherent bosonic systems.'' In this work we suggest a criterion for states with a well-defined relative phase. Subsequently we show that the relative phase operator eigenstates satisfy this criterion. This suggests that the concept of interference visibility can, and should, be generalized, since it is widely believed that interference visibility is a measure of the relative phase properties. We therefore propose a broader, but still operational, definition of interference visibility, which we call generalized visibility, and prove that the relative phase operator eigenstates indeed can show unit generalized visibility. We also derive a simple, but general, criterion for states which can display a unit generalized visibility. Somewhat surprisingly, this criterion is weaker than the criterion for a well-defined relative phase. Finally, we discuss which two-mode states can display unit (ordinary) visibility.

Physical Review A•Jul 20, 2000•10 citations
We have experimentally demonstrated a realization of the two-mode relative phase operator introduced by Luis and Sánchez-Soto (Luis A and Sánchez-Soto L L 1993 Phys. Rev. A 48 4702). The relative phase distribution function was measured for a weakly excited relative phase eigenstate and weakly excited two-mode coherent states. The experiment is also (using the eigenstates) a demonstration of Heisenberg-limited interferometry.
From the experimentalist’ spoint of view, it is natural to think of aphase measurement as a measurement that involves a reference time. As a part of the system, the reference time generating “clock” must be taken into account in the quantum treatment of the measuring process. This could be argued to be the reason why there does not exist any observable corresponding to the absolute phase in the unrestricted Hilbert space.Luis and Sánchez-Soto [Phys. Rev. A 48, 4702 (1993)] have investigated the case where the “clock” is another harmonic oscillator and defined a Hermitian phase-difference operator, which is valid in the infinite Hilbert space.In the present work we propose and experimentally demonstrate a setup for direct measurement of the phase-difference. We derive the phase-difference distributions for some two-mode states and compare them with the experimental results.
Relative phase is treated as a physical quantity for two mode systems in quantum atom optics, adapting the Pegg-Barnett treatment of quantum optical phase to define a linear Hermitian relative phase operator via first introducing a complete orthonormal set of relative phase eigenstates. These states are contrasted with other so-called phase states. Other approaches to treating phase and previous attempts to find a Hermitian phase operator are discussed. The relative phase eigenstate has maximal two mode entanglement, it is a fragmented state with its Bloch vector lying inside the Bloch sphere and is highly spin squeezed. The relative phase states are applied to describing interferometry experiments with Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC), particularly in the context of a proposed Heisenberg limited interferometry experiment. For a relative phase eigenstate the fractional fluctuation in one spin operator component perpendicular to the Bloch vector is essentially only of order 1/N, so if such a highly spin squeezed state could be prepared it may be useful for Heisenberg limited interferometry. An approach for preparing a BEC in a state close to a relative phase state is suggested, based on adiabatically changing parameters in the Josephson Hamiltonian starting from a suitable energy eigenstate in the Rabi regime.
In papers by Lynch [ Phys. Rev. A 41 2841 (1990)] and Gerry and Urbanski [ Phys. Rev. A 42 662 (1990)] it has been argued that the phase-fluctuation laser experiments of Gerhardt, Büchler and Lifkin [ Phys. Lett. 49A 119 (1974)] are in good agreement with the variance of the Pegg–Barnett phase operator for a coherent state, even for a small number of photons. We argue that this is not conclusive. In fact, we show that the variance of the phase in fact depends on the relative phase between the phase of the coherent state and the off-set phase ϕ 0 of the Pegg–Barnett phase operator. This off-set phase is replaced with the phase of a reference beam in an actual experiment and we show that several choices of such a relative phase can be fitted to the experimental data. We also discuss the Noh, Fougères and Mandel [ Phys. Rev. A 46 2840 (1992)] relative phase experiment in terms of the Pegg–Barnett phase taking post-selection conditions into account.
In a recent paper Marburger and Das [J. H. Marburger III and K. K. Das, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2213 (1999)] considered an interference visibility experiment involving two weakly interacting Bose-Einstein condensates. It was shown that condensate eigenstates of the Hermitian relative phase operator do not give interference fringes with unit visibility in a Young's double slit type of experiment. The authors concluded that ``\dots{} these states are not especially well suited to describe weakly interacting multiply occupied coherent bosonic systems.'' In this work we suggest a criterion for states with a well-defined relative phase. Subsequently we show that the relative phase operator eigenstates satisfy this criterion. This suggests that the concept of interference visibility can, and should, be generalized, since it is widely believed that interference visibility is a measure of the relative phase properties. We therefore propose a broader, but still operational, definition of interference visibility, which we call generalized visibility, and prove that the relative phase operator eigenstates indeed can show unit generalized visibility. We also derive a simple, but general, criterion for states which can display a unit generalized visibility. Somewhat surprisingly, this criterion is weaker than the criterion for a well-defined relative phase. Finally, we discuss which two-mode states can display unit (ordinary) visibility.