Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AIP conference proceedings

The quantum Zeno effect in trapped ions

Richard Claude Thompson, José Luis Hernández‐Pozos, J. T. Höffges, D. M. Segal, J R Vincent

Published Jan 1, 1999• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The quantum Zeno effect is the slowing down of the rate of a quantum mechanical transition by the frequent application of measurements to the system. Following the original suggestion of an experiment to test this in trapped ions, Itano et al. performed an experiment in 1990. This was followed by several detailed theoretical treatments of the problem, making new predictions and giving a better understanding of what was happening. Also since then, suggestions for new types of experiment to test the quantum Zeno effect have been made. At Imperial College we are currently setting up an experiment to study the quantum Zeno effect on a single ion, incorporating some of these new ideas. Details of this experiment are discussed in the paper.

DOI
10.1063/1.57449

Related papers

The Quantum Zeno Paradox, 42 Years On

Wayne M. Itano

The term 'quantum Zeno paradox' or 'quantum Zeno effect' refers to the slowing down of the evolution of a quantum system as it is observed more and more frequently.In 1977, Misra and Sudarshan gave a theoretical demonstration of its existence.There has been disagreement regarding the definition of the effect and whether it is really a paradox, requiring new physics, or a consequence of ordinary quantum mechanics.The experiment of Itano, Heinzen, Bollinger and Wineland, published in 1990, is the one most often called a demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect.Some different interpretations are discussed.

Current Science•Jan 25, 2019•7 citations

Quantum Zeno effect and quantum Zeno paradox in atomic physics

Ellen Block, P. R. Berman

Itano and co-workers [Wayne M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)] have recently reported the experimental verification of the quantum Zeno effect, which is the inhibition of a quantum transition by frequent measurements. In this article, we offer an alternative interpretation of the quantum Zeno effect. We show that an analysis of the dynamics of the full three-level system gives the same result. There is no need to assume explicitly that the wave function has collapsed, nor even to assume that an ideal measurement has been made. In addition, we differentiate between what has been referred to as the quantum Zeno effect and what has been termed the quantum Zeno paradox. The former is the inhibition of induced transitions, and the latter is the, as yet experimentally unobserved, inhibition of spontaneous decay. Our interpretation, which emphasizes the ``measurement''-induced interruption of atomic-state coherences as the cause of inhibited quantum transitions, suggests a resolution to the quantum Zeno paradox. The theoretical limit of continuous observation is discussed.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1991•72 citations

Understanding the quantum Zeno effect

Hiromichi Nakazato, Mikio Namiki, Saverio Pascazio +1 more

The quantum Zeno effect consists in the hindrance of the evolution of a quantum system that is very frequently monitored and found to be in its initial state at every single measurement. On the basis of the correct formula for the survival probability, i.e. the probability of finding the system in its initial state at every single measurement, we critically analyze a recent proposal and experimental test, that make use of an oscillating system. PACS: 03.65.Bz, 42.50.-p 1 The seminal formulation of the quantum Zeno effect, due to Misra and Sudarshan [1], deals with the probability of observing an unstable system in its initial state throughout a time interval ∆ = [0, t]. The purpose of this note is to point out that the quantum Zeno effect has not been experimentally observed, yet, in its original formulation. Indeed, we shall argue that the interesting proposal by Cook [2], that makes use of a two-level system undergoing Rabi oscillations, as well as the beautiful experiment performed by Itano et al. [3], investigate the probability of finding the

•Jan 1, 1996•36 citations

Perspectives on the quantum Zeno paradox

Wayne M. Itano

As of October 2006, there were approximately 535 citations to the seminal 1977 paper of Misra and Sudarshan that pointed out the quantum Zeno paradox (more often called the quantum Zeno effect). In simple terms, the quantum Zeno effect refers to a slowing down of the evolution of a quantum state in the limit that the state is observed continuously. There has been much disagreement as to how the quantum Zeno effect should be defined and as to whether it is really a paradox, requiring new physics, or merely a consequence of "ordinary" quantum mechanics. The experiment of Itano, Heinzen, Bollinger, and Wineland, published in 1990, has been cited around 347 times and seems to be the one most often called a demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect. Given that there is disagreement as to what the quantum Zeno effect is , there naturally is disagreement as to whether that experiment demonstrated the quantum Zeno effect. Some differing perspectives regarding the quantum Zeno effect and what would constitute an experimental demonstration are discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0612187•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Nov 1, 2009•30 citations

Quantum Zeno Effect and Light-Dark Periods for a Single Atom

Almut Beige, Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt

The quantum Zeno effect (QZE) predicts a slow-down of the time development of a system under rapidly repeated ideal measurements, and experimentally this was tested for an ensemble of atoms using short laser pulses for non-selective state measurements. Here we consider such pulses for selective measurements on a single system. Each probe pulse will cause a burst of fluorescence or no fluorescence. If the probe pulses were strictly ideal measurements, the QZE would predict periods of fluorescence bursts alternating with periods of no fluorescence (light and dark periods) which would become longer and longer with increasing frequency of the measurements. The non-ideal character of the measurements is taken into account by incorporating the laser pulses in the interaction, and this is used to determine the corrections to the ideal case. In the limit, when the time between the laser pulses goes to zero, no freezing occurs but instead we show convergence to the familiar macroscopic light and dark periods of the continuously driven Dehmelt system. An experiment of this type should be feasible for a single atom or ion in a trap

•Jan 1, 1996•12 citations

Demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect with laser-cooled ions

Wayne M. Itano, Daniel J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger +1 more

Laser-cooled ions stored in Penning traps are essentially free from collisions and other perturbations that could cause relaxations. This, and the fact that their energy levels can easily be manipulated with rf and laser radiation, makes them well suited for demonstrating certain aspects of quantum measurement theory. The quantum Zeno effect is the inhibition of transitions between states by frequent measurements.1 We have observed this effect in a 9Be+ ground-state rf transition. The measurements are short pulses of light. If the ion is in one state, it scatters a few photons; if it is in the other, it scatters no photons. In the latter case the wavefunction collapse is due to a null measurement.2 The dynamics of this system are similar to those which are predicted to lead to nonexponential spontaneous decay at short times.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations
The quantum Zeno effect is the slowing down of the rate of a quantum mechanical transition by the frequent application of measurements to the system. Following the original suggestion of an experiment to test this in trapped ions, Itano et al. performed an experiment in 1990. This was followed by several detailed theoretical treatments of the problem, making new predictions and giving a better understanding of what was happening. Also since then, suggestions for new types of experiment to test the quantum Zeno effect have been made. At Imperial College we are currently setting up an experiment to study the quantum Zeno effect on a single ion, incorporating some of these new ideas. Details of this experiment are discussed in the paper.
The term 'quantum Zeno paradox' or 'quantum Zeno effect' refers to the slowing down of the evolution of a quantum system as it is observed more and more frequently.In 1977, Misra and Sudarshan gave a theoretical demonstration of its existence.There has been disagreement regarding the definition of the effect and whether it is really a paradox, requiring new physics, or a consequence of ordinary quantum mechanics.The experiment of Itano, Heinzen, Bollinger and Wineland, published in 1990, is the one most often called a demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect.Some different interpretations are discussed.
Itano and co-workers [Wayne M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2295 (1990)] have recently reported the experimental verification of the quantum Zeno effect, which is the inhibition of a quantum transition by frequent measurements. In this article, we offer an alternative interpretation of the quantum Zeno effect. We show that an analysis of the dynamics of the full three-level system gives the same result. There is no need to assume explicitly that the wave function has collapsed, nor even to assume that an ideal measurement has been made. In addition, we differentiate between what has been referred to as the quantum Zeno effect and what has been termed the quantum Zeno paradox. The former is the inhibition of induced transitions, and the latter is the, as yet experimentally unobserved, inhibition of spontaneous decay. Our interpretation, which emphasizes the ``measurement''-induced interruption of atomic-state coherences as the cause of inhibited quantum transitions, suggests a resolution to the quantum Zeno paradox. The theoretical limit of continuous observation is discussed.
The quantum Zeno effect consists in the hindrance of the evolution of a quantum system that is very frequently monitored and found to be in its initial state at every single measurement. On the basis of the correct formula for the survival probability, i.e. the probability of finding the system in its initial state at every single measurement, we critically analyze a recent proposal and experimental test, that make use of an oscillating system. PACS: 03.65.Bz, 42.50.-p 1 The seminal formulation of the quantum Zeno effect, due to Misra and Sudarshan [1], deals with the probability of observing an unstable system in its initial state throughout a time interval ∆ = [0, t]. The purpose of this note is to point out that the quantum Zeno effect has not been experimentally observed, yet, in its original formulation. Indeed, we shall argue that the interesting proposal by Cook [2], that makes use of a two-level system undergoing Rabi oscillations, as well as the beautiful experiment performed by Itano et al. [3], investigate the probability of finding the
As of October 2006, there were approximately 535 citations to the seminal 1977 paper of Misra and Sudarshan that pointed out the quantum Zeno paradox (more often called the quantum Zeno effect). In simple terms, the quantum Zeno effect refers to a slowing down of the evolution of a quantum state in the limit that the state is observed continuously. There has been much disagreement as to how the quantum Zeno effect should be defined and as to whether it is really a paradox, requiring new physics, or merely a consequence of "ordinary" quantum mechanics. The experiment of Itano, Heinzen, Bollinger, and Wineland, published in 1990, has been cited around 347 times and seems to be the one most often called a demonstration of the quantum Zeno effect. Given that there is disagreement as to what the quantum Zeno effect is , there naturally is disagreement as to whether that experiment demonstrated the quantum Zeno effect. Some differing perspectives regarding the quantum Zeno effect and what would constitute an experimental demonstration are discussed.
The quantum Zeno effect (QZE) predicts a slow-down of the time development of a system under rapidly repeated ideal measurements, and experimentally this was tested for an ensemble of atoms using short laser pulses for non-selective state measurements. Here we consider such pulses for selective measurements on a single system. Each probe pulse will cause a burst of fluorescence or no fluorescence. If the probe pulses were strictly ideal measurements, the QZE would predict periods of fluorescence bursts alternating with periods of no fluorescence (light and dark periods) which would become longer and longer with increasing frequency of the measurements. The non-ideal character of the measurements is taken into account by incorporating the laser pulses in the interaction, and this is used to determine the corrections to the ideal case. In the limit, when the time between the laser pulses goes to zero, no freezing occurs but instead we show convergence to the familiar macroscopic light and dark periods of the continuously driven Dehmelt system. An experiment of this type should be feasible for a single atom or ion in a trap
Laser-cooled ions stored in Penning traps are essentially free from collisions and other perturbations that could cause relaxations. This, and the fact that their energy levels can easily be manipulated with rf and laser radiation, makes them well suited for demonstrating certain aspects of quantum measurement theory. The quantum Zeno effect is the inhibition of transitions between states by frequent measurements.1 We have observed this effect in a 9Be+ ground-state rf transition. The measurements are short pulses of light. If the ion is in one state, it scatters a few photons; if it is in the other, it scatters no photons. In the latter case the wavefunction collapse is due to a null measurement.2 The dynamics of this system are similar to those which are predicted to lead to nonexponential spontaneous decay at short times.