Nuclear γ-ray superradiance

Abstract

Nuclear γ-ray-resonant superradiance is discussed, comparing Dicke's original approach 1 Dicke, RH. 1954. Phys. Rev., 93: 99–110. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] and recent extensions 2 Scully, MO, Fry, ES, Ooi, CHR and Wódkiewicz, K. 2006. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96: 010501[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar],3 Scully, MO. 2007. Laser Phys., 17: 635–646. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] of Scully et al. 2–5 Scully, MO, Fry, ES, Ooi, CHR and Wódkiewicz, K. 2006. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96: 010501 Scully, MO. 2007. Laser Phys., 17: 635–646. Svidzinsky, A and Chang, J-T. 2008. Phys. Rev. A, 77: 043833 Svidzinsky, AA, Chang, J-T and Scully, MO. 2008. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100: 160504 involving conditional excitation to the classical resonant-scattering 6–10 Lynch, FJ, Holland, RE and Hamermesh, M. 1960. Phys. Rev., 120: 513–520. Kagan, Y and Afanas'ev, AM. 1973. Z. Naturforsch Pt. A, 28: 1351–1360. Kagan, Y, Afanas'ev, AM and Kohn, VG. 1979. J. Phys. C, 12: 615–631. Kagan, Y. 1999. Hyperfine Interact., 123–124: 83–126. Smirnov, GV. 1999. Hyperfine Interact., 123–124: 31–77. and the Hannon–Trammell 11–14 Trammell, GT. 1962. Phys. Rev., 126: 1045–1054. Hannon, JP and Trammell, GT. 1968. Phys. Rev., 169: 315–329. Hannon, JP and Trammell, GT. 1969. Phys. Rev., 186: 306–325. Hannon, JP and Trammell, GT. 1999. Hyperfine Interact., 123–124: 127–274. quantum theories. Relevant questions are whether the sample is optically thin or thick in the excitation and re-radiation processes, the role of superpositions between ground and excited states, Fermi's golden rule, and decoherence due to spatially-dependent near-field interactions 15–17 Friedberg, R and Hartmann, SR. 1974. Phys. Rev. A, 10: 1728–1739. Friedberg, R, Hartmann, SR and Manassah, JT. 1972. Phys. Lett. A, 40: 365–366. Friedberg, R and Manassah, JT. 2008. Phys. Lett. A, 372: 2514–2521. . The relation of these considerations to experimental results is discussed.