Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature Physics

Why quantum chemistry is hard

Scott Aaronson

Published Oct 1, 2009• 18 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/nphys1415

Related papers

Quantum chemistry made easier

Anonymous

Physics•Dec 22, 2008•0 citations

Quantum computing library for quantum chemistry applications

Konstantin M. Makushin, Mariia D. Sapova, Aleksey K. Fedorov

Abstract Quantum computing is aimed to solve tasks, which are believed to be exponentially hard to existing computational devices and tools. A prominent example of such classically hard problems is simulating complex quantum many-body systems, in particular, for quantum chemistry. However, solving realistic quantum chemistry problems with quantum computers encounters various difficulties, which are related, first, to limited computational capabilities of existing quantum devices and, second, to the efficiency of algorithmic approaches. In the present work, we address the algorithmic side of quantum chemistry applications by introducing a Python 3 code library, whose primary objective is to speed up the development of variational quantum algorithms for electronic structure problems. We describe the various features and capabilities of this library, including its ease in constructing customized versions of variational quantum algorithms. We elucidate how the developed library allows one to design quantum circuits and enable for the efficient execution of quantum algorithms. Furthermore, the library facilitates the integration of classical and quantum algorithms for hybrid computations and helps to realize the cross-verification of data with traditional computational methods, thereby enhancing the overall reliability of quantum chemistry simulations.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Feb 1, 2024•5 citations

Improved Hardness Results for the Guided Local Hamiltonian Problem

Chris Cade, Marten Folkertsma, Sevag Gharibian +4 more

Estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian is a central problem in quantum chemistry. In order to further investigate its complexity and the potential of quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, Gharibian and Le Gall (STOC 2022) recently introduced the guided local Hamiltonian problem (GLH), which is a variant of the local Hamiltonian problem where an approximation of a ground state (which is called a guiding state) is given as an additional input. Gharibian and Le Gall showed quantum advantage (more precisely, BQP-completeness) for GLH with $6$-local Hamiltonians when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to $1/2$ with a ground state. In this paper, we optimally improve both the locality and the fidelity parameter: we show that the BQP-completeness persists even with 2-local Hamiltonians, and even when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1 with a ground state. Moreover, we show that the BQP-completeness also holds for 2-local physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice or a 2D triangular lattice. Beyond the hardness of estimating the ground state energy, we also show BQP-hardness persists when considering estimating energies of excited states of these Hamiltonians instead. Those make further steps towards establishing practical quantum advantage in quantum chemistry.

arXiv:2207.10250•Jul 21, 2022•2 citations

New Challenges in Quantum Chemistry

Vera Köester

ChemViews•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Nature of quantum chemistry

Per‐Olov Löwdin

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 1967•9 citations

Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing

Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P. Olson +10 more

Practical challenges in simulating quantum systems on classical computers have been widely recognized in the quantum physics and quantum chemistry communities over the past century. Although many approximation methods have been introduced, the complexity of quantum mechanics remains hard to appease. The advent of quantum computation brings new pathways to navigate this challenging and complex landscape. By manipulating quantum states of matter and taking advantage of their unique features such as superposition and entanglement, quantum computers promise to efficiently deliver accurate results for many important problems in quantum chemistry, such as the electronic structure of molecules. In the past two decades, significant advances have been made in developing algorithms and physical hardware for quantum computing, heralding a revolution in simulation of quantum systems. This Review provides an overview of the algorithms and results that are relevant for quantum chemistry. The intended audience is both quantum chemists who seek to learn more about quantum computing and quantum computing researchers who would like to explore applications in quantum chemistry.

arXiv:1812.09976•Chemical Reviews•Aug 30, 2019•1,560 citations
Abstract Quantum computing is aimed to solve tasks, which are believed to be exponentially hard to existing computational devices and tools. A prominent example of such classically hard problems is simulating complex quantum many-body systems, in particular, for quantum chemistry. However, solving realistic quantum chemistry problems with quantum computers encounters various difficulties, which are related, first, to limited computational capabilities of existing quantum devices and, second, to the efficiency of algorithmic approaches. In the present work, we address the algorithmic side of quantum chemistry applications by introducing a Python 3 code library, whose primary objective is to speed up the development of variational quantum algorithms for electronic structure problems. We describe the various features and capabilities of this library, including its ease in constructing customized versions of variational quantum algorithms. We elucidate how the developed library allows one to design quantum circuits and enable for the efficient execution of quantum algorithms. Furthermore, the library facilitates the integration of classical and quantum algorithms for hybrid computations and helps to realize the cross-verification of data with traditional computational methods, thereby enhancing the overall reliability of quantum chemistry simulations.
Estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian is a central problem in quantum chemistry. In order to further investigate its complexity and the potential of quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, Gharibian and Le Gall (STOC 2022) recently introduced the guided local Hamiltonian problem (GLH), which is a variant of the local Hamiltonian problem where an approximation of a ground state (which is called a guiding state) is given as an additional input. Gharibian and Le Gall showed quantum advantage (more precisely, BQP-completeness) for GLH with 666-local Hamiltonians when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1/21/21/2 with a ground state. In this paper, we optimally improve both the locality and the fidelity parameter: we show that the BQP-completeness persists even with 2-local Hamiltonians, and even when the guiding state has fidelity (inverse-polynomially) close to 1 with a ground state. Moreover, we show that the BQP-completeness also holds for 2-local physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice or a 2D triangular lattice. Beyond the hardness of estimating the ground state energy, we also show BQP-hardness persists when considering estimating energies of excited states of these Hamiltonians instead. Those make further steps towards establishing practical quantum advantage in quantum chemistry.
Practical challenges in simulating quantum systems on classical computers have been widely recognized in the quantum physics and quantum chemistry communities over the past century. Although many approximation methods have been introduced, the complexity of quantum mechanics remains hard to appease. The advent of quantum computation brings new pathways to navigate this challenging and complex landscape. By manipulating quantum states of matter and taking advantage of their unique features such as superposition and entanglement, quantum computers promise to efficiently deliver accurate results for many important problems in quantum chemistry, such as the electronic structure of molecules. In the past two decades, significant advances have been made in developing algorithms and physical hardware for quantum computing, heralding a revolution in simulation of quantum systems. This Review provides an overview of the algorithms and results that are relevant for quantum chemistry. The intended audience is both quantum chemists who seek to learn more about quantum computing and quantum computing researchers who would like to explore applications in quantum chemistry.