Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Test of the screening approximation (n-1 expansion) for the one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau field

Richard A. Ferrell, Douglas J. Scalapino

Published Feb 1, 1974• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(74)90962-1

Related papers

Nonlinear critical slowing down of the one-component Ginzburg-Landau field

Richard Bausch, Erich Eisenriegler, H. K. Janssen

The European Physical Journal B•Jun 1, 1979•20 citations

Covariant gaussian approximation in Ginzburg–Landau model

J.F. Wang, Dingping Li, Hsien-Chung Kao +1 more

arXiv:1612.09053•Annals of Physics•Mar 30, 2017•15 citations

The Ginzburg - Landau expansion for states with correlated cooper pairs

Vladimir R. Chechetkin, Aleksandr Sergeevich Sigov

Solid State Communications•Dec 1, 1982•0 citations

Statistical mechanics of zero-dimensional ginzburglandau fields: Accuracy of the screening approximation

Alan J. Bray

Journal of Statistical Physics•Jul 1, 1974•14 citations

Statistical mechanics of one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau fields. II. A test of the screening approximation n−1 expansion)

Richard A. Ferrell, Douglas J. Scalapino

The free-energy density of a one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau field with $n$ components ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{3}$ is identified with the quantum-mechanical ground-state energy of an $n$-dimensional anharmonic oscillator. Normalizing the anharmonic term by ${(4n)}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and expanding in powers of ${n}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, we find for the ground-state energy, $n{E}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}+{E}^{(1)}+{n}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{E}^{(2)}$, where ${E}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}=\frac{\ensuremath{\kappa}}{2}\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{16{\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{2}}$, and ${E}^{(1)}=\frac{({\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}\ensuremath{-}2\ensuremath{\kappa})}{2}$ and ${E}^{(2)}=3{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}^{\ensuremath{-}2}\ensuremath{-}6\ensuremath{\kappa}{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\ensuremath{-}(\frac{11}{4}){\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$ are the Hartree and first and second screening approximations, respectively. $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ and ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}={(4{\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{2}+{\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{\ensuremath{-}1})}^{\frac{1}{2}}$ are the inverse correlation lengths for ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{i}$ and $\ensuremath{\Sigma}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{i}^{2}$ respectively. The temperature is linearly related to the spring constant $\ensuremath{\tau}$, which in turn is connected with the correlation lengths by $\ensuremath{\tau}={\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{2}\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2\ensuremath{\kappa}}$. The analytic results are compared with exact numerical computations for $n=1, 2, 3, \mathrm{and} 4$. The second screening correction modestly improves the accuracy of the approximation.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1974•47 citations

Statistical mechanics of one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau fields: Feynman graph evaluation of the screening approximation (n-1expansion)

Alan J. Bray

The free energy per component of an isotropic one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau field with n components is calculated to order n -2 by evaluating the appropriate Feynman graphs. The result agrees with that of Ferrell and Scalapino (1974) obtained by solving the equivalent anharmonic oscillator problem, but the method has greater generality.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical Nuclear and General•Nov 21, 1974•29 citations
The free-energy density of a one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau field with nnn components ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{3}$ is identified with the quantum-mechanical ground-state energy of an nnn-dimensional anharmonic oscillator. Normalizing the anharmonic term by ${(4n)}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and expanding in powers of ${n}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, we find for the ground-state energy, $n{E}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}+{E}^{(1)}+{n}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{E}^{(2)}$, where ${E}_{\ensuremath{\infty}}=\frac{\ensuremath{\kappa}}{2}\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{16{\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{2}}$, and ${E}^{(1)}=\frac{({\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}\ensuremath{-}2\ensuremath{\kappa})}{2}$ and ${E}^{(2)}=3{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}^{\ensuremath{-}2}\ensuremath{-}6\ensuremath{\kappa}{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}^{\ensuremath{-}3}\ensuremath{-}(\frac{11}{4}){\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$ are the Hartree and first and second screening approximations, respectively. $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ and ${\ensuremath{\kappa}}_{2}={(4{\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{2}+{\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{\ensuremath{-}1})}^{\frac{1}{2}}$ are the inverse correlation lengths for ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{i}$ and $\ensuremath{\Sigma}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_{i}^{2}$ respectively. The temperature is linearly related to the spring constant $\ensuremath{\tau}$, which in turn is connected with the correlation lengths by $\ensuremath{\tau}={\ensuremath{\kappa}}^{2}\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2\ensuremath{\kappa}}$. The analytic results are compared with exact numerical computations for n=1,2,3,and4n=1, 2, 3, \mathrm{and} 4n=1,2,3,and4. The second screening correction modestly improves the accuracy of the approximation.