Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chemical Physics Letters

Comment regarding the paper entitled “is antisymmetrization necessary?”

Ruud Block, Laurens Jansen

Published Sep 1, 1980• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0009-2614(80)85185-2

Related papers

Comment on E. E. Witmer's Article entitled “Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Future of Physics”

Herman Erlichson

American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1968•0 citations

Consequences of Antisymmetry

Valentina Bianchi

De Gruyter eBooks•Dec 31, 1999•273 citations

Comment on "Temperature dependent fluctuations in the two-dimensional XY model"

Guillermo Palma

We comment the recent published article entitled "Temperature dependent fluctuations in the two-dimensional XY model", appeared in J. Phys. A: Math.Gen. 38 (2005) 5603.

arXiv:cond-mat/0507655•Jul 27, 2005•0 citations

A note on the symmetrization postulate and cluster property

M. E. Arons

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Jun 1, 1969•2 citations

The Source of the Symmetrization Postulate

Tomasz Bigaj

New directions in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Zeno's Paradoxes: A Timely Solution

Peter Lynds

Zeno of Elea's motion and infinity paradoxes, excluding the Stadium, are stated (1), commented on (2), and their historical proposed solutions then discussed (3). Their correct solution, based on recent conclusions in physics associated with time and classical and quantum mechanics, and in particular, of there being a necessary trade off of all precisely determined physical values at a time (including relative position), for their continuity through time, is then explained (4). This article follows on from another, more physics orientated and widely encompassing paper entitled "Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs. Discontinuity" (Lynds, 2003), with its intention being to detail the correct solution to Zeno's paradoxes more fully by presently focusing on them alone. If any difficulties are encountered in understanding any aspects of the physics underpinning the following contents, it is suggested that readers refer to the original paper for a more in depth coverage.

•Jan 1, 2003•17 citations
Zeno of Elea's motion and infinity paradoxes, excluding the Stadium, are stated (1), commented on (2), and their historical proposed solutions then discussed (3). Their correct solution, based on recent conclusions in physics associated with time and classical and quantum mechanics, and in particular, of there being a necessary trade off of all precisely determined physical values at a time (including relative position), for their continuity through time, is then explained (4). This article follows on from another, more physics orientated and widely encompassing paper entitled "Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs. Discontinuity" (Lynds, 2003), with its intention being to detail the correct solution to Zeno's paradoxes more fully by presently focusing on them alone. If any difficulties are encountered in understanding any aspects of the physics underpinning the following contents, it is suggested that readers refer to the original paper for a more in depth coverage.