Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Computer Physics Communications

Microcanonical simulation for the three-state Potts model

Jean-Michel Drouffe, Kevin J. M. Moriarty

Published May 1, 1991• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0010-4655(91)90031-f

Related papers

Microcanonical transfer matrix study of the Q-state Potts model

Richard J. Creswick, Seung‐Yeon Kim

arXiv:cond-mat/9810153•Computer Physics Communications•Sep 1, 1999•11 citations

Large scale numerical simulation of the three-state Potts model

Shigemi Ohta

arXiv:hep-lat/9212028•Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements•Mar 1, 1993•2 citations

Microcanonical Transfer Matrix and Yang-Lee Zeros of the Q-State Potts Model

Rick J. Creswick, S.-Y. Kim

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Monte Carlo simulation of the three-dimensional Potts model

Hans Jürgen Herrmann

The European Physical Journal B•Jun 1, 1979•68 citations

Monte Carlo simulations of conformal theory predictions for the three-state Potts model

G. T. Barkema, John McCabe

arXiv:hep-lat/9510050•Journal of Statistical Physics•Sep 1, 1996•8 citations

Microcanonical finite-size scaling in second-order phase transitions with diverging specific heat

L. A. Fernández, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, Víctor Martín-Mayor +1 more

A microcanonical finite-size ansatz in terms of quantities measurable in a finite lattice allows extending phenomenological renormalization (the so-called quotients method) to the microcanonical ensemble. The ansatz is tested numerically in two models where the canonical specific heat diverges at criticality, thus implying Fisher renormalization of the critical exponents: the three-dimensional ferromagnetic Ising model and the two-dimensional four-state Potts model (where large logarithmic corrections are known to occur in the canonical ensemble). A recently proposed microcanonical cluster method allows simulating systems as large as L=1024 (Potts) or L=128 (Ising). The quotients method provides accurate determinations of the anomalous dimension, eta, and of the (Fisher-renormalized) thermal nu exponent. While in the Ising model the numerical agreement with our theoretical expectations is very good, in the Potts case, we need to carefully incorporate logarithmic corrections to the microcanonical ansatz in order to rationalize our data.

arXiv:0905.4029•Physical Review E•Nov 6, 2009•8 citations
A microcanonical finite-size ansatz in terms of quantities measurable in a finite lattice allows extending phenomenological renormalization (the so-called quotients method) to the microcanonical ensemble. The ansatz is tested numerically in two models where the canonical specific heat diverges at criticality, thus implying Fisher renormalization of the critical exponents: the three-dimensional ferromagnetic Ising model and the two-dimensional four-state Potts model (where large logarithmic corrections are known to occur in the canonical ensemble). A recently proposed microcanonical cluster method allows simulating systems as large as L=1024 (Potts) or L=128 (Ising). The quotients method provides accurate determinations of the anomalous dimension, eta, and of the (Fisher-renormalized) thermal nu exponent. While in the Ising model the numerical agreement with our theoretical expectations is very good, in the Potts case, we need to carefully incorporate logarithmic corrections to the microcanonical ansatz in order to rationalize our data.