Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical Computer Science

Adaptively secure distributed public-key systems

Yair Frankel, PHILIP D. MACKENZIE, Moti M. Yung

Published Sep 1, 2002• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0304-3975(01)00260-2

Related papers

Adaptively-Secure Distributed Public-Key Systems

Yair Frankel, PHILIP D. MACKENZIE, Moti M. Yung

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 1999•43 citations

An Efficient Two-Party Public Key Cryptosystem Secure against Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attack

Philip Mac Kenzie

Lecture notes in computer science•Dec 18, 2002•12 citations

An efficient threshold public key cryptosystem secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack

Ran Canetti, Shafi Goldwasser

Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques•May 2, 1999•142 citations

Deterministic Public-Key Encryption for Adaptively Chosen Plaintext Distributions.

Ananth Raghunathan, Gil Segev, Salil Vadhan

Bellare, Boldyreva, and O’Neill (CRYPTO ’07) initiated the study of deterministic public-key encryption as an alternative in scenarios where randomized encryption has inherent drawbacks. Theresultinglineofresearchhassofarguaranteedsecurityonlyforadversarially-chosenplaintext distributions that are independent of the public key used by the scheme. In most scenarios, however, it is typically not realistic to assume that adversaries do not take the public key into account when attacking a scheme. We show that it is possible to guarantee meaningful security even for plaintext distributions that depend on the public key. We extend the previously proposed notions of security, allowing adversaries to adaptively choose plaintext distributions after seeing the public key, in an interactive manner. The onlyrestrictionswemakearethat: (1) plaintextdistributionsareunpredictable (as is essential in deterministic public-key encryption), and (2) the number of plaintext distributions from which each adversary is allowed to adaptively choose is upper bounded by 2 p, where p can be any predetermined polynomial in the security parameter. For example, with p = 0 we capture plaintext distributions that are independent of the public key, and with p = O(slogs)

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Adaptively-Secure, Non-interactive Public-Key Encryption

Ran Canetti, Shai Halevi, Jonathan I. Katz

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2005•69 citations

Scalable Public Key Distribution

Brian May, Hong Ren Wu

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations
Bellare, Boldyreva, and O’Neill (CRYPTO ’07) initiated the study of deterministic public-key encryption as an alternative in scenarios where randomized encryption has inherent drawbacks. Theresultinglineofresearchhassofarguaranteedsecurityonlyforadversarially-chosenplaintext distributions that are independent of the public key used by the scheme. In most scenarios, however, it is typically not realistic to assume that adversaries do not take the public key into account when attacking a scheme. We show that it is possible to guarantee meaningful security even for plaintext distributions that depend on the public key. We extend the previously proposed notions of security, allowing adversaries to adaptively choose plaintext distributions after seeing the public key, in an interactive manner. The onlyrestrictionswemakearethat: (1) plaintextdistributionsareunpredictable (as is essential in deterministic public-key encryption), and (2) the number of plaintext distributions from which each adversary is allowed to adaptively choose is upper bounded by 2 p, where p can be any predetermined polynomial in the security parameter. For example, with p = 0 we capture plaintext distributions that are independent of the public key, and with p = O(slogs)