Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Optical gain and grating structure in the collective atomic recoil laser

Junli Wang, Yao-Jun Qiao, Wenjun Fan, Peng‐Wang Zhai, Jin-Yue Gao

Published Apr 1, 1999• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00085-7

Related papers

Matter wave optics theory of the collective atomic recoil laser

Michael Moore, Pierre Meystre

APS•May 1, 1998•0 citations

Propagation effects in a collective atomic recoil laser

R. Bonifacio, L De Salvo, Gordon R. M. Robb

Optics Communications•May 1, 1997•2 citations

Relativistic theory of the collective atomic recoil laser

R. Bonifacio, L. De Salvo, William A. Barletta

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment•Jan 1, 1997•2 citations

Doppler broadening and collision effects in a collective atomic recoil laser

R. Bonifacio, Philippe Verkerk

Optics Communications•Mar 1, 1996•24 citations

Laser Beam Amplification Resulting From Collective Atomic Recoil

Daniel J. Gauthier, William O. Brown, Jeffrey R. Gardner +1 more

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Optical gratings in the collective interaction between radiation and atoms, including recoil and collisions

M. Perrin, Gian Luca Lippi, Antonio Politi

The introduction of collisions and of a thermal distribution for the atomic momentum in the model for the Collective Atomic Recoil Laser (CARL) is at the origin of important modifications in the interpretation of the mechanisms that give rise to the amplification of the backreflected wave. It is shown that the atomic density grating, considered to be the cause of gain in CARL, disappears in the presence of collisions, while other gratings—in population and polarization phase—survive. While the population grating appears to be merely a consequence of the collective interaction, the latter is the likely cause for the instability. Finally, simulations show that models that make use of an exponential relaxation mechanism for the atomic momentum,rather than accounting for collisions explicitly, largely overestimate the strength of the interaction.

Journal of Modern Optics•Mar 1, 2002•9 citations
The introduction of collisions and of a thermal distribution for the atomic momentum in the model for the Collective Atomic Recoil Laser (CARL) is at the origin of important modifications in the interpretation of the mechanisms that give rise to the amplification of the backreflected wave. It is shown that the atomic density grating, considered to be the cause of gain in CARL, disappears in the presence of collisions, while other gratings—in population and polarization phase—survive. While the population grating appears to be merely a consequence of the collective interaction, the latter is the likely cause for the instability. Finally, simulations show that models that make use of an exponential relaxation mechanism for the atomic momentum,rather than accounting for collisions explicitly, largely overestimate the strength of the interaction.