By comparison between equations of motion of geometrical optics and that of classical statistical mechanics, this paper finds that there should be an analogy between geometrical optics and classical statistical mechanics instead of geometrical mechanics and classical mechanics. Furthermore, by comparison between the classical limit of quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics, it finds that classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical statistical mechanics not classical mechanics, hence it demonstrates that quantum mechanics is a natural generalization of classical statistical mechanics instead of classical mechanics. Thence quantum mechanics in its true appearance is a wave statistical mechanics instead of a wave mechanics.
By comparison between equations of motion of geometrical optics and that of classical statistical mechanics, this paper finds that there should be an analogy between geometrical optics and classical statistical mechanics instead of geometrical mechanics and classical mechanics. Furthermore, by comparison between the classical limit of quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics, it finds that classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical statistical mechanics not classical mechanics, hence it demonstrates that quantum mechanics is a natural generalization of classical statistical mechanics instead of classical mechanics. Thence quantum mechanics in its true appearance is a wave statistical mechanics instead of a wave mechanics.
Classical statistical average values are generally generalized to average values of quantum mechanics, it is discovered that quantum mechanics is direct generalization of classical statistical mechanics, and we generally deduce both a general new continuous eigenvalue equation and a general discrete eigenvalue equation in quantum mechanics, and discover that a eigenvalue of quantum mechanics is just an extreme value of an operator in possibility distribution, the eigenvalue f is just classical observable quantity. A general classical statistical uncertain relation is further given, the general classical statistical uncertain relation is generally generalized to quantum uncertainty principle, the two lost conditions in classical uncertain relation and quantum uncertainty principle, respectively, are found. We generally expound the relations among uncertainty principle, singularity and condensed matter stability, discover that quantum uncertainty principle prevents from the appearance of singularity of the electromagnetic potential between nucleus and electrons, and give the failure conditions of quantum uncertainty principle. Finally, we discover that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical statistical mechanics, the classical statistical mechanics may further be degenerated to classical mechanics, and we discover that only saying that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical mechanics is mistake. As application examples, we deduce both Shrodinger equation and state superposition principle, deduce that there exist decoherent factor from a general mathematical representation of state superposition principle, and the consistent difficulty between statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics and determinant property of classical mechanics is overcome.
Classical statistical average values are generally generalized to average values of quantum mechanics. It is discovered that quantum mechanics is a direct generalization of classical statistical mechanics, and we generally deduce both a new general continuous eigenvalue equation and a general discrete eigenvalue equation in quantum mechanics, and discover that a eigenvalue of quantum mechanics is just an extreme value of an operator in possibility distribution, the eigenvalue f is just classical observable quantity. A general classical statistical uncertain relation is further given, and the general classical statistical uncertain relation is generally generalized to the quantum uncertainty principle; the two lost conditions in classical uncertain relation and quantum uncertainty principle, respectively, are found. We generally expound the relations among the uncertainty principle, singularity and condensed matter stability, discover that the quantum uncertainty principle prevents the appearance of singularity of the electromagnetic potential between nucleus and electrons, and give the failure conditions of the quantum uncertainty principle. Finally, we discover that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical statistical mechanics, the classical statistical mechanics may further be degenerated to classical mechanics and we discover that merely stating that the classical limit of quantum mechanics is classical mechanics is a mistake. As application examples, we deduce both the Schrödinger equation and the state superposition principle, and deduce that there exists a decoherent factor from a general mathematical representation of the state superposition principle; the consistent difficulty between statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics and determinant property of classical mechanics is overcome.
According to Schroedinger's ideas, classical dynamics of point particles should correspond to the " geometrical optics " limit of a linear wave equation, in the same way as ray optics is the limit of wave optics. It is shown that, using notions of modern wave theory, the " geometrical optics " analogy leads to the correspondence between a classical Hamiltonian H and a " quantum " wave equation in a natural and general way. In particular, the correspondence is unambiguous also in the case where H contains mixed terms involving momentum and position. In the line of Schroedinger's ideas, it is also attempted to justify the occurrence, in QM, of eigenvalues problems, not merely for energy, but also for momentum. It is shown that the wave functions of pure momentum states can be defined in a physically more satisfying way than by assuming plane waves. In the case of a spatially uniform force field, such momentum states have a singularity and move undeformed according to Newton's second law. The mentioned unambiguous correspondence allows to uniquely extend the Klein-Gordon relativistic wave equation to the case where a constant gravitational field is present. It is argued that Schroedinger's wave mechanics can be extended to the case with a variable gravitational field only if one accepts that the wave equation is a preferred-frame one. From this viewpoint, generally-covariant extensions of the wave equations of QM seem rather formal. Finally, it is conjectured that there is no need for a quantum gravity.
Instead of regarding the classical limit as the limit ℏ→0, an alternative view based on the physical interpretation of the elements of the density matrix is proposed. The derivation of the classical limit of quantum mechanics is carried out in two stages. First, the statistical classical limit is derived, and then, with an appropriate initial condition, the deterministic classical limit is obtained. The derivation hinges on the use of the Feynman path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of the density matrix. It is shown that deterministic (Hamilton’s or Newton’s) classical mehanics is not the classical limit of Schrödinger’s wave mechanics. The classical limit of Schrödinger’s wave mechanics is only statistical and corresponds to the classical Liouville equation. In order to obtain the deterministic classical limit, it is necessary to start out initially with a quantum mechanical mixture.
Both quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics predict the same momentum and spatial density forms forms for the solution of an oscillator. In the case of quantum mechanics, the ground state is considered. One may ask whether this is a coincidence, and if not, why two seemingly different theories should lead to the same result for the oscillator case. We argue in this note that it is the form of the conservation equation of the oscillator which leads to x and p having the same probability distribution.Furthermore, given that both quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics are of a statistical nature, one may inquire into the actual nature of the statistics being used, the meaning behind averages being used. For example, the classical deterministic solution of an oscillator can be written in statistical terms by removing time dependence and using density = dx/v. This does not mean, however, that the actual physical motion is no longer deterministic. In addition, we try to argue that quantum mechanics may be a more detailed statistical model including dynamics which satisfies the more static statistical result of spatial density for classical statistical mechanics.