Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Publisher's Note: “Understanding quantum interference in general nonlocality” [J. Math. Phys. 52, 033510 (2011)]

Hai-Jun Wang

Published May 1, 2011• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.3592673

Related papers

Publisher’s Note: Interference schemes and entanglement determination [Phys. Rev. A65, 024304 (2002)]

Josep Amengual i Batle, M. Casas, Angel Ricardo Plastino +1 more

Physical Review A•Apr 10, 2002•0 citations

Publisher's Note: Conclusive exclusion of quantum states [Phys. Rev. A89, 022336 (2014)]

Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay, Rahul Jain, Jonathan Oppenheim +1 more

Physical Review A•Jul 18, 2014•0 citations

Quantum nonlocality and interference in frequency domain

Miloslav Dušek

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1996•4 citations

Understanding quantum interference in general nonlocality

Hai-Jun Wang

In this paper we attempt to give a new understanding of quantum double-slit interference of fermions in the framework of general nonlocality (GN) [J. Math. Phys. 49, 033513 (2008)] by studying the self-(inter)action of matter wave. From the metric of the GN, we derive a special formalism to interpret the interference contrast when the self-action is perturbative. According to the formalism, the characteristic of interference pattern is in agreement with experiment qualitatively. As examples, we apply the formalism to the cases governed by Schrödinger current and Dirac current, respectively, both of which are relevant to topology. The gap between these two cases corresponds to the fermion magnetic moment, which is possible to test in the near future. In addition, a general interference formalism for both perturbative and nonperturbative self-actions is presented. By analyzing the general formalism we predict that in the nonperturbative limit there is no interference at all. And by comparison with the special formalism of Schrödinger current, the coupling strength of self-action in the limit is found to be ∞. In the perturbative case, the interference from self-action turns out to be the same as that from the standard approach of quantum theory. Then comparing the corresponding coefficients quantitatively we conclude that the coupling strength of self-action in this case falls in the interval [0, 1].

arXiv:1011.5258•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 2011•1 citation

Quantum interference and the quantum potential

Chris Philippidis, Christopher Dewdney, Basil J. Hiley

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Jul 1, 1979•381 citations

Publisher’s Note: “A generalization of the Lagrange–Hamilton formalism with application to non-conservative systems and the quantum to classical transition” [J. Math. Phys. 62, 033503 (2021)]

R.S. Langley

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 2021•0 citations
In this paper we attempt to give a new understanding of quantum double-slit interference of fermions in the framework of general nonlocality (GN) [J. Math. Phys. 49, 033513 (2008)] by studying the self-(inter)action of matter wave. From the metric of the GN, we derive a special formalism to interpret the interference contrast when the self-action is perturbative. According to the formalism, the characteristic of interference pattern is in agreement with experiment qualitatively. As examples, we apply the formalism to the cases governed by Schrödinger current and Dirac current, respectively, both of which are relevant to topology. The gap between these two cases corresponds to the fermion magnetic moment, which is possible to test in the near future. In addition, a general interference formalism for both perturbative and nonperturbative self-actions is presented. By analyzing the general formalism we predict that in the nonperturbative limit there is no interference at all. And by comparison with the special formalism of Schrödinger current, the coupling strength of self-action in the limit is found to be ∞. In the perturbative case, the interference from self-action turns out to be the same as that from the standard approach of quantum theory. Then comparing the corresponding coefficients quantitatively we conclude that the coupling strength of self-action in this case falls in the interval [0, 1].