We developed a purely field model of microphenomena — prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This model reproduces important probabilistic predictions of QM including correlations for entangled systems. Hence, the wave-particle duality can be resolved in favor of a purely wave model. In PCSFT "particles" are just clicks of detectors.
We developed a purely field model of microphenomena — prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This model reproduces important probabilistic predictions of QM including correlations for entangled systems. Hence, the wave-particle duality can be resolved in favor of a purely wave model. In PCSFT "particles" are just clicks of detectors.
In a series of previous papers we developed a purely wave model of microphenomena, the so-called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). Important probabilistic predictions of QM including correlations of entangled systems can be reproduced by PCSFT. In this note we show that our model provides even a possibility to go beyond QM. By PCSFT each conventional QM-observable is represented by the corresponding quadratic functional of the prequantum field. Consideration of nonquadratic functionals in the PCSFT framework extends essentially the class of observables on microsystems, comparing with QM. In this note we restrict our studies to simplest functionals of such type, namely, to the linear functionals. In particular, components of the prequantum field are represented as these functionals. We find their correlations. As an example, we find the correlation between polarization vectors of a pair of entangled photons in the Bell state. This is a new prediction that in principle can be experimentally checked, even if actual experiments may require essential improvements of our present instrumentation.
In a series of previous papers we developed a purely field model of microphenomena, so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This model not only reproduces important probabilistic predictions of QM including correlations for entangled systems, but it also gives a possibility to go beyond quantum mechanics (QM), i.e., to make predictions of phenomena which could be observed at the subquantum level. In this paper we discuss one of such predictions - existence of nonlocal correlations between prequantum random fields corresponding to {\it all} quantum systems. (And by PCSFT quantum systems are represented by classical Gaussian random fields and quantum observables by quadratic forms of these fields.) The source of these correlations is the common background field. Thus all prequantum random fields are "entangled", but in the sense of classical signal theory. On one hand, PCSFT demystifies quantum nonlocality by reducing it to nonlocal classical correlations based on the common random background. On the other hand, it demonstrates total generality of such correlations. They exist even for distinguishable quantum systems in factorizable states (by PCSFT terminology - for Gaussian random fields with covariance operators corresponding to factorizable quantum states).
The idea that quantum mechanics (QM) is simply a version of classical field theory is very old. Recently this idea has been realized in a new mathematical framework - on the basis of theory of random fields (L2-valued random variables). Surprisingly (for at least orthodox Copenhagenist) fundamental predictions of QM can be reproduced on the basis of a purely wave model (prequantum classical statistical field theory, PCSFT). In particular, all quantum correlations (including correlations of composite systems in entangled states) can be represented as correlations of classical random signals. These signals fluctuate at the space-time scale which is essentially finer than the scale of quantum measurements. At the moment we are not able to monitor such signals. However, one can expect that increasing of the precision of measurements will provide such a possibility. In this paper we show that bosonic and fermionic correlations can be obtained in the classical field framework. Finally, we stress that QM can be reduced to theory of classical random fields only in the presence of a relatively strong background field.
All previous chapters of this book were devoted to the development of the theory of classical (prequantum) random fields reproducing quantum averages (including correlations for entangled systems) as averages of quadratic forms of fields. Since the basic model of prequantum fields is the Gaussian one, these fields are continuous. Hence, in the same way as in the classical signal theory, averages are calculated for variables with a continuous range of values. This model, PCSFT, is really a prequantum model. In accordance with the Bohr’s viewpoint, we consider QM as an operational formalism describing (predicting) results of measurements on microsystems. QM cannot describe intrinsic physical processes in the microworld, but onlymeasurements performed bymacroscopic classical devices. In contrast, PCSFT describes intrinsic processes in the microworld. However, it does not describe results of measurements on the level of individual events, clicks of detectors. As we pointed in Section 1.1.8, in principle one might be satisfied with creation of a prequantum model which reproduces only quantum probabilistic predictions, i.e., without establishing a direct connectionwith theory of measurement on the level of individual events. This approach would match with views of Schro¨dinger and the Bild concept in general. However, historical development of QM demonstrated that the Bild concept was not attractive for the majority of physicists. Since the experimental verification is considered as the basic counterpart of any physical theory, Bild-like prequantum theories are considered as metaphysical. Measurement theory connecting PCSFT with experiment on the level of individual events was developed in my paper [211] (see also Refs. [209, 210, 212, 213]). In this paper I elaborated a scheme of discrete measurements of classical random signals which reproduces the basic rule of QM, the Born’s rule. This is the scheme of threshold-type detection: such a detector clicks after it has “eaten” a special portion of energy
The similarity between classical wave mechanics and quantum mechanics (QM) played an important role in the development of QM (starting with works of De Broglie, Schrödinger, "late Einstein", Lamb, Lande, Mandel, Marshall, Santos, Boyer, and many others). We present a new wave-type approach, so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). PCSFT explores an analogy between some quantum phenomena and classical theory of random fields. Quantum systems are interpreted as symbolic representations of such fields (not only for photons, cf. Lande and Lamb, but even for massive particles). All quantum averages and correlations (including composite systems in entangled states) can be represented as averages and correlations for classical random fields. In this paper PCSFT is used to provide a classical signal representation of bunching and anti-bunching. At least the latter is typically considered as essentially quantum (nonclassical) phenomenon.
Prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT) is a new attempt to consider quantum mechanics (QM) as an emergent phenomenon, cf. with De Broglie's "double solution" approach, Bohmian mechanics, stochastic electrodynamics (SED), Nelson's stochastic QM and its generalization by Davidson, 't Hooft's models and their development by Elze. PCSFT is a comeback to a purely wave viewpoint on QM, cf. with early Schrodinger. There is no quantum particles at all, only waves. In particular, photons are simply wave-pulses of the classical electromagnetic field, cf. SED. Moreover, even massive particles are special "prequantum fields": the electron field, the neutron field, and so on. PCSFT claims that (sooner or later) people will be able to measure components of these fields: components of the "photonic field" (the classical electromagnetic field of low intensity), electronic field, neutronic field, and so on. At the moment we are able to produce quantum correlations as correlations of classical Gaussian random fields. In this paper we are interested in mathematical and physical reasons of usage of Gaussian fields. We consider prequantum signals (corresponding to quantum systems) as composed of a huge number of wave-pulses (on very fine prequantum time scale). We speculate that the prequantum background field (the field of "vacuum fluctuations") might play the role of a source of such pulses, i.e., the source of everything.