Pathlength modulation interferometers operating at the single-photon level allow the transmission of conventionally encrypted messages with greatly increased security. By modulating pathlength differences, Alice and Bob can prevent Eve from having access to the ciphertext.
Physical-layer security offers an alternative to cryptology, where instead of using the secrecy keys, randomness of the wireless channel is utilized to conceal information. In this chapter, we give an overview of different state-of-the-art multi-terminal information theoretic models to secure information with varying quality of channel state information at the transmitter. We first introduce the essential elements of information theoretic security, and later on discuss its application from a degrees of freedom viewpoint. In particular, we focus our attention on the models in which the topology of the network is known at the transmitter. Introduction Wireless communication has completely revolutionized the lives of common users. Modern communication systems provide high data rates, which allow users to perform different day-to-day tasks wirelessly. For example, users can access their bank account details and monitor their home security remotely. However, due to the broadcast nature of the medium, the information exchange between these communication nodes can be overheard by unintended users in the network. The leakage of information to unintended users may have serious consequences. In this chapter, we intend to answer this fundamental question of how to secure wireless communication. State of the Art and Preliminaries In conventional systems, cryptographic encryption is used to conceal information from adversaries. Figure 7.1 shows a simple example which sheds light on the problem of secret key sharing studied in cryptology. The source message at Alice is converted to ciphertext with the help of a secret key which is shared between Alice and the legitimate receiver, Bob. The ciphertext is then communicated over the wireless channel and is received by both Bob and Eve. Upon getting the ciphertext and having access to the secret key, Bob can easily recover Alice's message [1]. It is assumed that Eve, the eavesdropper, is of limited computational complexity or has limited resources. Thus, it is unable to generate all combinations of secret key, and consequently cannot recover Alice's message. In this framework, secrecy relies on the difficulty level of some hard mathematical problem which the eavesdropper is unable to solve due to limited computational resources.
For thousands of years, code-makers and code-breakers have been competing for supremacy. Their arsenals may soon include a powerful new weapon: quantum mechanics. Cryptography — the art of code-making — has a long history of military and diplomatic applications, dating back to the Babylonians. In World World Two, the Allies ’ feat of breaking the legendary German code, Enigma, contributed greatly to the final Allied victory. Nowadays, cryptography is becoming increasingly important in commercial applications for electronic business and electronic commerce. Sensitive data such as credit card numbers and personal identification numbers (PINs) are routinely transmitted in encrypted form. Quantum mechanics is a new tool for both code-breakers and code-makers in their eternal arms race. It has the potential to revolutionize cryptography both by creating perfectly secure codes and by breaking standard encryption schemes. The most well-known application of cryptography is secure communication [1]. Suppose Alice would like to send a message to Bob, but there is an eavesdropper, Eve, who is wiretapping the channel. To prevent Eve from knowing the message, Alice and Bob may perform encryption, i.e., transform the message to something that is not intelligible to Eve during the communication. On receiving the message, Bob inverts the transformation and recovers the message (see figure 1). Bob’s advantage over Eve lies in his knowledge of a secret, commonly called the key, that he shares with Alice. The key tells him how to decode the message. For example: The rumble of Soviet tanks shook the Prague hotel room (number 117) as secret agent John Blond finished decoding his orders from his superior N. He tore the used page from the codebook and immediately burned it with his lighter. Blond is using a perfectly unbreakable cipher, a “one-time pad. ” The secret codebook allows N and Blond to share a long secret binary string — the key —
This paper proposes a quantum secure communication protocol using multiple photons to represent each bit of a message to be shared. The multi-photon tolerant approach to quantum cryptography provides a quantum level security while using more than a single photon per transmission. The protocol proposed is a multi-stage protocol; an explanation of its operation and implementation are provided. The multi-stage protocol is based on the use of unitary transformations known only to Alice and Bob. This paper studies the security aspects of the multi-stage protocol by assessing its vulnerability to different attacks. It is well known that as the number of photons increases, the level of vulnerability of the multi-stage protocol increases. This paper sets a limit on the number of photons that can be used while keeping the multi-stage protocol a multi-photon tolerant quantum secure method for communication. The analysis of the number of photons to be used is based on the probability of success of a Helstrom discrimination done by an eavesdropper on the channel. Limiting the number of photons up to certain threshold per stage makes it impossible for an eavesdropper to decipher the message sent over the channel. The proposed protocol obviates the disadvantages associated with single photon implementations, such as limited data rates and distances along with the need to have no more than a single photon per time slot. The multi-stage protocol is a step toward direct quantum communication rather than quantum key distribution associated with single photon approaches.