The ill-posed problem of quantizing space-time is replaced by a more determined and well-posed problem of regularizing quantum dynamics. \nThe problem is then to eliminate the Heisenberg singularity from quantum mechanics as economically as possible. \n \nThe concepts of regular and singular groups are explained and the Heisenberg singularity defined. This singularity infests not only the theory of space-time, \nbut also the Bose-Einstein statistics and the theory of the gauge fields and interactions. It is responsible for most of the infinities of present quantum field theory. \n \nThe key new conceptual step is to turn attention from observables to "dynamicals", the observable-valued-functions of time which actually enters into the Heisenberg dynamical equations. The dynamicals have separate algebras from the algebra and Lie algebra of the observables. This reconception allows for the possibility of clock-system entanglement that is missing from the usual singular dynamics, and implied by the concept of quantum space-time. \n\nThe dynamical Lie algebra and the resulting Lie group are regularized for an example system, the time-dependent isotropic harmonic oscillator of arbitrary finite dimension. The result is a quantize space-time, but also momentum-energy and every other dynamical variable in the theory. This method is readily extended to general dynamic quantum systems.
The ill-posed problem of quantizing space-time is replaced by a more determined and well-posed problem of regularizing quantum dynamics. \nThe problem is then to eliminate the Heisenberg singularity from quantum mechanics as economically as possible. \n \nThe concepts of regular and singular groups are explained and the Heisenberg singularity defined. This singularity infests not only the theory of space-time, \nbut also the Bose-Einstein statistics and the theory of the gauge fields and interactions. It is responsible for most of the infinities of present quantum field theory. \n \nThe key new conceptual step is to turn attention from observables to "dynamicals", the observable-valued-functions of time which actually enters into the Heisenberg dynamical equations. The dynamicals have separate algebras from the algebra and Lie algebra of the observables. This reconception allows for the possibility of clock-system entanglement that is missing from the usual singular dynamics, and implied by the concept of quantum space-time. \n\nThe dynamical Lie algebra and the resulting Lie group are regularized for an example system, the time-dependent isotropic harmonic oscillator of arbitrary finite dimension. The result is a quantize space-time, but also momentum-energy and every other dynamical variable in the theory. This method is readily extended to general dynamic quantum systems.
Arbitrarily small changes in the commutation relations suffice to transform the usual singular quantum theories into regular quantum theories. This process is an extension of canonical quantization that we call general quantization. Here we apply general quantization to the time-independent linear harmonic oscillator. The unstable Heisenberg group becomes the stable group SO(3). This freezes out the zero-point energy of very soft or very hard oscillators, like those responsible for the infrared or ultraviolet divergencies of usual field theories, without much changing the medium oscillators. It produces pronounced violations of equipartition and of the usual uncertainty relations for soft or hard oscillators, and interactions between the previously uncoupled excitation quanta of the oscillator, weakly attractive for medium quanta, strongly repulsive for soft or hard quanta.
A certain infinite-dimensional Lie group, obtained originally by regularizing and then exponentiating a singular local current algebra constructed from canonical fields, has been shown over several decades to describe a wide variety of quantum systems, via its continuous unitary representations. The group is a semidirect product of Schwartz space functions under pointwise addition with a diffeomorphism group under composition. Previously unsuspected possibilities were predicted this way, including anyons and nonabelian anyons in two-dimensional space. Last year David Sharp and I offered a much simpler, direct construction. We proposed fundamental reasons why this group serves as a universal kinematical group for quantum systems with mass in an arbitrary physical space. This paper beyond summarizing that construction, discusses more extensively what it means to obtain quantum mechanics without actually quantizing classical observables in phase space, and answers some fundamental questions. Directions are suggested for obtaining still greater generality of kinematical and dynamical possibilities by modifying the initial assumptions.
Following previous works by E. Prugovečki [Physica A 91A, 202 (1978) and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)] on common features of classical and quantum mechanics, we develop a unified mathematical framework for classical and quantum mechanics (based on L2-spaces over classical phase space), in order to investigate to what extent quantum mechanics can be obtained as a simple modification of classical mechanics (on both logical and analytical levels). To obtain this unified framework, we split quantum theory in two parts: (i) general quantum axiomatics (a system is described by a state in a Hilbert space, observables are self-adjoints operators, and so on) and (ii) quantum mechanics proper that specifies the Hilbert space as L2(Rn); the Heisenberg rule [pi,qj]=−iℏδij with p=−iℏ∇, the free Hamiltonian H=−ℏ2Δ/2m and so on. We show that general quantum axiomatics (up to a supplementary “axiom of classicity”) can be used as a nonstandard mathematical ground to formulate physical ideas and equations of ordinary classical statistical mechanics. So, the question of a “true quantization” with “ℏ” must be seen as an independent physical problem not directly related with quantum formalism. At this stage, we show that this nonstandard formulation of classical mechanics exhibits a new kind of operation that has no classical counterpart: this operation is related to the “quantization process,” and we show why quantization physically depends on group theory (the Galilei group). This analytical procedure of quantization replaces the “correspondence principle” (or canonical quantization) and allows us to map classical mechanics into quantum mechanics, giving all operators of quantum dynamics and the Schrödinger equation. The great advantage of this point of view is that quantization is based on concrete physical arguments and not derived from some “pure algebraic rule” (we exhibit also some limit of the correspondence principle). Moreover spins for particles are naturally generated, including an approximation of their interaction with magnetic fields. We also recover by this approach the semi-classical formalism developed by E. Prugovečki [Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Space–time (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986)].
The Wigner problem, i.e. the investigation of general quantum mechanical commutation relations consistent with the Heisenberg evolution equations of a given shape, is studied. We follow a recently proposed generalization of this idea within which the classical analogy is postulated only for the shape of the time evolution equations and not for a Hamiltonian itself. This links our investigation to the problem of alternative Hamiltonians of classical mechanics and to canonically inequivalent phase-space descriptions of physical systems governed by the same Newton equations of motion. Warned that the time evolution and the other symmetry generators may be given ambiguously even in the formalism of classical mechanics, we do not a priori assume the shape of their quantum analogues. Instead we only require that the set of basic algebraic relations, which quantum mechanical observables are to obey, has a Lie algebra structure. Such a requirement appears to be sufficient to find solutions for simple oscillator-like dynamics. New algebras of quantum mechanical observables are not constructed as a linear envelope of the Heisenberg algebra, and their representations reflect physical results unexpected in the framework of the canonical approach. We illustrate our approach in detail for the example of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using the representation of the generalized coherent states.
In this chapter, we derived some elements of quantum mechanics, which are essential for the further development of our theory: the momentum of a system of Fermions in the second quantization, the coordinate and momentum of a harmonic oscillator as a unique operator at two different moments of time, Boson and Fermion operator algebra, coherent states, the electron-field interaction, the quantization of the electromagnetic field, Boson and Fermion distributions, and densities of states in a degenerate, or a non-degenerate system of Fermions. Our starting point is the wave nature of a quantum particle, the Hamiltonian equations were obtained as group velocities in the two conjugate spaces of the wave, of the coordinates and of the momentum. In this way, the Schr¨odinger equation and the electron-field potential of interaction are obtained from quantum equations generated by the particle wave function.
We start by rewriting classical mechanics in a quantum mechanical fashion and point out that the only difference with quantum theory re- sides at one point. There is a classical analogon of the collapse of the wavefunction and an extension of the usual Born rule is proposed which might solve this problem. We work only with algebra’s over the real (com- plex) numbers, general number fields of finite characteristic allowing for finite dimensional representations of the commutation relations are not considered given that such fields are not well ordered and do not give rise to a well defined probability interpretation. Our theory generalizes however to discrete spacetimes and finite dimensional algebra’s. Looking at physics this way, spacetime itself distinguishes itself algebraically by means of well chosen commutation relations and there is further nothing special about it meaning it has also a particle interpretation just like any other dynamical variable. Likewise, there is no reason for the dynamics to be Hamiltonian and therefore we have a nonconservative formulation of quantum physics at hand. The harmonic oscillator (amongst few oth- ers) distinguishes itself because the algebra forms a finite dimensional Lie algebra; the classical and quantum (discrete) harmonic oscillator are stud- ied in a some more generality and examples are given which are neither classical, nor quantum.