Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Non-bijective canonical transformations in quantum mechanics

J. Deenen

Published Aug 1, 1981• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Proposes a new formulation for the representation of non-bijective canonical transformations in quantum mechanics. These are represented by a unitary operator acting on a Hilbert space H(X)H similar to the one used for the description of a two-dimensional system.
DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/14/8/003

Related papers

Comment on quantum representations of non-bijective canonical transformations

Armando Antillón, B. Lesche, T. H. Seligman

A recent letter by J. Deenen on 'non-bijective canonical transformations in quantum mechanics' (see ibid., vol.14, p.L273, 1981) is analysed and found to be incomplete. The general representation problem of non-bijective canonical transformations is shown to involve infinite sums of the quotient and tensor product spaces defined by Plebanski and Seligman (1982).

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Aug 1, 1982•0 citations

Nonbijective canonical transformations and their representation in quantum mechanics

Peter Krämer, M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1978•29 citations

Non-bijective canonical transformations and their representations in quantum mechanics

Peter Krämer, M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•1 citation

Canonical Transformations in Quantum Mechanics

Arlen Anderson

Quantum canonical transformations are defined algebraically outside of a Hilbert space context. This generalizes the quantum canonical transformations of Weyl and Dirac to include non-unitary transformations. The importance of non-unitary transformations for constructing solutions of the Schr\\"odinger equation is discussed. Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. Each transformation corresponds to a familiar tool used in solving differential equations, and the procedure of solving a differential equation is systematized by the use of the canonical transformations. Several examples are done to illustrate the use of the canonical transformations. [This is an extensively revised version of hep-th-9205080: the first third of the paper is new material; the notation has been simplified, and further discussion has been added to the remainder.]

•May 13, 1993•100 citations

Non-Linear Canonical Transformations in Classical and Quantum Mechanics

Alastair Brodlie

$p$-Mechanics is a consistent physical theory which describes both classical and quantum mechanics simultaneously through the representation theory of the Heisenberg group. In this paper we describe how non-linear canonical transformations affect $p$-mechanical observables and states. Using this we show how canonical transformations change a quantum mechanical system. We seek an operator on the set of $p$-mechanical observables which corresponds to the classical canonical transformation. In order to do this we derive a set of integral equations which when solved will give us the coherent state expansion of this operator. The motivation for these integral equations comes from the work of Moshinsky and a variety of collaborators. We consider a number of examples and discuss the use of these equations for non-bijective transformations.

•Jan 26, 2004•6 citations

Nonlinear canonical transformations and their representations in quantum mechanics

Pier A. Mello, M. Moshińsky

In the last few years an extensive literature has developed on linear canonical tranformations and their representation in quantum mechanics. Applications of these results have been made to clustering theory in nuclei, problems of accidental degeneracy, etc. In the present paper we wish to turn our attention to nonlinear canonical transformations. We show that by dealing with appropriate functions fα (α=1,...,2n) of xi, pi (i=1,...,n) rather than with these variables themselves, we can in principle set unambiguously the equations that determine the representation in quantum mechanics of the canonical transformation under study. This result holds when the old and new functions fα have the same spectrum. We discuss specific examples when this last condition is satisfied: nonlinear canonical transformations in the radial variable that were obtained from projection of linear ones in higher-dimensional spaces; canonical transformations that take us from one Hamiltonian to another with the same spectrum, be this one continuous or discrete; canonical transformations that relate two sets of integrals of motion (which include the Hamiltonians) when we are dealing with phase spaces of dimensions higher than 2, etc. We discuss briefly, in the concluding section, the possibility of extending our analysis to canonical tranformations that do not conserve the spectrum of the relevant operators.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 1975•69 citations
In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.
Quantum canonical transformations are defined algebraically outside of a Hilbert space context. This generalizes the quantum canonical transformations of Weyl and Dirac to include non-unitary transformations. The importance of non-unitary transformations for constructing solutions of the Schr\\"odinger equation is discussed. Three elementary canonical transformations are shown both to have quantum implementations as finite transformations and to generate, classically and infinitesimally, the full canonical algebra. A general canonical transformation can be realized quantum mechanically as a product of these transformations. Each transformation corresponds to a familiar tool used in solving differential equations, and the procedure of solving a differential equation is systematized by the use of the canonical transformations. Several examples are done to illustrate the use of the canonical transformations. [This is an extensively revised version of hep-th-9205080: the first third of the paper is new material; the notation has been simplified, and further discussion has been added to the remainder.]
ppp-Mechanics is a consistent physical theory which describes both classical and quantum mechanics simultaneously through the representation theory of the Heisenberg group. In this paper we describe how non-linear canonical transformations affect ppp-mechanical observables and states. Using this we show how canonical transformations change a quantum mechanical system. We seek an operator on the set of ppp-mechanical observables which corresponds to the classical canonical transformation. In order to do this we derive a set of integral equations which when solved will give us the coherent state expansion of this operator. The motivation for these integral equations comes from the work of Moshinsky and a variety of collaborators. We consider a number of examples and discuss the use of these equations for non-bijective transformations.
In the last few years an extensive literature has developed on linear canonical tranformations and their representation in quantum mechanics. Applications of these results have been made to clustering theory in nuclei, problems of accidental degeneracy, etc. In the present paper we wish to turn our attention to nonlinear canonical transformations. We show that by dealing with appropriate functions fα (α=1,...,2n) of xi, pi (i=1,...,n) rather than with these variables themselves, we can in principle set unambiguously the equations that determine the representation in quantum mechanics of the canonical transformation under study. This result holds when the old and new functions fα have the same spectrum. We discuss specific examples when this last condition is satisfied: nonlinear canonical transformations in the radial variable that were obtained from projection of linear ones in higher-dimensional spaces; canonical transformations that take us from one Hamiltonian to another with the same spectrum, be this one continuous or discrete; canonical transformations that relate two sets of integrals of motion (which include the Hamiltonians) when we are dealing with phase spaces of dimensions higher than 2, etc. We discuss briefly, in the concluding section, the possibility of extending our analysis to canonical tranformations that do not conserve the spectrum of the relevant operators.