Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Progress of Theoretical Physics

The Observables and Localized States of a Dirac Particle

P. M. Mathews, A. Sankaranarayanan

Published May 1, 1962• 11 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It is shown that for a non-zero mass Dirac particle, only one of the four position operators recently discovered by the authors has eigenstates (describing the localized states of the particle) which obey the regularity condition imposed by Newton and Wigner. However, this condition is not applicable to the states of a particle with zero rest mass, and in such a case the multiplicity of possible position (and other) operators persists.

DOI
10.1143/ptp.27.1063

Related papers

On the Uniqueness of the Newton-Wigner Position Operator

D. R. Grigore

It is shown that the quantum position operator of Newton and Wigner for non-zero mass systems is uniquely determined if one imposes a quantum ''manifest covariance'' condition of the same type as the similar condition of Currie, Jordan and Sudarshan in the the framework of the Hamiltonian formalism.

arXiv:hep-th/9302087•Feb 19, 1993•0 citations

On the Localizability of Massless Particles

Eugenios Angelopoulos, F. Bayen, Mosh� Flato

Wightman's reformulation of the Wigner-Newton position operators and localizability of a massive particle is generalized so as to include zero mass particles. Different a priori procedures of generalizations are examined: we first prove some negative results based upon a projective induction technique. We then present some positive results which state that in some sense zero-mass particles are localizable and that their corresponding position operators are candidates for observables. Our treatment–which is group theoretical and kinematical in the same sense as that of Wightman–ends with suggestions for further possible developments.

Physica Scripta•Mar 1, 1974•27 citations

Lorentz-Invariant Localization for Elementary Systems. III. Zero-Mass Systems

Andrés J. Kálnay

The present series of papers is devoted to the localization problem in relativistic quantum mechanics. The consequences of imposing the condition that the descriptions of a localized state seen from two different frames of reference should be physically consistent were investigated in Paper II. Only instantaneous localization was studied. Considering elementary systems of nonzero mass and spin 0 and \textonehalf{}, the following results were found. (a) As regards the localization problem, one cannot avoid accepting at least one of the following strong departures from the usual ideas: (i) Position has no meaning; (ii) it violates the physical equivalence of inertial frames; (iii) it is the only quantum variable which cannot be represented by an operator; (iv) it is non-Hermitian; (v) some unusual interaction effects do not disappear when the interaction is switched off. (b) If a component of position is to be precisely measurable as a point, then for spin 0 there is only one possible position operator; for spin \textonehalf{} the operator is unique up to a parameter; in both cases the operators are non-Hermitian with respect to the relativistically invariant scalar product, but in spite of this the eigenvalues of all components are real. The components of position are compatible with each other for spin 0 and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. The communication relations of position with linear momentum are the standard ones. The velocity operator, which is Hermitian, has the expected form. Several authors have stated that the localization problem can have a solution for mass greater than zero, but for the zero-mass case a solution does not exist. In this paper the localization problem is studied for zero-mass elementary systems by only imposing, as in Paper II, the above requirement of physical consistency. We consider systems with spin 0, \textonehalf{}, and 1. We prove that the consequences are essentially the same as those obtained for systems of mass greater than zero. The parameter is no longer arbitrary.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•May 15, 1971•15 citations

Aspects of particle localisation in quantum mechanics

G.F. Melloy

The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Spin operator in the Dirac theory

Paweł Caban, Jakub Rembieliński, Marta Włodarczyk

We find all spin operators for a Dirac particle satisfying the following very general conditions: (i) spin does not convert positive (negative) energy states into negative (positive) energy states, (ii) spin is a pseudovector, and (iii) eigenvalues of the projection of a spin operator in an arbitrary direction are independent of this direction (isotropy condition). We show that there are four such operators and all of them fulfill the standard su(2) Lie algebra commutation relations. Nevertheless, only one of them has a proper nonrelativistic limit and acts in the same way on negative and positive energy states. We show also that this operator is equivalent to the Newton-Wigner spin operator and Foldy-Wouthuysen mean-spin operator. We also discuss another operator proposed in the literature.

arXiv:1308.4313•Physical Review A•Aug 22, 2013•31 citations

Lorentz-Invariant Localization for Elementary Systems. IV. The Nonrelativistic Limit

Andrés J. Kálnay, P. L. Torres

In parts II and III of the present series of papers, the localization problem was studied for the relativistic nonzero-mass (spin 0 and \textonehalf{}) and zero-mass (spin 0, \textonehalf{}, and 1) cases. With a set of postulates of which the basic one was the imposition of Lorentz invariance of localization (which is a self-consistency requirement), it was possible to define the position operator uniquely (except for a constant for spin \textonehalf{}, nonzero mass). However, the position operator has unusual properties, e.g., non-Hermiticity. This does not preclude its having physical meaning, but is such a strange result that in the present paper we test the validity of the postulates in the nonrelativistic case (spin 0 and \textonehalf{}) where the position operator is well known. We use the same set of postulates, except that here we impose the Galilean invariance of localization. The result of the test is positive; the position operator found is the usual one. Moreover, with our set of postulates, we restate the notion of localization in a more physical basis, giving a precise definition of it without imposing avoidable requirements.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jun 15, 1971•4 citations
It is shown that for a non-zero mass Dirac particle, only one of the four position operators recently discovered by the authors has eigenstates (describing the localized states of the particle) which obey the regularity condition imposed by Newton and Wigner. However, this condition is not applicable to the states of a particle with zero rest mass, and in such a case the multiplicity of possible position (and other) operators persists.
Wightman's reformulation of the Wigner-Newton position operators and localizability of a massive particle is generalized so as to include zero mass particles. Different a priori procedures of generalizations are examined: we first prove some negative results based upon a projective induction technique. We then present some positive results which state that in some sense zero-mass particles are localizable and that their corresponding position operators are candidates for observables. Our treatment–which is group theoretical and kinematical in the same sense as that of Wightman–ends with suggestions for further possible developments.
The present series of papers is devoted to the localization problem in relativistic quantum mechanics. The consequences of imposing the condition that the descriptions of a localized state seen from two different frames of reference should be physically consistent were investigated in Paper II. Only instantaneous localization was studied. Considering elementary systems of nonzero mass and spin 0 and \textonehalf{}, the following results were found. (a) As regards the localization problem, one cannot avoid accepting at least one of the following strong departures from the usual ideas: (i) Position has no meaning; (ii) it violates the physical equivalence of inertial frames; (iii) it is the only quantum variable which cannot be represented by an operator; (iv) it is non-Hermitian; (v) some unusual interaction effects do not disappear when the interaction is switched off. (b) If a component of position is to be precisely measurable as a point, then for spin 0 there is only one possible position operator; for spin \textonehalf{} the operator is unique up to a parameter; in both cases the operators are non-Hermitian with respect to the relativistically invariant scalar product, but in spite of this the eigenvalues of all components are real. The components of position are compatible with each other for spin 0 and incompatible for spin \textonehalf{}. The communication relations of position with linear momentum are the standard ones. The velocity operator, which is Hermitian, has the expected form. Several authors have stated that the localization problem can have a solution for mass greater than zero, but for the zero-mass case a solution does not exist. In this paper the localization problem is studied for zero-mass elementary systems by only imposing, as in Paper II, the above requirement of physical consistency. We consider systems with spin 0, \textonehalf{}, and 1. We prove that the consequences are essentially the same as those obtained for systems of mass greater than zero. The parameter is no longer arbitrary.
The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n
We find all spin operators for a Dirac particle satisfying the following very general conditions: (i) spin does not convert positive (negative) energy states into negative (positive) energy states, (ii) spin is a pseudovector, and (iii) eigenvalues of the projection of a spin operator in an arbitrary direction are independent of this direction (isotropy condition). We show that there are four such operators and all of them fulfill the standard su(2) Lie algebra commutation relations. Nevertheless, only one of them has a proper nonrelativistic limit and acts in the same way on negative and positive energy states. We show also that this operator is equivalent to the Newton-Wigner spin operator and Foldy-Wouthuysen mean-spin operator. We also discuss another operator proposed in the literature.
In parts II and III of the present series of papers, the localization problem was studied for the relativistic nonzero-mass (spin 0 and \textonehalf{}) and zero-mass (spin 0, \textonehalf{}, and 1) cases. With a set of postulates of which the basic one was the imposition of Lorentz invariance of localization (which is a self-consistency requirement), it was possible to define the position operator uniquely (except for a constant for spin \textonehalf{}, nonzero mass). However, the position operator has unusual properties, e.g., non-Hermiticity. This does not preclude its having physical meaning, but is such a strange result that in the present paper we test the validity of the postulates in the nonrelativistic case (spin 0 and \textonehalf{}) where the position operator is well known. We use the same set of postulates, except that here we impose the Galilean invariance of localization. The result of the test is positive; the position operator found is the usual one. Moreover, with our set of postulates, we restate the notion of localization in a more physical basis, giving a precise definition of it without imposing avoidable requirements.