Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics Letters

Dynamical models for state-vector reduction: do they ensure that measurements have outcomes?

Francesca Aicardi, A. Borsellino, G. C. Ghirardi, Renata Grassi

Published Apr 1, 1991• 104 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00666047

Related papers

Parameter dependence and outcome dependence in dynamical models for state vector reduction

G. C. Ghirardi, Renata Grassi, Jeremy Butterfield +1 more

Foundations of Physics•Mar 1, 1993•37 citations

Emergent measure-dependent probabilities from modified quantum dynamics without state-vector reduction

Michael B. Weissman

Counting outcomes is the obvious algorithm for generating probabilities in quantum mechanics without state-vector reduction (i.e. many-worlds). This procedure has usually been rejected because for purely linear dynamics it gives results in disagreement with experiment. Here it is shown that if non-linear decoherence effects (previously proposed by other authors) are combined with an exponential time dependence of the scale for the non-linear effects, the correct measure-dependent probabilities can emerge via outcome counting, without the addition of any stochastic fields or metaphysical hypotheses.

arXiv:quant-ph/9906127•Jun 30, 1999•1 citation

Reduction of the state vector: a proposed coincidence experiment

Artur Szczepański

•Jan 1, 1974•0 citations

Is There a Quantum Measurement Problem?

P. A. Moldauer

It is shown that the quantum-mechanical state vector correctly describes not only the probabilities for the outcomes of measurements, but also the correlations between the outcomes of successive measurements. In particular, von Neumann's axiom $M$ is shown to be redundant. Consequently, no extra---quantum-mechanical "reduction" of the joint object-apparatus state vector is required for a full statistical description of a sequence of measurements. It is also shown that any attempt to determine experimentally whether or not a reduction of the joint state vector has taken place during a measurement is incompatible with the preservation of the outcome of that measurement.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Feb 15, 1972•23 citations

Parameter dependence in dynamical models for statevector reduction

Jeremy Butterfield, Gordon N. Fleming, G. C. Ghirardi +1 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1993•19 citations

Dynamics of the Reduction of the Statevector

Philip Pearle

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1984•5 citations
Counting outcomes is the obvious algorithm for generating probabilities in quantum mechanics without state-vector reduction (i.e. many-worlds). This procedure has usually been rejected because for purely linear dynamics it gives results in disagreement with experiment. Here it is shown that if non-linear decoherence effects (previously proposed by other authors) are combined with an exponential time dependence of the scale for the non-linear effects, the correct measure-dependent probabilities can emerge via outcome counting, without the addition of any stochastic fields or metaphysical hypotheses.
It is shown that the quantum-mechanical state vector correctly describes not only the probabilities for the outcomes of measurements, but also the correlations between the outcomes of successive measurements. In particular, von Neumann's axiom MMM is shown to be redundant. Consequently, no extra---quantum-mechanical "reduction" of the joint object-apparatus state vector is required for a full statistical description of a sequence of measurements. It is also shown that any attempt to determine experimentally whether or not a reduction of the joint state vector has taken place during a measurement is incompatible with the preservation of the outcome of that measurement.