Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

A rigorous lower bound for the ground-state energy of the hydrogen atom

Yue Zhang

Published Jun 1, 1990• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Proving the existence of a lower bound on the energy of atoms is an important and noteworthy problem. Generally, people use the Heisenberg uncertainty relation to make their estimates. This article discusses the hydrogen atom and presents a new rigorous method for deriving the lower bound on the ground-state energy.
DOI
10.1119/1.16448

Related papers

On the stability of the hydrogen atom

G.W. Sauer, W Kuhn

Reference to the solution of the Schrodinger equation does not give much physical insight into the problem of stability because it is far from obvious how the conclusion follows from the equation. The common arguments derived from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle are not sufficient to establish the existence of a stable ground state. The proof for a lower bound of the hydrogen hamiltonian may be recast into physical terms by introducing an effective localisation potential.

European Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1982•1 citation

Rigorous Lower Bounds for Atomic and Ionic Ground-State Energies

Michael Hofacker

We establish a new iterative method for computing rigorous lower bounds for the ground-state energies of all atoms and ions. The accuracy of the resulting bounds depends on two ingredients: the quality of the initial energy estimate and the quality of the used upper bound for the maximum number of bound electrons, $N_c(Z)$, as a function of the nuclear charge $Z>0$. In particular, this new method allows us to establish the explicit lower bound $E(N,Z) \geq -0.8710\,N^{1/3}Z^2$ for the ground-state energy $E(N,Z)$ of the atom/ion with $N \in \mathbb{N}$ electrons and nuclear charge $Z \in (0,N]$, thereby considerably improving the best known constant $A=(3/2)^{1/3} \approx 1.1447$ in the estimate $E(N,Z) \geq -A\,N^{1/3}Z^2$ for $0 < Z \leq N$ and coming much closer to the best possible constant given by the Thomas-Fermi asymptotics $\lim_{N \to \infty} |E(N,N)|N^{-7/3}= -E_{\text{TF}}(1)\approx 0.7687$ derived in Adv. Math., 23(1) by Lieb and Simon. To demonstrate the potential and the limits of our method, we also compute explicit lower bounds for the ground-state energies $E(N,N)$ of all atoms with $2 \leq N \leq 86$ and we compare them with the bounds obtained in J. Chem. Phys., 62(8) by Hertel, Lieb, Thirring and the bounds obtained by Seco in his dissertation. Finally, we also provide a uniqueness result for the expectation values of the kinetic, potential and interaction energies on the ground-state space.

math-phCross-listedarXiv:2610.34480•Oct 27, 2026

Note on the bounds and approximations to the ground state energy of N-fermion systems derived from density matrix theory

F. David Peat

Certain lower bounds to the ground state energy of N-fermion systems have been derived in the literature using the properties of reduced density matrices.It is indicated that while some good approximations to the energy may be obtained by similar consideration the rigorous lower bound expressions lie too far below the exact energy to prove generally useful.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jan 15, 1970•4 citations

Why is the Solution of the Schrödinger Equation not a Miracle in Quantum Chemistry? A Perspective From the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Lieu Le Quang, Liviu Giurgiulescu, Khiem Tran Ngoc +1 more

The Schrödinger equation is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics and is used to determine the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. However, in the teaching of Quantum Chemistry, many students tend to regard the solutions of the Schrödinger equation as purely mathematical results without fully understanding the physical origin of quantum energy levels. In this paper, an approximate model of the hydrogen atom is first developed based on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Coulomb potential. This model is then used to derive the Bohr radius and the ground-state energy by minimizing the total energy function. Subsequently, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is formulated and solved by the method of separation of variables in spherical coordinates to obtain the exact energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom. The results demonstrate that both the approximate model and the exact solution predict the same ground-state energy, E1 = −13.6 eV, while the Schrödinger equation further generalizes this result to the quantized energy spectrum, En = −13.6/n2. These findings indicate that the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are not "miraculous" mathematical outcomes but rather the inevitable consequences of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. This approach provides a clearer physical interpretation of quantum energy levels and offers significant pedagogical value for the teaching of Quantum Chemistry.

Technical Education Science/Giáo dục Kỹ thuật•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations

On the application of the Heisenberg uncertainty relations to the hydrogen atom

Karen F Pagnoni, Alexys Bruno‐Alfonso, Roger A. Lewis

Abstract The Heisenberg uncertainty relations are cornerstones of quantum theory. Yet care is required in applying them. While they determine the lowest energy level in some systems, such as the isotropic three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, they fail to do so in other systems, notably, the hydrogen atom. This failure has been overlooked in many textbooks and pedagogic articles. The failure arises due to the singularity of the Coulomb potential. To elucidate the point, we present four subfamilies of position probability distributions. By delineating the limitations in applying position-momentum uncertainty to the hydrogen atom, we hope to improve the teaching and learning of modern physics.

European Journal of Physics•Jun 2, 2025•0 citations

Bohr’s Spectrum of Quantum States in the Atomic Hydrogen Deduced from the Uncertainty Principle for Energy and Time

Stanisław Olszewski

A modified uncertainty principle coupling the intervals of energy and time can lead to the shortest distance attained in course of the excitation process, as well as the shortest possible time interval for that process. These lower bounds are much similar to the interval limits deduced on both the experimental and theoretical footing in the era when the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has been developed. In effect of the bounds existence, a maximal nuclear charge Ze acceptable for the Bohr atomic ion could be calculated. In the next step the velocity of electron transitions between the Bohr orbits is found to be close to the speed of light. This result provides us with the energy spectrum of transitions similar to that obtained in the Bohr’s model. A momentary force acting on the electrons in course of their transitions is estimated to be by many orders larger than a steady electrostatic force existent between the atomic electron and the nucleus.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2014•6 citations
We establish a new iterative method for computing rigorous lower bounds for the ground-state energies of all atoms and ions. The accuracy of the resulting bounds depends on two ingredients: the quality of the initial energy estimate and the quality of the used upper bound for the maximum number of bound electrons, Nc(Z)N_c(Z)Nc​(Z), as a function of the nuclear charge Z>0Z>0Z>0. In particular, this new method allows us to establish the explicit lower bound E(N,Z)≥−0.8710 N1/3Z2E(N,Z) \geq -0.8710\,N^{1/3}Z^2E(N,Z)≥−0.8710N1/3Z2 for the ground-state energy E(N,Z)E(N,Z)E(N,Z) of the atom/ion with N∈NN \in \mathbb{N}N∈N electrons and nuclear charge Z∈(0,N]Z \in (0,N]Z∈(0,N], thereby considerably improving the best known constant A=(3/2)1/3≈1.1447A=(3/2)^{1/3} \approx 1.1447A=(3/2)1/3≈1.1447 in the estimate E(N,Z)≥−A N1/3Z2E(N,Z) \geq -A\,N^{1/3}Z^2E(N,Z)≥−AN1/3Z2 for 0<Z≤N0 < Z \leq N0<Z≤N and coming much closer to the best possible constant given by the Thomas-Fermi asymptotics lim⁡N→∞∣E(N,N)∣N−7/3=−ETF(1)≈0.7687\lim_{N \to \infty} |E(N,N)|N^{-7/3}= -E_{\text{TF}}(1)\approx 0.7687limN→∞​∣E(N,N)∣N−7/3=−ETF​(1)≈0.7687 derived in Adv. Math., 23(1) by Lieb and Simon. To demonstrate the potential and the limits of our method, we also compute explicit lower bounds for the ground-state energies E(N,N)E(N,N)E(N,N) of all atoms with 2≤N≤862 \leq N \leq 862≤N≤86 and we compare them with the bounds obtained in J. Chem. Phys., 62(8) by Hertel, Lieb, Thirring and the bounds obtained by Seco in his dissertation. Finally, we also provide a uniqueness result for the expectation values of the kinetic, potential and interaction energies on the ground-state space.
The Schrödinger equation is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics and is used to determine the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. However, in the teaching of Quantum Chemistry, many students tend to regard the solutions of the Schrödinger equation as purely mathematical results without fully understanding the physical origin of quantum energy levels. In this paper, an approximate model of the hydrogen atom is first developed based on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Coulomb potential. This model is then used to derive the Bohr radius and the ground-state energy by minimizing the total energy function. Subsequently, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is formulated and solved by the method of separation of variables in spherical coordinates to obtain the exact energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom. The results demonstrate that both the approximate model and the exact solution predict the same ground-state energy, E1 = −13.6 eV, while the Schrödinger equation further generalizes this result to the quantized energy spectrum, En = −13.6/n2. These findings indicate that the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are not "miraculous" mathematical outcomes but rather the inevitable consequences of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. This approach provides a clearer physical interpretation of quantum energy levels and offers significant pedagogical value for the teaching of Quantum Chemistry.
Abstract The Heisenberg uncertainty relations are cornerstones of quantum theory. Yet care is required in applying them. While they determine the lowest energy level in some systems, such as the isotropic three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, they fail to do so in other systems, notably, the hydrogen atom. This failure has been overlooked in many textbooks and pedagogic articles. The failure arises due to the singularity of the Coulomb potential. To elucidate the point, we present four subfamilies of position probability distributions. By delineating the limitations in applying position-momentum uncertainty to the hydrogen atom, we hope to improve the teaching and learning of modern physics.
A modified uncertainty principle coupling the intervals of energy and time can lead to the shortest distance attained in course of the excitation process, as well as the shortest possible time interval for that process. These lower bounds are much similar to the interval limits deduced on both the experimental and theoretical footing in the era when the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has been developed. In effect of the bounds existence, a maximal nuclear charge Ze acceptable for the Bohr atomic ion could be calculated. In the next step the velocity of electron transitions between the Bohr orbits is found to be close to the speed of light. This result provides us with the energy spectrum of transitions similar to that obtained in the Bohr’s model. A momentary force acting on the electrons in course of their transitions is estimated to be by many orders larger than a steady electrostatic force existent between the atomic electron and the nucleus.