Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Contemporary Physics

Does a flying electron spin?

B. M. Garraway, Stig Stenholm

Published May 1, 2002• 30 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In the late 1920s Niels Bohr propagated the idea that the magnetic moment of a free electron could not be observed. This derived from the idea that the spin degree of freedom characterized the electron only when it is bound in an atom. This view initiated a lively discussion, which involved many of the most prominent theoreticians of the time. The independent existence of the electron spin became an issue of principle. In particular it was deemed that quantum effects would destroy the separated classical trajectories in a Stern-- Gerlach type of experiment. We review these discussions and some later developments. Quantum effects do prove to be essential, but they do not overwhelm the magnetic effects of spin. In addition to these arguments, it has been possible experimentally to determine the electron g -factor with high accuracy in electromagnetic traps. In fact no principle seems to prevent the observation of the magnetic moment of the free electron.

DOI
10.1080/00107510110102119

Related papers

Stern-Gerlach Effect for Electron Beams

Herman Batelaan, T. J. Gay, J. J. Schwendiman

The conflict between Bohr's assertion that the magnetic moment of the electron cannot be measured with experiments based on the concept of classical trajectories, and the measurement of the magnetic moment of electrons in a modified Penning trap by Dehmelt et al. has led us to reevaluate other implications of Bohr's assertion. We show that, contrary to the analysis of Bohr and Pauli, the assumption of classical trajectories in a Stern-Gerlach--like device can result in a high degree of spin separation for an electron beam. This effect may persist within a fully quantum-mechanical analysis. The magnetic fields considered are such that a tabletop Stern-Gerlach electron spin filter is feasible.

Physical Review Letters•Dec 8, 1997•82 citations

Transient effects on electron spin observation

Jonas Larson, B. M. Garraway, Stig Stenholm

In an earlier publication we addressed the problem of splitting an electron beam in the Stern-Gerlach experiment. In contrast to arguments put forward in the early days of quantum theory, we concluded that there are no issues of principle preventing the observation of electron spin during free flight. In that paper, however, we considered only a sudden switch off of the separating magnetic field. In this work we consider the possible effects of finite switching times at the beginning and the end of the interaction period. We consider a model where the coupling between the electron and the field is time dependent. As a result of the time dependence, the field also acquires an electric component, but this seems to cause no significant change of our conclusions. On the other hand, the smooth change of the interaction enforces the same longitudinal velocity on the electron both at the beginning and end of the interaction period because of conservation laws; this effect was missing in our earlier calculations. As the electrons are supposed to travel as a beam, this feature helps by restoring the beam quality after the interaction.

Physical Review A•Mar 12, 2004•3 citations

Observing the spin of free electrons in action(Stern-Gerlach experiment by free electrons)

Hosein Majlesi

Stern-Gerlach experiment by free electron is very important experiment because it answered some questions that remain unanswered for almost a century. Bohr and Pauli considered its objective observation as impossible while some other scientists considered such observation as possible. The experiment on free electrons has not been conducted so far because the high magnetic field gradient predicted there was thought as impossible to generate. This paper proves that it is not only possible but also observable using a high vacuum lamp which is deionized well. To obtain a high magnetic field gradient, it is not necessary to have a very strong magnetic field and it is possible to observe the phenomenon using a very sharp pointed magnet and adjusting the voltage in a certain distance from free electron beams. that objective observation requires your consideration of some technical points simultaneously.In this experiment, no electric field and no magnetic field does not change with time.

arXiv:1504.07963•Apr 29, 2015•0 citations

Motion of a Dipole-Quadrupole System

Ralph Schiller

Niels Bohr showed that the magnetic moment of an electron cannot be determined by a Stern-Gerlach experiment. His argument is extended to other moments, and general conditions are stated as to when a moment determination is feasible by such an experiment. In addition, the expectation-value equations are given for a stationary, gyrating, nonrelativistic, spin-1 particle in arbitrary, but classical, external electro-magnetic fields. For such a dipole-quadrupole system there is no distinction between the classical and quantal descriptions. Of interest is the fact that $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ is the invariance group of the motion. The theory is extended to the relativistic domain by Lorentz transformation. The group $\mathrm{SU}(3,1)$ appears as the invariance group of the internal motion.

Physical Review•May 25, 1968•4 citations

From the Single Electron to Spin

Plinio Innocenzi

The nature of the electron, a point particle according to the Standard Model, presents a paradox that challenges our ability to comprehend the physical reality. This paradox lies in the apparent contradiction between the complexity represented according to mathematical models that fully describe experimental results and the world around us perceived as a representation of an intuitive process. For example, how come all electrons are the same? As we shall see in this chapter, a seemingly simple question stimulated original reflections that later led to significant theoretical developments. Stern and Gerlach’s experiments demonstrated that the electron possesses an intrinsic property, the spin, whose generalization led to the distinction between fermions and bosons. The spin property, however, is apparently not reconcilable with the point properties of the electron. It has, in fact, not any analogue in classical physics. This incongruence also applies to the electron’s magnetic dipole moment. The key to everything is perhaps the spin property, which has Pauli’s Exclusion Principle as its consequence, to which we owe the existence of matter as we perceive it.

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Tests for Bohr and Pauli

In 1932 Pauli and Bohr declared that electromagnetic fields cannot be used to separate electrons according to their spin. A Stern–Gerlach magnet can split atomic beams into beams with different polarizations, but the Lorentz force blurs the splitting for charged particles such as electrons. Brillouin suggested that electrons could be separated by applying magnetic gradients along the electron beam, but Pauli disagreed. He wrote in 1958: "It is impossible to observe the spin of the electron, separated fully from its orbital momentum, by means of experiments based on the concept of classical particle trajectories."

Physics World•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations
In the late 1920s Niels Bohr propagated the idea that the magnetic moment of a free electron could not be observed. This derived from the idea that the spin degree of freedom characterized the electron only when it is bound in an atom. This view initiated a lively discussion, which involved many of the most prominent theoreticians of the time. The independent existence of the electron spin became an issue of principle. In particular it was deemed that quantum effects would destroy the separated classical trajectories in a Stern-- Gerlach type of experiment. We review these discussions and some later developments. Quantum effects do prove to be essential, but they do not overwhelm the magnetic effects of spin. In addition to these arguments, it has been possible experimentally to determine the electron g -factor with high accuracy in electromagnetic traps. In fact no principle seems to prevent the observation of the magnetic moment of the free electron.
The conflict between Bohr's assertion that the magnetic moment of the electron cannot be measured with experiments based on the concept of classical trajectories, and the measurement of the magnetic moment of electrons in a modified Penning trap by Dehmelt et al. has led us to reevaluate other implications of Bohr's assertion. We show that, contrary to the analysis of Bohr and Pauli, the assumption of classical trajectories in a Stern-Gerlach--like device can result in a high degree of spin separation for an electron beam. This effect may persist within a fully quantum-mechanical analysis. The magnetic fields considered are such that a tabletop Stern-Gerlach electron spin filter is feasible.
In an earlier publication we addressed the problem of splitting an electron beam in the Stern-Gerlach experiment. In contrast to arguments put forward in the early days of quantum theory, we concluded that there are no issues of principle preventing the observation of electron spin during free flight. In that paper, however, we considered only a sudden switch off of the separating magnetic field. In this work we consider the possible effects of finite switching times at the beginning and the end of the interaction period. We consider a model where the coupling between the electron and the field is time dependent. As a result of the time dependence, the field also acquires an electric component, but this seems to cause no significant change of our conclusions. On the other hand, the smooth change of the interaction enforces the same longitudinal velocity on the electron both at the beginning and end of the interaction period because of conservation laws; this effect was missing in our earlier calculations. As the electrons are supposed to travel as a beam, this feature helps by restoring the beam quality after the interaction.
Stern-Gerlach experiment by free electron is very important experiment because it answered some questions that remain unanswered for almost a century. Bohr and Pauli considered its objective observation as impossible while some other scientists considered such observation as possible. The experiment on free electrons has not been conducted so far because the high magnetic field gradient predicted there was thought as impossible to generate. This paper proves that it is not only possible but also observable using a high vacuum lamp which is deionized well. To obtain a high magnetic field gradient, it is not necessary to have a very strong magnetic field and it is possible to observe the phenomenon using a very sharp pointed magnet and adjusting the voltage in a certain distance from free electron beams. that objective observation requires your consideration of some technical points simultaneously.In this experiment, no electric field and no magnetic field does not change with time.
Niels Bohr showed that the magnetic moment of an electron cannot be determined by a Stern-Gerlach experiment. His argument is extended to other moments, and general conditions are stated as to when a moment determination is feasible by such an experiment. In addition, the expectation-value equations are given for a stationary, gyrating, nonrelativistic, spin-1 particle in arbitrary, but classical, external electro-magnetic fields. For such a dipole-quadrupole system there is no distinction between the classical and quantal descriptions. Of interest is the fact that SU(3)\mathrm{SU}(3)SU(3) is the invariance group of the motion. The theory is extended to the relativistic domain by Lorentz transformation. The group SU(3,1)\mathrm{SU}(3,1)SU(3,1) appears as the invariance group of the internal motion.
The nature of the electron, a point particle according to the Standard Model, presents a paradox that challenges our ability to comprehend the physical reality. This paradox lies in the apparent contradiction between the complexity represented according to mathematical models that fully describe experimental results and the world around us perceived as a representation of an intuitive process. For example, how come all electrons are the same? As we shall see in this chapter, a seemingly simple question stimulated original reflections that later led to significant theoretical developments. Stern and Gerlach’s experiments demonstrated that the electron possesses an intrinsic property, the spin, whose generalization led to the distinction between fermions and bosons. The spin property, however, is apparently not reconcilable with the point properties of the electron. It has, in fact, not any analogue in classical physics. This incongruence also applies to the electron’s magnetic dipole moment. The key to everything is perhaps the spin property, which has Pauli’s Exclusion Principle as its consequence, to which we owe the existence of matter as we perceive it.
In 1932 Pauli and Bohr declared that electromagnetic fields cannot be used to separate electrons according to their spin. A Stern–Gerlach magnet can split atomic beams into beams with different polarizations, but the Lorentz force blurs the splitting for charged particles such as electrons. Brillouin suggested that electrons could be separated by applying magnetic gradients along the electron beam, but Pauli disagreed. He wrote in 1958: "It is impossible to observe the spin of the electron, separated fully from its orbital momentum, by means of experiments based on the concept of classical particle trajectories."