Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Letters A

Why quantum mechanics is incompatible with Einstein locality

F. Selleri, Gino Tarozzi

Published Dec 1, 1986• 12 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9601(86)90423-8

Related papers

Einstein and non-locality in the quantum theory

David Böhm, Basil J. Hiley

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1980•0 citations

Is quantum mechanics with CP nonconservation incompatible with Einstein's locality condition at the statistical level?

Amitava Datta, Dipankar Home, Amitava Raychaudhuri

Physics Letters A•Jul 1, 1988•17 citations

TESTABLE INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN EINSTEIN'S LOCALITY CONDITION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS WITH CP VIOLATION

Amitava Datta, Amitava Raychaudhuri, Dipankar Home

Contributed to•Jan 1, 1986•0 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and Bell’s inequalities

Jan Schütz

Considering the Gedankenexperiment of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen as example the nonlocal character of quantum mechanics is discussed. The attempt to complement quantum mechanics by a supplementary, local causal theory of ’hidden-variables’ and the fundamental incompatibility of both theories due to Bell’s inequalities is shown. Some experiments clearly favouring quantum mechanics are outlined.

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Real and/or Local

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

Abstract Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) argued that quantum mechanics was incomplete. We consider their argument and the physical and philosophical intuitions that motivated it. Among their intuitions was a commitment to real physical properties and to local properties and interactions. For his part, Einstein’s commitment to locality was closely related to how he understood special relativity. We show why the standard collapse formulation of quantum mechanics is flatly incompatible with special relativity. Following Bell, we then see why no physical theory that satisfies EPR’s commonsense and philosophical intuitions can be empirically adequate over quantum phenomena.

•Dec 26, 2019•0 citations

Einstein Locality and the Quantum Mechanical Long-Distance Effects

F. Selleri

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1980•4 citations
Abstract Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) argued that quantum mechanics was incomplete. We consider their argument and the physical and philosophical intuitions that motivated it. Among their intuitions was a commitment to real physical properties and to local properties and interactions. For his part, Einstein’s commitment to locality was closely related to how he understood special relativity. We show why the standard collapse formulation of quantum mechanics is flatly incompatible with special relativity. Following Bell, we then see why no physical theory that satisfies EPR’s commonsense and philosophical intuitions can be empirically adequate over quantum phenomena.