Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Brazilian Journal of Physics

Intrinsic time-uncertainties and decoherence: comparison of 4 models

Lajos Diósi

Published Jun 1, 2005• 70 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Four models of energy decoherence are discussed from the common perspective of intrinsic time-uncertainty. The four authors - Milburn, Adler, Penrose, and myself - have four different approaches. The present work concentrates on their common divisors at the level of the proposed equations rather than at the level of the interpretations. General relationships between time-uncertainty and energy-decoherence are presented in both global and local sense. Global and local master equations are derived. (The local concept is favored.)

DOI
10.1590/s0103-97332005000200009

Related papers

Intrinsic time-uncertainties and decoherence: comparison of 4 models

Lajos Diósi

Four models of energy decoherence are discussed from the common perspective of intrinsic time-uncertainty. The four authors -- Milburn, Adler, Penrose, and myself -- have four different approaches. The present work concentrates on their common divisors at the level of the proposed equations rather than at the level of the interpretations. General relationships between time-uncertainty and energy-decoherence are presented in both global and local sense. Global and local master equations are derived. (The local concept is favored.)

arXiv:quant-ph/0412154•Dec 20, 2004•5 citations

Implications of the intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics to nonequilibrium statistical mechanics

A. K. Rajagopal

The discrete-time jump model for intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics proposed recently by Milburn is here generalized to explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonians. In this model, a time-dependent entropy is obtained and thus it admits of an interpretation that this is a model for an open system. Unlike in the Milburn model, we introduce a minimum uncertainty phase change dictated by the minimum ``time-energy uncertainty product'' to define the shortest time scale in the system. Implications of this model to quantum nanometric devices such as quantum dots or resonant tunneling devices are indicated. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1996•5 citations

Intrinsic and fundamental decoherence: issues and problems

Charis Anastopoulos, B. L. Hu

We investigate the meaning of gravity-induced decoherence in quantum theory, known as ‘intrinsic’ or ‘fundamental’ decoherence in the literature. We explore a range of issues relevant to this problem, including the meaning of modified uncertainty relations, the interpretations of the Planck scale, the distinction between quantum and stochastic fluctuations and the role of the time variable in quantum mechanics. We examine the specific physical assumptions that enter into different approaches to the subject. In particular, we critique two representative approaches that identify time fluctuations as the origin of intrinsic or fundamental decoherence: one that models the fluctuations by stochastic process and one that purports to derive decoherence from the quantum fluctuations of real clocks.

arXiv:0803.3447•Classical and Quantum Gravity•Jul 22, 2008•37 citations

Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics

Gerard J Milburn

A model for intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics is proposed, based on a simple modification of unitary Schr\"odinger evolution. On sufficiently small time scales the system evolves by a random sequence of unitary phase changes generated by the Hamiltonian. The Schr\"odinger equation is obtained to zeroth order in the expansion parameter. Higher-order corrections lead to a loss of coherence in the energy basis. The rate of coherence loss becomes very large as the energy scale of the system is increased. The expansion parameter determines an uncertainty in the time step on very short times scales. A number of testable consequences are derived including anomalous dispersion of a free particle, decay of oscillatory systems, destruction of interference-fringe visibility, and a phase shift of interference fringes.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1991•524 citations

On the time-energy uncertainty relation

Dror Shalitin

The time-energy uncertainty relation is reviewed and discussed from some elementary aspects. The relation is confirmed for a metastable system by a direct estimate of the uncertainties.

American Journal of Physics•Dec 1, 1984•2 citations

1 The Time–Energy Uncertainty Relation

Paul Busch

The time energy uncertainty relation has been a controversial issue since the advent of quantum theory, with respect to appropriate formalisation, validity and possible meanings. A comprehensive account of the development of this subject up to the 1980s is provided by a combination of the reviews of Jammer (1974), Bauer and Mello (1978), and Busch (1990). More recent reviews are concerned with different specific aspects of the subject. The purpose of this chapter is to show that different types of time energy uncertainty relation can indeed be deduced in specific contexts, but that there is no unique universal relation that could stand on equal footing with the position-momentum uncertainty relation. To this end, we will survey the various formulations of a time energy uncertainty relation, with a brief assessment of their validity, and along the way we will indicate some new developments that emerged since the 1990s.

•May 11, 2001•77 citations
Four models of energy decoherence are discussed from the common perspective of intrinsic time-uncertainty. The four authors - Milburn, Adler, Penrose, and myself - have four different approaches. The present work concentrates on their common divisors at the level of the proposed equations rather than at the level of the interpretations. General relationships between time-uncertainty and energy-decoherence are presented in both global and local sense. Global and local master equations are derived. (The local concept is favored.)
Four models of energy decoherence are discussed from the common perspective of intrinsic time-uncertainty. The four authors -- Milburn, Adler, Penrose, and myself -- have four different approaches. The present work concentrates on their common divisors at the level of the proposed equations rather than at the level of the interpretations. General relationships between time-uncertainty and energy-decoherence are presented in both global and local sense. Global and local master equations are derived. (The local concept is favored.)
The discrete-time jump model for intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics proposed recently by Milburn is here generalized to explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonians. In this model, a time-dependent entropy is obtained and thus it admits of an interpretation that this is a model for an open system. Unlike in the Milburn model, we introduce a minimum uncertainty phase change dictated by the minimum ``time-energy uncertainty product'' to define the shortest time scale in the system. Implications of this model to quantum nanometric devices such as quantum dots or resonant tunneling devices are indicated. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
We investigate the meaning of gravity-induced decoherence in quantum theory, known as ‘intrinsic’ or ‘fundamental’ decoherence in the literature. We explore a range of issues relevant to this problem, including the meaning of modified uncertainty relations, the interpretations of the Planck scale, the distinction between quantum and stochastic fluctuations and the role of the time variable in quantum mechanics. We examine the specific physical assumptions that enter into different approaches to the subject. In particular, we critique two representative approaches that identify time fluctuations as the origin of intrinsic or fundamental decoherence: one that models the fluctuations by stochastic process and one that purports to derive decoherence from the quantum fluctuations of real clocks.
A model for intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics is proposed, based on a simple modification of unitary Schr\"odinger evolution. On sufficiently small time scales the system evolves by a random sequence of unitary phase changes generated by the Hamiltonian. The Schr\"odinger equation is obtained to zeroth order in the expansion parameter. Higher-order corrections lead to a loss of coherence in the energy basis. The rate of coherence loss becomes very large as the energy scale of the system is increased. The expansion parameter determines an uncertainty in the time step on very short times scales. A number of testable consequences are derived including anomalous dispersion of a free particle, decay of oscillatory systems, destruction of interference-fringe visibility, and a phase shift of interference fringes.
The time energy uncertainty relation has been a controversial issue since the advent of quantum theory, with respect to appropriate formalisation, validity and possible meanings. A comprehensive account of the development of this subject up to the 1980s is provided by a combination of the reviews of Jammer (1974), Bauer and Mello (1978), and Busch (1990). More recent reviews are concerned with different specific aspects of the subject. The purpose of this chapter is to show that different types of time energy uncertainty relation can indeed be deduced in specific contexts, but that there is no unique universal relation that could stand on equal footing with the position-momentum uncertainty relation. To this end, we will survey the various formulations of a time energy uncertainty relation, with a brief assessment of their validity, and along the way we will indicate some new developments that emerged since the 1990s.