Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physica B Condensed Matter

Phase diagram of the two-dimensional extended Hubbard model: pairing from charge and spin fluctuations

Seiichiro Onari, Ryotaro Arita, Kazuhiko Kuroki, Hideo Aoki

Published Feb 11, 2005• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.physb.2005.01.133

Related papers

Phase diagram of the two-dimensional extended Hubbard model: Phase transitions between different pairing symmetries when charge and spin fluctuations coexist

Seiichiro Onari, Ryotaro Arita, Kazuhiko Kuroki +1 more

In order to explore how superconductivity arises when charge fluctuations and spin fluctuations coexist, we have obtained a phase diagram against the off-site repulsion $V$ and band filling $n$ for the extended, repulsive Hubbard model on the square lattice with the fluctuation exchange approximation. We have found the existence of (i) a transition between ${d}_{xy}$ and ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ pairing symmetries, (ii) $f$-pairing in between the ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ and CDW phases for intermediate $0.5<n<1.0$ and large $V$, and (iii) for anisotropic cases the pairing symmetry changing, in agreement with a previously proposed ``generic phase diagram,'' as $d\ensuremath{\rightarrow}f\ensuremath{\rightarrow}s$ when $V$ (hence the charge fluctuations) are increased. All these are consequences of the structure in the charge and spin susceptibilities, which have peaks habitating at common or segregated positions in $k$ space.

arXiv:cond-mat/0312314•Physical Review B•Sep 30, 2004•93 citations

Spin and charge fluctuations of the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Yasushi Shiina

Abstracts of the meeting of the Physical Society of Japan. Sectional meeting•Sep 12, 1995•0 citations

Revisiting superconductivity in the extended one-band Hubbard model: Pairing via spin and charge fluctuations

Mercè Roig, Astrid Tranum Rømer, P. J. Hirschfeld +1 more

The leading superconducting instabilities of the two-dimensional extended repulsive one-band Hubbard model within spin-fluctuation pairing theory depend sensitively on electron density, band, and interaction parameters. We map out the phase diagrams within a random-phase-approximation spin- and charge-fluctuation approach, and find that while ${B}_{1g}$ (${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$) and ${B}_{2g}$ (${d}_{xy}$) pairing dominates in the absence of repulsive longer-range Coulomb interactions ${V}_{\mathrm{NN}}$, the latter induces pairing in other symmetry channels, including, e.g., ${A}_{2g}$ ($g$-wave), nodal ${A}_{1g}$ (extended $s$-wave), or nodal ${E}_{u}$ ($p$-wave) spin-triplet superconductivity. At the lowest temperatures, transition boundaries in the phase diagrams between symmetry-distinct spin-singlet orders generate complex time-reversal symmetry broken superpositions. By contrast, we find that boundaries between singlet and triplet regions are characterized by first-order transitions. Finally, motivated by recent photoemission experiments, we have determined the influence of an additional explicitly attractive nearest-neighbor interaction, ${V}_{\mathrm{NN}}<0$, on the superconducting gap structure. Depending on the electronic filling, such an attraction boosts ${E}_{u}$ ($p$-wave) spin-triplet or ${B}_{1g}$ (${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$) spin-singlet ordering.

arXiv:2211.07423•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Dec 30, 2022•16 citations

Phase diagram of the extended hubbard model with pair hopping interaction

G.I. Japaridze, S. Sarkar

arXiv:cond-mat/0202420•The European Physical Journal B•Jul 1, 2002•25 citations

The Phase Diagram of the One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model

H. Q. Lin, Eduardo R. Gagliano, David K Campbell +2 more

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1995•6 citations

Evolution of the superconductivity dome in the two-dimensional Hubbard model

K.-S. Chen, Zi Yang Meng, Shuxiang Yang +3 more

In a recent publication [Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, 165136 (2012)], we identified a line of Lifshitz transition points separating the Fermi liquid and pseudogap regions in the hole-doped two-dimensional Hubbard model. Here, we extend the study to further determine the superconducting transition temperature in the phase diagram. By means of large-scale dynamical cluster quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we are able to identify the evolution of the $d$-wave superconducting dome in the hole-dope side of the phase diagram, with next-nearest-neighbor hopping (${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$), chemical potential, and temperature as control parameters. To obtain the superconducting transition temperature ${T}_{c}$, we employ two-particle measurements of the pairing susceptibilities. As ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ goes from positive to negative values, we find the $d$-wave projected irreducible pairing vertex function is enhanced, and the curvature of its doping dependence changes from convex to concave, which fixes the position of the maximum superconducting temperature at the same filling ($n\ensuremath{\approx}0.85$) and constraints the dome from precisely following the Lifshitz line. We furthermore decompose the irreducible vertex function into fully irreducible, charge and spin components via the parquet equations, and consistently find that the spin component dominates the pairing vertex function in the doping range where the dome is located. Our investigations deepen the understanding of the phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model and, more importantly, pose new questions to the field. For example, we found as ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ goes from positive to negative values, the curvature of the pairing strength as a function of doping changes from convex to concave, and the nature of the dominant fluctuations changes from charge degree of freedom to spin degree of freedom. The study of these issues will lead to further understanding of the phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model and also the physics of the hole-doped cuprate high-temperature superconductors.

arXiv:1308.5946•Physical Review B•Dec 10, 2013•33 citations
In order to explore how superconductivity arises when charge fluctuations and spin fluctuations coexist, we have obtained a phase diagram against the off-site repulsion VVV and band filling nnn for the extended, repulsive Hubbard model on the square lattice with the fluctuation exchange approximation. We have found the existence of (i) a transition between dxy{d}_{xy}dxy​ and ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ pairing symmetries, (ii) fff-pairing in between the ${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ and CDW phases for intermediate 0.5<n<1.00.5<n<1.00.5<n<1.0 and large VVV, and (iii) for anisotropic cases the pairing symmetry changing, in agreement with a previously proposed ``generic phase diagram,'' as $d\ensuremath{\rightarrow}f\ensuremath{\rightarrow}s$ when VVV (hence the charge fluctuations) are increased. All these are consequences of the structure in the charge and spin susceptibilities, which have peaks habitating at common or segregated positions in kkk space.
The leading superconducting instabilities of the two-dimensional extended repulsive one-band Hubbard model within spin-fluctuation pairing theory depend sensitively on electron density, band, and interaction parameters. We map out the phase diagrams within a random-phase-approximation spin- and charge-fluctuation approach, and find that while B1g{B}_{1g}B1g​ (${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$) and B2g{B}_{2g}B2g​ (dxy{d}_{xy}dxy​) pairing dominates in the absence of repulsive longer-range Coulomb interactions VNN{V}_{\mathrm{NN}}VNN​, the latter induces pairing in other symmetry channels, including, e.g., A2g{A}_{2g}A2g​ (ggg-wave), nodal A1g{A}_{1g}A1g​ (extended sss-wave), or nodal Eu{E}_{u}Eu​ (ppp-wave) spin-triplet superconductivity. At the lowest temperatures, transition boundaries in the phase diagrams between symmetry-distinct spin-singlet orders generate complex time-reversal symmetry broken superpositions. By contrast, we find that boundaries between singlet and triplet regions are characterized by first-order transitions. Finally, motivated by recent photoemission experiments, we have determined the influence of an additional explicitly attractive nearest-neighbor interaction, VNN<0{V}_{\mathrm{NN}}<0VNN​<0, on the superconducting gap structure. Depending on the electronic filling, such an attraction boosts Eu{E}_{u}Eu​ (ppp-wave) spin-triplet or B1g{B}_{1g}B1g​ (${d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$) spin-singlet ordering.
In a recent publication [Chen et al., Phys. Rev. B 86, 165136 (2012)], we identified a line of Lifshitz transition points separating the Fermi liquid and pseudogap regions in the hole-doped two-dimensional Hubbard model. Here, we extend the study to further determine the superconducting transition temperature in the phase diagram. By means of large-scale dynamical cluster quantum Monte Carlo simulations, we are able to identify the evolution of the ddd-wave superconducting dome in the hole-dope side of the phase diagram, with next-nearest-neighbor hopping (${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$), chemical potential, and temperature as control parameters. To obtain the superconducting transition temperature Tc{T}_{c}Tc​, we employ two-particle measurements of the pairing susceptibilities. As ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ goes from positive to negative values, we find the ddd-wave projected irreducible pairing vertex function is enhanced, and the curvature of its doping dependence changes from convex to concave, which fixes the position of the maximum superconducting temperature at the same filling ($n\ensuremath{\approx}0.85$) and constraints the dome from precisely following the Lifshitz line. We furthermore decompose the irreducible vertex function into fully irreducible, charge and spin components via the parquet equations, and consistently find that the spin component dominates the pairing vertex function in the doping range where the dome is located. Our investigations deepen the understanding of the phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model and, more importantly, pose new questions to the field. For example, we found as ${t}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ goes from positive to negative values, the curvature of the pairing strength as a function of doping changes from convex to concave, and the nature of the dominant fluctuations changes from charge degree of freedom to spin degree of freedom. The study of these issues will lead to further understanding of the phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model and also the physics of the hole-doped cuprate high-temperature superconductors.