A unified approach to Aharonov-Bohm, Aharonov-Casher and which-path experiments is presented, using an enlarged Hilbert space. This Hilbert space contains quasi-periodic Aharonov-Bohm wavefunctions R ( x +2 ) = R ( x )exp(i ) with various values of . Thus it can describe which-path Aharonov-Bohm experiments where the phase is uncertain due to decoherence that occurs as a result of the observation of the paths of the electric charges. The same Hilbert space contains quasi-periodic Aharonov-Casher wavefunctions which describe magnetic flux tubes winding around an electric charge and which are related through a Fourier transform to the Aharonov-Bohm wavefunctions. The duality between these two phenomena is discussed. The decoherence occuring in which-path experiments is studied quantitatively. Magnetic and electric superselection rules, appropriate for the Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher experiments correspondingly, are also discussed.
A unified approach to Aharonov-Bohm, Aharonov-Casher and which-path experiments is presented, using an enlarged Hilbert space. This Hilbert space contains quasi-periodic Aharonov-Bohm wavefunctions R ( x +2 ) = R ( x )exp(i ) with various values of . Thus it can describe which-path Aharonov-Bohm experiments where the phase is uncertain due to decoherence that occurs as a result of the observation of the paths of the electric charges. The same Hilbert space contains quasi-periodic Aharonov-Casher wavefunctions which describe magnetic flux tubes winding around an electric charge and which are related through a Fourier transform to the Aharonov-Bohm wavefunctions. The duality between these two phenomena is discussed. The decoherence occuring in which-path experiments is studied quantitatively. Magnetic and electric superselection rules, appropriate for the Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher experiments correspondingly, are also discussed.
In 1984, 25 years after the prediction of the →Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, Aharonov and Casher [1] predicted a “dual ” effect. In both effects, a particle is excluded from a tubular region of space, but otherwise no force acts on it. Yet it acquires a measurable quantum phase that depends on what is inside the tube of space from which it is excluded. In the AB effect, the particle is charged and the tube contains a magnetic flux. In the Aharonov-Casher (AC) effect, the particle is neutral, but has a magnetic moment, and the tube contains a line of charge. Experiments in neutron [2], vortex [3], atom [4], and electron [5] interferometry bear out the prediction of Aharonov and Casher. Here we briefly explain the logic of the AC effect and how it is dual to the AB effect. We begin with a two-dimensional version of the AB effect. Figure 1 shows an electron moving in a plane, and also a “fluxon”, i.e. a small region of magnetic flux (pointing out of the plane) from which the electron is excluded. In Fig. 1 the fluxon is in a quantum superposition of two positions, and the electron diffracts around one of the positions but not the other. Initially, the fluxon and electron are in a
We establish systematic consolidation of the Aharonov–Bohm (AB) and Aharonov–Casher effects including their scalar counterparts. Their formal correspondences in acquiring topological phases are revealed on the basis of the gauge symmetry in non-simply-connected spaces and the adiabatic condition for the state of magnetic dipoles. In addition, investigation of basic two-body interactions between an electric charge and a magnetic dipole clarifies their appropriate relative motions and discloses physical interrelations between the effects. Based on the two-body interaction, we also construct an exact microscopic description of the AB effect, where all the elements are treated on equal footing, i.e., magnetic dipoles are described quantum-mechanically and electromagnetic fields are quantized. This microscopic analysis not only confirms the conventional (semiclassical) results and the topological nature but also allows one to explore the fluctuation effects due to the precession of the magnetic dipoles with the adiabatic condition relaxed.
We consider a particle in a coherent superposition of states with different electric charges moving in the vicinity of a magnetic flux. Formally, it should acquire a (gauge-dependent) Aharonov–Bohm (AB) relative phase between the charge states, even for an incomplete loop. If measurable, such a geometric, rather than topological, AB phase would seem to break gauge invariance. Wick, Wightman and Wigner argued that since (global) charge-dependent phase transformations are physically unobservable, charge state superpositions are unphysical (‘charge superselection rule’). This would resolve the apparent paradox in a trivial way. However, Aharonov and Susskind disputed this superselection rule: they distinguished between such global charge-dependent transformations and transformations of the relative inter-charge phases of two particles, and showed that the latter could in principle be observable! Finally, the paradox again disappears once we consider the ‘calibration’ of the phase measured by the Aharonov–Susskind phase detectors, as well as the phase of the particle at its initial point. It turns out that such a detector can only distinguish between the relative phases of two paths if their (oriented) difference forms a loop around the flux.
We briefly review the theoretical formulations and applications of the Aharonov--Bohm effect and the Aharonov--Casher effect with emphasis on mesoscopic physics. Topics relating to the Aharonov--Bohm effect include: locality, periodicity, non-integrable phase factors, Abelian gauge theory, interference, the spectrum and persistent current of electrons on a ring pierced by a magnetic field, Onsager reciprocity relations, and Aharonov--Bohm interferometer. Topics relating to the Aharonov--Casher effect include: a magnetic dipole in an electric field, locality, periodicity, non-Abelian gauge invariance, SU(2) non-integrable phase factors, spin-orbit coupling, Pauli equation, Rashba Hamiltonian, Aharonov--Casher interferometer, conductance and polarization in two-channel systems due to the Aharonov--Casher effect.
Recent works showed that the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) phase difference for a quantum charged particle can be written in terms of electric and magnetic fluxes in a space-time surface whose boundaries are the possible particle worldlines in the interferometer, relative to the possible paths. After presenting this result in a more detailed way, reinforcing its topological nature, we study the magnetic and electric versions of the AB effect in different inertial reference frames. We find a particular reference frame for a magnetic AB effect where the magnetic flux has a null contribution for the AB phase difference, which is entirely due to an electric flux. Also, we find a particular reference frame for an electric AB effect where the electric flux has a null contribution for the AB phase difference, which is entirely due to a magnetic flux. In this sense, the nomenclatures magnetic AB effect and electric AB effect lose their meaning. We have electromagnetic AB effects.