We analyze a superconducting charge qubit that is dispersively coupled to an electric resonator. The system is connected to a transmission line that allows a reflection measurement. In this paper we derive the equations of motion of the system by using the quantum network theory. We assume that the measurement signal is so strong that the resonator behaves classically. The time evolution of the qubit is calculated with the Bloch equations. We have simulated the system in the adiabatic eigenbasis of the qubit to bring out the effects of the changing band curvatures under strong driving. We use circuit theory to calculate the energy flow in different parts of the circuit.
We analyze a superconducting charge qubit that is dispersively coupled to an electric resonator. The system is connected to a transmission line that allows a reflection measurement. In this paper we derive the equations of motion of the system by using the quantum network theory. We assume that the measurement signal is so strong that the resonator behaves classically. The time evolution of the qubit is calculated with the Bloch equations. We have simulated the system in the adiabatic eigenbasis of the qubit to bring out the effects of the changing band curvatures under strong driving. We use circuit theory to calculate the energy flow in different parts of the circuit.
We analyze the dynamics of a qubit-resonator system coupled with a thermal bath and external electromagnetic fields. Using the evolution equations for the set of Heisenberg operators that describe the whole system, we derive an expression for the resonator field, that includes the resonator-drive, the resonator-bath, and resonator-qubit interactions. The renormalization of the resonator frequency, caused by the qubit-resonator interaction, is accounted for. Using the solutions for the resonator field, we derive the equation that describes the qubit dynamics. The dependence of the qubit evolution during the measurement time on the fidelity of a single-shot measurement is studied. The relation between the fidelity and measurement time is shown explicitly. We proposed a novel adiabatic method for the phase qubit measurement. The method utilizes a low-frequency, quasi-classical resonator inductively coupled to the qubit. The resonator modulates the qubit energy, and the back reaction of the qubit causes a shift in the phase of the resonator. The resonator phase shift can be used to determine the qubit state. We have simulated this measurement taking into the account the energy levels outside the phase qubit manifold. We have shown that, for qubit frequencies in the range of 8-12GHZ, a resonator frequency of 500 MHz and a measurement time of 100 ns, the phase difference between the two qubit states is greater than 0.2 rad. This phase difference exceeds the measurement uncertainty, and can be detected using a classical phase-meter. A fidelity of 0.9999 can be achieved for a relaxation time of 0.5 ms. We also model and simulate a microstrip-SQUID amplifier of frequency about 500 MHz, which could be used to amplify the resonator oscillations in the phase qubit adiabatic measurement. The voltage gain and the amplifier noise temperature are calculated. We simulate the preparation of a generalized Bell state and compute the relaxation times required for achieving high fidelities. We consider two capacitively coupled phase qubits similar to that used in the experimental work of R. Bialczak et al. (Nature Physics, 6, 409, 2010). The Bell state was created using a NOT gate and a universal entangling gate. We solved the equation of motion for the density matrix with the Bloch relaxation times, T{sub 1} and T{sub 2}. For every qubit we took into consideration all the states in the shallow well including the states outside the qubit manifold. Also we took into consideration unwanted interaction between the qubits during the application of the NOT gate. The NOT gate was implemented using a Gaussian pulse assuming the frequency difference between the two qubits is 200 MHz. An entangling gate was implemented reducing this frequency difference to zero. We have found the optimal parameters for the Gaussian pulse and the optimal duration for the entangling gate. We have shown that the maximum fidelity of 0.99 can be achieved for the minimum relaxation time, T{sub 1} = 1.2 {micro}s, if T{sub 2} = 2T{sub 1}. By slightly increasing the required value of T{sub 1}, one can sharply reduce the required value for T{sub 2}.
We present a theoretical study of a superconducting charge qubit dispersively coupled to a transmission line resonator. Starting from a master equation description of this coupled system and using a polaron transformation, we obtain an exact effective master equation for the qubit. We then use quantum trajectory theory to investigate the measurement of the qubit by continuous homodyne measurement of the resonator out field. Using the same polaron transformation, a stochastic master equation for the conditional state of the qubit is obtained. From this result, various definitions of the measurement time are studied. Furthermore, we find that in the limit of strong homodyne measurement, typical quantum trajectories for the qubit exhibit a crossover from diffusive to jumplike behavior. Finally, in the presence of Rabi drive on the qubit, the qubit dynamics is shown to exhibit quantum Zeno behavior.
The speed and fidelity of dispersive readout of superconducting qubits should improve by increasing the amplitude of the measurement drive. Experiments show, however, that beyond some drive amplitude there is always a saturation or drop in fidelity, often associated with a decrease in qubit energy relaxation time T1. A simple Lindblad master equation does not capture the latter effect. More involved approaches based on effective master equations rely on strong assumptions about the spectra of the system and the bath and only partially agree with observations. Here, we perform a first-principles simulation of the full unitary dynamics of dispersive readout by considering the circuit QED Hamiltonian coupled to a microscopic model for the measurement transmission line, allowing for its arbitrary spectrum, including filters. Our access to the dynamics of the bath degrees of freedom allows us to investigate the emission spectrum of the system as a function of drive power. We show how the dependence of qubit T1 on readout drive amplitude is sensitive to the details of the bath spectrum. In particular, we find that T1 drops with increasing drive amplitude when a Purcell notch filter is placed at the qubit frequency, and that the Lindblad master equation shows general qualitative defects compared to the first-principles model.
The quantum state of a superconducting qubit nonresonantly coupled to a transmission line resonator can be determined by measuring the quadrature amplitudes of an electromagnetic field transmitted through the resonator. We present experiments in which we analyze in detail the dynamics of the transmitted field as a function of the measurement frequency for both weak continuous and pulsed measurements. We find excellent agreement between our data and calculations based on a set of Bloch-type differential equations for the cavity field derived from the dispersive Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian including dissipation. We show that the measured system response can be used to construct a measurement operator from which the qubit population can be inferred accurately. Such a measurement operator can be used in tomographic methods to reconstruct single and multiqubit states in ensemble-averaged measurements.
We analyze the dispersive readout of superconducting charge and flux qubits as a quantum measurement process. The measurement oscillator frequency is considered much lower than the qubit frequency. This regime is interesting because large detuning allows for strong coupling between the measurement oscillator and the signal transmission line, thus allowing for fast readout. Due to the large detuning we may not use the rotating wave approximation in the oscillator-qubit coupling. Instead we start from an approximation where the qubit follows the oscillator adiabatically, and show that non-adiabatic corrections are small. We find analytic expressions for the measurement time, as well as for the back-action, both while measuring and in the off-state. The quantum efficiency is found to be unity within our approximation, both for charge and flux qubit readout.
Spectral properties of a quantum circuit are efficiently read out by monitoring the resonance frequency shift it induces in a microwave resonator coupled to it. When the two systems are strongly detuned, theory attributes the shift to an effective resonator capacitance or inductance that depends on the quantum circuit state. At small detuning, the shift arises from the exchange of virtual photons, as described by the Jaynes-Cummings model. Here we present a theory bridging these two limits and illustrate, with several examples, its necessity for a general description of quantum circuits readout. Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics (cQED) is at the heart of most advanced superconducting quantum technologies. Different types of superconducting qubits can be strongly coupled to microwave resonators thus achieving regimes and phenomenena which cannot be reached within the realm of quantum optics [1]. More recently, strong coupling between microwave resonators and a variety of other quantum systems not necessarily involving superconductors has been achieved [2], extending further the realm of cQED. In all these applications the measurement of the qubit or the hybrid device state is achieved by monitoring the resonator properties. Theoretically , two regimes have been approached using disconnected descriptions [3]: the dispersive regime, where the qubit-resonator detuning is larger than the coupling strength yet small enough to allow the exchange of virtual photons, and the adiabatic regime, where the de-tuning is sufficiently large for virtual processes to be strongly suppressed. The dispersive regime, which describes level repulsion between those of the quantum circuit and of the resonator, is typically dealt with using a Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian within different levels of approximation [3-10]. In contrast, the adiabatic regime accounts for the renormalization of the resonator capaci-tance/inductance by the effective capacitance of the circuit , including its "quantum capacitance" [11, 12], or its effective inductance [13, 14], which modifies the resonator frequency [15, 16]. However, there is no actual border between these two regimes which could justify a separate treatment, as illustrated by recent experiments on hybrid cQED setups [17] that reveal features of both regimes for the same device. This situation claims for a unified description of quantum circuits readout, going beyond the standard Jaynes-Cummings model, which could be applied to different types of devices over a large range of parameters. * Corresponding author : a.l.yeyati@uam.es In the present Letter we derive a general expression for the resonator frequency shift when coupled to a generic quantum circuit. This expression naturally interpolates between the adiabatic and the dispersive regimes, thus allowing to clarify their origin from the same coupling Hamiltonian. In addition our formalism is not restricted to the usual two-level approximations but any multilevel situation can be described on the same footing. We illustrate the importance of the different terms in our expression by analyzing well-known models like a short single channel superconducting weak link hosting Andreev states, the RF-SQUID and the Cooper pair box. Resonator-quantum circuit coupling.-The system we consider comprises a resonant circuit and a quantum circuit coupled through phase or charge fluctuations as depicted in Figs. 1(a), 2(a) and in the inset of Fig. 3. The resonant circuit is represented as a lumped-element LC resonator with bare resonance frequency f r = ω r /2π, with ω r = 1/ √ L r C r. Introducing the photon annihilation (creation) operators a (a †), it can be described by the Hamiltonian H r = ω r a † a. On the other hand, the quantum circuit Hamiltonian,Ĥ qc (x), depends on a dimensionless control parameter x, corresponding to an excess charge on a capacitor or a flux through a loop. We denote by |Φ i (x) the eigenstates of the uncoupled quantum circuit,Ĥ qc (x)|Φ i (x) = E i (x)|Φ i (x). Flux (charge) fluctuations in the resonator lead to x → x 0 +x r , wherex r = λ(s a + s * a †) with a coupling constant λ, depending on a coupling scheme [19], and s = 1 (−i). We assume λ 1 in accordance with experiments. The resonator-quantum circuit coupling HamiltonianĤ c is obtained by expandingĤ qc (x 0 +x r) up to second order inx rĤ c (x 0) =x rĤ qc (x 0) +x 2 r 2Ĥ qc (x 0), (1) where the prime stands for the derivative with respect to x. The Hamiltonian describing resonator, quantum