The electron theory of metals revived by Sommerfeld assumes that an electron moves in a metal as though this were an equipotential medium. Considering the nuclei fixed and regularly spaced we obtain a potential periodic in space coordinates. To study the effect of such fields we may simplify the problem so as to contain only one periodic term for each coordinate in its expression for potential. This problem can be reduced further to a one-dimensional one, of which the simplest example is the motion of an electron in a field with potential cos x or sin x. Darwin has shown that a suitable combination or packet of elementary de Broglie waves is capable of moving coherently in several instances. The motion of such a packet is found to be equivalent to that of a particle in classical dynamics with the Heissenberg uncertainty relation. The wave packet is used here for the motion of the electron in a periodic field. The result obtained is equivalent to that of classical dynamics. The wave packet again moves as a particle with an uncertainty relation.
The electron theory of metals revived by Sommerfeld assumes that an electron moves in a metal as though this were an equipotential medium. Considering the nuclei fixed and regularly spaced we obtain a potential periodic in space coordinates. To study the effect of such fields we may simplify the problem so as to contain only one periodic term for each coordinate in its expression for potential. This problem can be reduced further to a one-dimensional one, of which the simplest example is the motion of an electron in a field with potential cos x or sin x. Darwin has shown that a suitable combination or packet of elementary de Broglie waves is capable of moving coherently in several instances. The motion of such a packet is found to be equivalent to that of a particle in classical dynamics with the Heissenberg uncertainty relation. The wave packet is used here for the motion of the electron in a periodic field. The result obtained is equivalent to that of classical dynamics. The wave packet again moves as a particle with an uncertainty relation.
The paper deals with the motion of a Gaussian wave-packet in a parabolic potential field, contrasting the quantum-mechanical behaviour of the packet with that which follows from pure classical mechanics. The behaviour is entirely classical only if the initial phase of the space-wave-function is linear in the space coordinate; in which case the wave-packet is initially a ‘best-possible’ packet according to Heisenberg's uncertainty relationship. The paper concludes with a brief reference to the similar problem for a free particle. Note added in Proof, 16 February 1946. Through the courtesy of Mr M. S. Bartlett, we have been privileged to see the manuscripts of some work by Mr J. E. Moyal and himself, in which the motion of a probability wave-packet is discussed in more general terms than our own: and in which it appears that the motion of our wave-packet, which we have described as non-classical, is indeed actually classical provided that a certain correlation exists between momentum and position in the p, q-distribution function. With this knowledge we now find that classical and quantal predictions agree precisely provided that the initial classical probability function is given by this is a particular case of their more general results.
A motion of a Gaussian wave packet of a single electron in a harmonic potential is obtained by solving the time dependent Schrödinger equation analytically. The analytic formula of the phase of the wave function which depends on both time and space is also presented explicitly. The probability density of the wave packet moves changing its width and central position periodically. The period of the change of the width is half of that of the central position. The interpretation of these periodic changes in terms of the Green's function which can be derived by the path integration formulation is also discussed.
Essentially, we solve the particle-field equations obtained in the matter distribution quantum mechanics. In the framework of this theory, a particle is described by a density amplitude function, we call wave function, as a packet of waves with the time dependent phases proportional to the relativistic Lagrangian. The mass quantization of such a particle, as a distribution of matter, is obtained from the equality of the spatial integral of the density with the mass as a characteristic of the relativistic dynamics of this matter. The particle dynamics, as a motion of a mass spatial distribution, is obtained from the equality of the wave propagation velocities with the distribution coordinate velocities. This description is a physical one, compared to the Schrödinger-Heisenberg description leading to unphysical results as a null velocity for the kinetic energy as a constant of motion, or Zitterbewegung. The description of a particle interaction with an electromagnetic field by additional Lagrangian terms, with a vector potential conjugated to coordinates, as in the Aharonov-Bohm effect, and an electric potential conjugated to time, leads to the Lorentz force, and the Maxwell equations. In the two conjugated spaces, of the coordinates and of the momentum, the dynamics of a quantum particle is described by propagation operators, depending on the coordinate-momentum product, applied to time dependent wave functions satisfying matter-field equations. Unlike the standard Schrödinger or Schrödinger-Dirac equations, depending only on the Hamiltonian operator, instead of the Hamiltonian these equations contain the Lagrangian, which, besides the Hamiltonian, include additional terms with an explicit dependence on velocity, as it is expected in a relativistic theory. We obtain the wave function of a particle-antiparticle system interacting with an electromagnetic field, as a wave packet of spinors propagating in space with finite dimensions, given by the finite definition domain of the density function, in the space of the matter-field momentum, as a constant of motion. We show that an electrically charged quantum particle, rotating in a central electric field, generates a vector potential with a magnetic field perpendicular to the rotational plane and an electric field in this plane. By a quantum transition, a photon is emitted in the particle rotational plane, with the magnetic field perpendicular to this plane, and the electric field contained in this plane. In this framework, the vector potential rotation is correlated to a particle momentum rotation, for the canonical matter-field momentum as a constant of motion, without any electromagnetic field radiated outside.
The relationship between classical and quantum mechanics is explored in an intuitive manner by the exercise of constructing a wave in association with a classical particle. Using special relativity, the time coordinate in the frame of reference of a moving particle is expressed in terms of the coordinates in the laboratory frame of reference in order to provide an initial spatiotemporal function to work from in initiating the development of a quantum wave. When temporal periodicity is ascribed to the particle, a provisional spatiotemporal function for a particle travelling at constant velocity manifests itself as an running wave characterized by parameters associated with the moving particle. A wave description for bidirectional motion is generated based on an average time coordinate for a combination of oppositely directed elementary running waves, and the resulting spatiotemporal function exhibits wave behavior characteristic of a standing wave. Ascribing directional orientation to the intrinsic periodicity of the particle introduces directional sub-states; variations in the relative number of sub-states as a function of angle in combined states lead to spatially varying magnitudes for the associated waves. Further analysis leads to full mathematical expression for all waves representing free particle motion. A generalization for particles subject to force fields enables us to develop a governing differential equation identical in form to the Schroedinger equation.
Non-relativistic de Broglie–Bohm theory describes particles moving under the guidance of the wave function. In de Broglieʼs original formulation, the particle dynamics is given by a first-order differential equation. In Bohmʼs reformulation, it is given by Newtonʼs law of motion with an extra potential that depends on the wave function—the quantum potential—together with a constraint on the possible velocities. It was recently argued, mainly by numerical simulations, that relaxing this velocity constraint leads to a physically untenable theory. We provide further evidence for this by showing that for various wave functions the particles tend to escape the wave packet. In particular, we show that for a central classical potential and bound energy eigenstates the particle motion is often unbounded. This work seems particularly relevant for ways of simulating wave function evolution based on Bohmʼs formulation of the de Broglie–Bohm theory. Namely, the simulations may become unstable due to deviations from the velocity constraint.
In a previous note (1) we argued that the free particle classical action A (relativistic or nonrelativistic) may be written in terms of v=x/t and then varied in x and t independently. One finds that dA/dx partial = p and dA/dt partial = -E implying A= -Et+px with x and t independent. This is the opposite of the classical mechanical idea of x(t). Creating an eigenvalue equation yields -id/dx partial exp(iA) = pexp(iA) and id/dt partial exp(iA) = Eexp(iA). exp(iA) plays the role of an unusual type of probability we argue which describes two dimensional periodicity (cos(px) and sin(px) ). We have argued that the quantum particle is the medium for a two dimensional wavelike motion of an energy-momentum wave. A wave type structure is needed to describe dynamics (like a classical wave), but unlike a classical wave two dimensions are required because there is no preference of any x point for a free particle. Both cos(px) and sin(px) both treat x in a preferential manner as their values vary with x. For a classical wave this is fine because the creation point of the wave imposes boundary conditions, but there is no such boundary condition imposed on a free particle. exp(ipx-iEt0 must somehow then link to P(x)=constant. One may note that exp(-iA)exp(iA) = 1 for the free particle. This may be argued to be linked to spatial invariance i.e. P(x)=constant where P(x) is not exp(ipx). Here we argue that exp(-iA)exp(iA) represents a product of two unusual probabilities , one for motion in a certain direction and the other for the time reversed scenario. If the quantum particle is the medium of an energy-momentum wave exp(-iEt+ipx), then the product of the regular and time reversed unusual probabilities cancel or undo each other. In other words one does not see any change in space as long as one has a noninteracting exp(-iEt+ipx) . Given that -id/dx is a linear operator this product yields a momentum of 0. We consider this idea and its implications on a momentum distribution Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx) which may represent a bound state or other states. In particular, it seems that P(x)=W*(x,t)W(x,t) which yields a classical type of probability (P(x) real, positive and normalized to 1) is linked to a product (merging) of forward and time reversed situations so that any spatial density which remain due to the quantum particle acting as a medium for an energy-momentum wave (as well as the time reversed part) would represent an actual change in spatial density. exp(ipx) already contains two periodic spatial functions (cos(px) and sin(px)), but does not manifest it unless there is an interaction.