Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Il Nuovo Cimento B

A note on measurement

John Earman, Abner Shimony

Published Apr 1, 1968• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02710751

Related papers

A note on measurement

Bernard d’Espagnat

arXiv:quant-ph/0101141•Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 2001•18 citations

Phase, Measurement, and Energy: A Structural Note

Yasuo Tanaka

This technical note offers a structural interpretation of phase, measurement, and relativistic energy within standard quantum mechanics and special relativity. Without introducing new equations, constants, or experimental predictions, it clarifies the roles of phase evolution, reference fixation in measurement, and proper-time phase in relativistic energy relations. The note is intended as a long-term conceptual reference for discussions in quantum foundations and related areas.

•Jan 11, 2026•0 citations

A note on the joint measurability of POVMs and its implications for contextuality

Ravi Kunjwal

The purpose of this note is to clarify the logical relationship between joint measurability and contextuality for quantum observables in view of recent developments [1-4].

arXiv:1403.0470•Mar 3, 2014•5 citations

More on Measurement

Philip R. Wallace

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Against “Measurement”

J. S. Bell

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1990•154 citations

TN3: Quantum-Pointer Hamiltonian Realisation of the Bell-Singlet Correlation

Zayn Blore

This technical note gives an explicit quantum-pointer measurement construction for the two-qubit Bell singlet within the finite-dimensional geometric framework used in Constraint-Surface Dynamics. Technical Note 2 previously showed, at the probability-functional level, that the singlet state gives the standard correlation E(a,b) = -a · b. The present note supplies the corresponding system-apparatus construction. It uses the standard von Neumann measurement Hamiltonian, with two qubits coupled to two finite-dimensional pointer sectors, and shows how the measurement interaction separates the four pointer branches associated with outcomes s,t = ±1. The pointer-sector projectors define the operational outcome sectors for each measurement context. In the strong-readout limit, their branch weights reproduce the standard singlet probabilities P_st(a,b) = (1 - st a · b)/4, giving E(a,b) = -a · b. The local marginals remain equal to 1/2, so operational no-signalling follows by direct marginal summation. The role of this note is compatibility and architectural closure. It does not introduce a new measurement Hamiltonian, does not derive the Born rule independently, and does not rely on Fubini-Study Voronoi volumes or isotropy-to-linearity arguments. Instead, it shows that the standard quantum-pointer measurement model embeds cleanly into the finite-dimensional geometric reconstruction. In the CSD interpretive layer, outcomes are treated as context-indexed sectors rather than Bell-local factorised hidden-variable assignments. The note should be read downstream of Paper B and Technical Note 2, and as preparation for the later Lean formalisation target assigned to LF3.

•May 16, 2026•0 citations
This technical note gives an explicit quantum-pointer measurement construction for the two-qubit Bell singlet within the finite-dimensional geometric framework used in Constraint-Surface Dynamics. Technical Note 2 previously showed, at the probability-functional level, that the singlet state gives the standard correlation E(a,b) = -a · b. The present note supplies the corresponding system-apparatus construction. It uses the standard von Neumann measurement Hamiltonian, with two qubits coupled to two finite-dimensional pointer sectors, and shows how the measurement interaction separates the four pointer branches associated with outcomes s,t = ±1. The pointer-sector projectors define the operational outcome sectors for each measurement context. In the strong-readout limit, their branch weights reproduce the standard singlet probabilities P_st(a,b) = (1 - st a · b)/4, giving E(a,b) = -a · b. The local marginals remain equal to 1/2, so operational no-signalling follows by direct marginal summation. The role of this note is compatibility and architectural closure. It does not introduce a new measurement Hamiltonian, does not derive the Born rule independently, and does not rely on Fubini-Study Voronoi volumes or isotropy-to-linearity arguments. Instead, it shows that the standard quantum-pointer measurement model embeds cleanly into the finite-dimensional geometric reconstruction. In the CSD interpretive layer, outcomes are treated as context-indexed sectors rather than Bell-local factorised hidden-variable assignments. The note should be read downstream of Paper B and Technical Note 2, and as preparation for the later Lean formalisation target assigned to LF3.