Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Molecular Physics

The relationship between classical phases in cartesian and action-angle variables

Simon J. Fraser, Luis Gottdiener, John Norman Murrell

Published Feb 1, 1975• 30 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The relationship between the momentum representation of the classical phase in action-angle variables and the coordinate representation in cartesian coordinates has terms which are associated with discontinuities in the f 2 generator of the transformation between the two coordinate systems. The importance of these terms has not been emphasized in some earlier work.

DOI
10.1080/00268977500100351

Related papers

Derivation of the coordinate-momentum commutation relations from canonical invariance

Moshe Shapiro

Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value $ih$ where $h$ is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.

Physical Review A•Oct 31, 2006•5 citations

Application of action-angle variables to the calculation of the density matrix

Kenneth A. Dawson

Using the analogy of action-angle variables in classical mechanics we introduce the notion of quantum actions in the calculation of the density matrix. The result is an integral representation of the density matrix in its semiclassical limit. This involves only the classical generating functions.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 1, 1985•0 citations

Canonical transformations to action and phase-angle variables and phase operators

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

The well-known difficulties of defining a phase operator of an oscillator are considered from the point of view of the canonical transformation to action and phase-angle variables. This transformation turns out to be nonbijective, i.e., it is not a one-to-one onto mapping. In order to make possible the unitarity of its representations in quantum optics we should enlarge the Hilbert space of the problem. In this enlarged space we find a phase operator that, after projection, reproduces previous candidates to represent a well-behaved phase operator in the quantum domain.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1993•18 citations

The Structure of Integrable One-Dimensional Systems

Bill Sutherland

We explain the relationship between the classical description of an integrable system in terms of invariant tori and action-angle variables, and the quantum description in terms of the asymptotic Bethe ansatz.

arXiv:0708.0334•Aug 2, 2007•0 citations

Classical, quantum mechanical, and semiclassical representations of resonant dynamics: A unified treatment

Craig C. Martens, Gregory S. Ezra

This paper addresses the general problem of zeroth order representation of resonant dynamics. We investigate the classical, quantum mechanical, and semiclassical transformation properties of two-dimensional isotropic and anisotropic uncoupled harmonic oscillators. The classical and quantal theories are presented in a manner that emphasizes the strong correspondence between the two, and in particular, the SU(2) symmetry exhibited by both the classical and quantum oscillators. The classical canonical transformations relating the action-angle variables appropriate for normal, local, and precessional motion of the isotropic oscillator are derived by explicit calculation of the generating functions. By employing a simple mapping relating the anisotropic and isotropic oscillators, expressions for action-angle variables appropriate for the topology of an arbitrary m:n resonance are determined. The resulting invariant tori are compared with the corresponding quantum mechanical wave functions and phase space densities. The relationship between the classical and quantum mechanical theories is illustrated by determining semiclassical approximations to the unitary transformation matrix elements, which are given in terms of the classical generating functions. Applications to problems of current interest, such as the adiabatic switching method for semiclassical quantization of nonseparable systems, are briefly discussed.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jul 1, 1987•43 citations

Physics of Unitary Transformations

K. Kong Wan

Q23(1) Explain why a coordinate representation space and its corresponding momentum representation space introduced in §18.4.2 give rise to two mathematically different descriptions of the position and momentum which are physically equivalent.

•Aug 27, 2020•0 citations
The relationship between the momentum representation of the classical phase in action-angle variables and the coordinate representation in cartesian coordinates has terms which are associated with discontinuities in the f 2 generator of the transformation between the two coordinate systems. The importance of these terms has not been emphasized in some earlier work.
Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value ihihih where hhh is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.
The well-known difficulties of defining a phase operator of an oscillator are considered from the point of view of the canonical transformation to action and phase-angle variables. This transformation turns out to be nonbijective, i.e., it is not a one-to-one onto mapping. In order to make possible the unitarity of its representations in quantum optics we should enlarge the Hilbert space of the problem. In this enlarged space we find a phase operator that, after projection, reproduces previous candidates to represent a well-behaved phase operator in the quantum domain.
This paper addresses the general problem of zeroth order representation of resonant dynamics. We investigate the classical, quantum mechanical, and semiclassical transformation properties of two-dimensional isotropic and anisotropic uncoupled harmonic oscillators. The classical and quantal theories are presented in a manner that emphasizes the strong correspondence between the two, and in particular, the SU(2) symmetry exhibited by both the classical and quantum oscillators. The classical canonical transformations relating the action-angle variables appropriate for normal, local, and precessional motion of the isotropic oscillator are derived by explicit calculation of the generating functions. By employing a simple mapping relating the anisotropic and isotropic oscillators, expressions for action-angle variables appropriate for the topology of an arbitrary m:n resonance are determined. The resulting invariant tori are compared with the corresponding quantum mechanical wave functions and phase space densities. The relationship between the classical and quantum mechanical theories is illustrated by determining semiclassical approximations to the unitary transformation matrix elements, which are given in terms of the classical generating functions. Applications to problems of current interest, such as the adiabatic switching method for semiclassical quantization of nonseparable systems, are briefly discussed.