Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Comment on “On the energy levels of a finite square-well potential” [J. Math. Phys. 41, 4551 (2000)]

David L. Aronstein, Carlos R. Stroud

Published Dec 1, 2000• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.1322081

Related papers

Comment on: “Bound-State Energies of a Particle in a Finite Square Well”

James J. Murphy

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1971•1 citation

Comment on “A single equation for finite rectangular well energy eigenvalues,” by B. Cameron Reed [Am. J. Phys. 58 (5), 503–504 (1990)]

Harry A. Mavromatis

American Journal of Physics•Dec 1, 2000•2 citations

Comment on “The hidden symmetry for a quantum system with an infinitely deep square-well potential,” by Shi-Hai Dong and Zhong-Qi Ma [Am. J. Phys. 70 (5), 520–521 (2002)]

Asim Gangopadhyaya, Jeffry V. Mallow A

American Journal of Physics•Jan 10, 2003•1 citation

Comment on “On the consistency of the solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation” [J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)]

Selçuk Ş. Bayın

Hawkins and Schwarz [J. Math. Phys. 54, 014101 (2013)]10.1063/1.4772533 claim that there is a flaw in the way certain integrals are evaluated to show the consistency of the infinite square well solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation [S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)10.1063/1.4705268; S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 084101 (2012)]10.1063/1.4739758. We give additional details about how these integrals are evaluated and show that there is no inconsistency for an infinite square well.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 2013•11 citations

The square lattice Ising model on the rectangle II: finite-size scaling limit

Alfred Hucht

Abstract Based on the results published recently (Hucht 2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 065201), the universal finite-size contributions to the free energy of the square lattice Ising model on the L × M rectangle, with open boundary conditions in both directions, are calculated exactly in the finite-size scaling limit L , M → ∞ , T → T c , with fixed temperature scaling variable x ∝ ( T / T c − 1 ) M and fixed aspect ratio ρ ∝ L / M . We derive exponentially fast converging series for the related Casimir potential and Casimir force scaling functions. At the critical point T = T c we confirm predictions from conformal field theory (Cardy and Peschel 1988 Nucl. Phys . B 300 377, Kleban and Vassileva 1991 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen . 24 3407). The presence of corners and the related corner free energy has dramatic impact on the Casimir scaling functions and leads to a logarithmic divergence of the Casimir potential scaling function at criticality.

arXiv:1701.08722•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Apr 5, 2017•21 citations

Comment on ’’Bound-state eigenvalues of the square-well potential’’

Jasper D. Memory

American Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1977•5 citations
Hawkins and Schwarz [J. Math. Phys. 54, 014101 (2013)]10.1063/1.4772533 claim that there is a flaw in the way certain integrals are evaluated to show the consistency of the infinite square well solutions of the space fractional Schrödinger equation [S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 042105 (2012)10.1063/1.4705268; S. S. Bayin, J. Math. Phys. 53, 084101 (2012)]10.1063/1.4739758. We give additional details about how these integrals are evaluated and show that there is no inconsistency for an infinite square well.
Abstract Based on the results published recently (Hucht 2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor . 50 065201), the universal finite-size contributions to the free energy of the square lattice Ising model on the L × M rectangle, with open boundary conditions in both directions, are calculated exactly in the finite-size scaling limit L , M → ∞ , T → T c , with fixed temperature scaling variable x ∝ ( T / T c − 1 ) M and fixed aspect ratio ρ ∝ L / M . We derive exponentially fast converging series for the related Casimir potential and Casimir force scaling functions. At the critical point T = T c we confirm predictions from conformal field theory (Cardy and Peschel 1988 Nucl. Phys . B 300 377, Kleban and Vassileva 1991 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen . 24 3407). The presence of corners and the related corner free energy has dramatic impact on the Casimir scaling functions and leads to a logarithmic divergence of the Casimir potential scaling function at criticality.