Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Why quantum dynamics can be formulated as a Markov process

Piotr Garbaczewski, Robert Olkiewicz

Published May 1, 1995• 19 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We invert the well-developed strategy of studying dynamics in terms of probability densities and investigate the problem of the most likely microscopic propagation scenario, which is consistent with the given priori (possibly phenomenological) input-output statistics data for the process taking place in a finite-time interval. A solution of this so-called Schr\"odinger problem is known to provide an adequate probabilistic framework for the measure preserving dynamics which is Markovian. We pay particular attention to the subclass of nonstationary solutions, determined by unitary-wave-packet evolution (Schr\"odinger wave mechanics). The existence of the pertinent Markovian diffusion is known on general grounds, but no explicit demonstration (through detailed computational arguments) until now was available even in the simplest cases. We give a definitive probabilistic description of the free quantum dynamics as a stochastic process solving Schr\"odinger's interpolation problem. The Markov diffusion arised as a particular case singled out by a suitable Feynman-Kac semigroup.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.51.3445

Related papers

Feynman–Kac kernels in Markovian representations of the Schrödinger interpolating dynamics

Piotr Garbaczewski, Robert Olkiewicz

Probabilistic solutions of the so-called Schrödinger boundary data problem provide for a unique Markovian interpolation between any two strictly positive probability densities designed to form the input–output statistics data for the process taking place in a finite-time interval. The key issue is to select the jointly continuous in all variables positive Feynman–Kac kernel, appropriate for the phenomenological (physical) situation. We extend the existing formulations of the problem to cases when the kernel is not a fundamental solution of a parabolic equation, and prove the existence of a continuous Markovian interpolation in this case. Next, we analyze the compatibility of this stochastic evolution with the original parabolic dynamics, which is assumed to be governed by the temporally adjoint pair of (parabolic) partial differential equations, and prove that the pertinent random motion is a diffusion process. In particular, in conjunction with Born’s statistical interpretation postulate in quantum theory, we consider stochastic processes which are compatible with the Schrödinger picture quantum evolution.

arXiv:quant-ph/9505012•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1996•28 citations

Schrödinger's interpolation problem and its probabilistic solutions

Piotr Garbaczewski

Abstract: Probablistic solutions of the so called Schrödinger boundary data problem provide for a unique Markovian interpolation between any two strictly positive probability densities designed to form the input-output statistics data for a certain dynamical process taking place in a finite-time interval. The key problem is to select the jointly continuous in all variables positive semigroup kernel, appropriate for the phenomenological (physical) situation. The issue of deriving a microscopic dynamics from the input-output statistics data (analyzed in terms of densities) was addressed, as the Schrödinger problem of a probabilistic interpolation, in a number of publications [1] – [6]. We shall consider Markovian propagation scenarios so remaining within the well established framework, where for any two Borel sets A, B ⊂ R on which the strictly positive boundary densities ρ(x, 0) and ρ(x, T) are defined, the transition probability m(A, B) from the set A to the set B in the time interval T> 0 has a bi-variate density given in a specific factorized form: m(x, y) = f(x)k(x, 0, y, T)g(y), with marginals: ∫

Technical Physics•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

Comment on ‘‘Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process’’

Piotr Garbaczewski, Robert Olkiewicz

In the paper with the above-noted title, D. T. Gillespie [Phys. Rev. A 49, 1607 (1994)] claims that the theory of Markov stochastic processes cannot provide an adequate mathematical framework for quantum mechanics. In conjunction with the specific quantum dynamics considered there, we give a general analysis of the associated dichotomic jump processes. If we assume that Gillespie's ``measurement probabilities'' are the transition probabilities of a stochastic process, then the process must have an invariant (time independent) probability measure. Alternatively, if we demand the probability measure of the process follow the quantally implemented (via the Born statistical postulate) evolution, then we arrive at the jump process which can be interpreted as a Markov process if restricted to a suitable duration time. However, there is no corresponding Markov process consistent with the ${\mathit{Z}}_{2}$ event space assumption, if we require its existence for all times t\ensuremath{\in}${\mathbf{R}}_{+}$. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:quant-ph/9601016•Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1996•4 citations

The Schroedinger Problem, Levy Processes Noise in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Piotr Garbaczewski, John R. Klauder, Robert Olkiewicz

The main purpose of the paper is an essentially probabilistic analysis of relativistic quantum mechanics. It is based on the assumption that whenever probability distributions arise, there exists a stochastic process that is either responsible for temporal evolution of a given measure or preserves the measure in the stationary case. Our departure point is the so-called Schrödinger problem of probabilistic evolution, which provides for a unique Markov stochastic interpolation between any given pair of boundary probability densities for a process covering a fixed, finite duration of time, provided we have decided a priori what kind of primordial dynamical semigroup transition mechanism is involved. In the nonrelativistic theory, including quantum mechanics, Feyman-Kac-like kernels are the building blocks for suitable transition probability densities of the process. In the standard "free" case (Feynman-Kac potential equal to zero) the familiar Wiener noise is recovered. In the framework of the Schrödinger problem, the "free noise" can also be extended to any infinitely divisible probability law, as covered by the Lévy-Khintchine formula. Since the relativistic Hamiltonians $|\nabla |$

arXiv:chao-dyn/9505003•May 9, 1995•0 citations

Stochastic Theory of Quantum Mechanics

M. Godart

The stochastic theory of non-relativistic quantum mechanics presented here relies heavily upon the theory of stochastic processes, with its definitions, theorems and specific vocabulary as well. Its main hypothesis states indeed that the classical trajectories of the particles are identical to the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process, whose conditional probability density is proposed as a substitute for the wave function. The Schroedinger equation and the so-called Nelson equations are used to determine the diffusion tensor and the drift vectors characteristic of such a process. It is then possible to write down the forward and backward Kolmogorov equations that are used to determine the conditional probability density, as well as the Fokker-Planck equation that is used to determine the normal probability density. This method is applied to several simple cases and the results obtained are compared with those of the orthodox theory. Among the most important differences let us mention that any system evolving freely from any original state returns spontaneously to its ground state, that the definitions of the particles velocities and momenta are impossible because the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process nowhere possess a derivative with respect to time and that the so-called collapse of the wave function is a mere mirage explained by the updating choice between new and older initial conditions in the resolution of partial differential equations. We finally attempt to extend the proposed theory to the domain of the relativistic quantum mechanics. It is promising but is clearly unfinished because it has not been possible up to now to solve the Nelson and Kolmogorov equations, except in the very simple case of a free particle.

arXiv:1206.2917•Jun 13, 2012•3 citations

On stochastic theories of quantum mechanics

James G. Gilson

Introduction. There exists a very comprehensive theory concerning the time development of probabilistic systems. This is the Theory of Stochastic processes (1). Quantum mechanics as described by the Schrödinger equation rests very heavily on probabilistic interpretation, and yet, after forty years of remarkably rapid advances and successes, it is not clear how it is related to stochastic theory. The formal similarity of certain aspects of, and equations used in these two theories are well known. The diffusion equation corresponds to the Schrödinger equation, a correspondence only marred by a square root of minus unity appearing with the time derivative in the latter equation. The Kolmogoroff–Chapman relation for probabilities in Brownian motion has an analogue (2) in quantum mechanics, not for probabilities though, but for the complex probability amplitudes. The uncertainty relation also has a stochastic analogue (3). Some of these analogous characteristics are actually symptomatic of the gulf which separates these two theories. There are solutions to the diffusion equation which have a very clear physical probabilistic meaning. This is not the case with the corresponding and formally similar solutions to the Schrödinger equation and is partly due to the √ − 1 mentioned earlier. The probabilistic interpretation of the solutions to the diffusion equation is direct and immediate. On the other hand, the probabilistic interpretation of the solutions, ψ of the Schrödinger equation involve the introduction of the probability density, p = ψ*ψ. One great difference between these two theories lies in their each having distinct principles of linear superposition. In Stochastic Theory probabilities are superposed and in quantum mechanics amplitudes or wave functions are superposed.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Oct 1, 1968•36 citations
We invert the well-developed strategy of studying dynamics in terms of probability densities and investigate the problem of the most likely microscopic propagation scenario, which is consistent with the given priori (possibly phenomenological) input-output statistics data for the process taking place in a finite-time interval. A solution of this so-called Schr"odinger problem is known to provide an adequate probabilistic framework for the measure preserving dynamics which is Markovian. We pay particular attention to the subclass of nonstationary solutions, determined by unitary-wave-packet evolution (Schr"odinger wave mechanics). The existence of the pertinent Markovian diffusion is known on general grounds, but no explicit demonstration (through detailed computational arguments) until now was available even in the simplest cases. We give a definitive probabilistic description of the free quantum dynamics as a stochastic process solving Schr"odinger's interpolation problem. The Markov diffusion arised as a particular case singled out by a suitable Feynman-Kac semigroup.
Probabilistic solutions of the so-called Schrödinger boundary data problem provide for a unique Markovian interpolation between any two strictly positive probability densities designed to form the input–output statistics data for the process taking place in a finite-time interval. The key issue is to select the jointly continuous in all variables positive Feynman–Kac kernel, appropriate for the phenomenological (physical) situation. We extend the existing formulations of the problem to cases when the kernel is not a fundamental solution of a parabolic equation, and prove the existence of a continuous Markovian interpolation in this case. Next, we analyze the compatibility of this stochastic evolution with the original parabolic dynamics, which is assumed to be governed by the temporally adjoint pair of (parabolic) partial differential equations, and prove that the pertinent random motion is a diffusion process. In particular, in conjunction with Born’s statistical interpretation postulate in quantum theory, we consider stochastic processes which are compatible with the Schrödinger picture quantum evolution.
Abstract: Probablistic solutions of the so called Schrödinger boundary data problem provide for a unique Markovian interpolation between any two strictly positive probability densities designed to form the input-output statistics data for a certain dynamical process taking place in a finite-time interval. The key problem is to select the jointly continuous in all variables positive semigroup kernel, appropriate for the phenomenological (physical) situation. The issue of deriving a microscopic dynamics from the input-output statistics data (analyzed in terms of densities) was addressed, as the Schrödinger problem of a probabilistic interpolation, in a number of publications [1] – [6]. We shall consider Markovian propagation scenarios so remaining within the well established framework, where for any two Borel sets A, B ⊂ R on which the strictly positive boundary densities ρ(x, 0) and ρ(x, T) are defined, the transition probability m(A, B) from the set A to the set B in the time interval T> 0 has a bi-variate density given in a specific factorized form: m(x, y) = f(x)k(x, 0, y, T)g(y), with marginals: ∫
In the paper with the above-noted title, D. T. Gillespie [Phys. Rev. A 49, 1607 (1994)] claims that the theory of Markov stochastic processes cannot provide an adequate mathematical framework for quantum mechanics. In conjunction with the specific quantum dynamics considered there, we give a general analysis of the associated dichotomic jump processes. If we assume that Gillespie's ``measurement probabilities'' are the transition probabilities of a stochastic process, then the process must have an invariant (time independent) probability measure. Alternatively, if we demand the probability measure of the process follow the quantally implemented (via the Born statistical postulate) evolution, then we arrive at the jump process which can be interpreted as a Markov process if restricted to a suitable duration time. However, there is no corresponding Markov process consistent with the Z2{\mathit{Z}}_{2}Z2​ event space assumption, if we require its existence for all times t\ensuremath{\in}R+{\mathbf{R}}_{+}R+​. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
The main purpose of the paper is an essentially probabilistic analysis of relativistic quantum mechanics. It is based on the assumption that whenever probability distributions arise, there exists a stochastic process that is either responsible for temporal evolution of a given measure or preserves the measure in the stationary case. Our departure point is the so-called Schrödinger problem of probabilistic evolution, which provides for a unique Markov stochastic interpolation between any given pair of boundary probability densities for a process covering a fixed, finite duration of time, provided we have decided a priori what kind of primordial dynamical semigroup transition mechanism is involved. In the nonrelativistic theory, including quantum mechanics, Feyman-Kac-like kernels are the building blocks for suitable transition probability densities of the process. In the standard "free" case (Feynman-Kac potential equal to zero) the familiar Wiener noise is recovered. In the framework of the Schrödinger problem, the "free noise" can also be extended to any infinitely divisible probability law, as covered by the Lévy-Khintchine formula. Since the relativistic Hamiltonians ∣∇∣|\nabla |∣∇∣
The stochastic theory of non-relativistic quantum mechanics presented here relies heavily upon the theory of stochastic processes, with its definitions, theorems and specific vocabulary as well. Its main hypothesis states indeed that the classical trajectories of the particles are identical to the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process, whose conditional probability density is proposed as a substitute for the wave function. The Schroedinger equation and the so-called Nelson equations are used to determine the diffusion tensor and the drift vectors characteristic of such a process. It is then possible to write down the forward and backward Kolmogorov equations that are used to determine the conditional probability density, as well as the Fokker-Planck equation that is used to determine the normal probability density. This method is applied to several simple cases and the results obtained are compared with those of the orthodox theory. Among the most important differences let us mention that any system evolving freely from any original state returns spontaneously to its ground state, that the definitions of the particles velocities and momenta are impossible because the sample functions of a diffusion Markov process nowhere possess a derivative with respect to time and that the so-called collapse of the wave function is a mere mirage explained by the updating choice between new and older initial conditions in the resolution of partial differential equations. We finally attempt to extend the proposed theory to the domain of the relativistic quantum mechanics. It is promising but is clearly unfinished because it has not been possible up to now to solve the Nelson and Kolmogorov equations, except in the very simple case of a free particle.
Introduction. There exists a very comprehensive theory concerning the time development of probabilistic systems. This is the Theory of Stochastic processes (1). Quantum mechanics as described by the Schrödinger equation rests very heavily on probabilistic interpretation, and yet, after forty years of remarkably rapid advances and successes, it is not clear how it is related to stochastic theory. The formal similarity of certain aspects of, and equations used in these two theories are well known. The diffusion equation corresponds to the Schrödinger equation, a correspondence only marred by a square root of minus unity appearing with the time derivative in the latter equation. The Kolmogoroff–Chapman relation for probabilities in Brownian motion has an analogue (2) in quantum mechanics, not for probabilities though, but for the complex probability amplitudes. The uncertainty relation also has a stochastic analogue (3). Some of these analogous characteristics are actually symptomatic of the gulf which separates these two theories. There are solutions to the diffusion equation which have a very clear physical probabilistic meaning. This is not the case with the corresponding and formally similar solutions to the Schrödinger equation and is partly due to the √ − 1 mentioned earlier. The probabilistic interpretation of the solutions to the diffusion equation is direct and immediate. On the other hand, the probabilistic interpretation of the solutions, ψ of the Schrödinger equation involve the introduction of the probability density, p = ψ*ψ. One great difference between these two theories lies in their each having distinct principles of linear superposition. In Stochastic Theory probabilities are superposed and in quantum mechanics amplitudes or wave functions are superposed.