Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Philosophy of Science

Einstein's Dissatisfaction with Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics and Relativistic Quantum Field Theory

Miklós Rédei

Published Dec 1, 2010• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It is argued that in his critique of standard nonrelativistic quantum mechanics Einstein formulated three requirements as necessary for a physical theory to be compatible with the field-theorectical paradigm, and it is shown that local, relativistic, algebraic quantum field theory typically satisfies those criteria—although, there are still open questions concerning the status of operational separability of quantum systems localized in spacelike separated space-time regions. It is concluded that local algebraic quantum field theory can be viewed as a research program that Einstein suggested informally in 1948 and that was realized only later in mathematical physics.

DOI
10.1086/656819

Related papers

Einstein Meets von Neumann: Locality and Operational Independence in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

Miklós Rédei

Main Claim I argue in this chapter that Einstein and von Neumann meet in algebraic relativistic quantum field theory in the following metaphorical sense: algebraic quantum field theory was created in the late 1950s/early 1960s and was based on the theory of “rings of operators,” which von Neumann established in 1935–1940 (partly in collaboration with J. Murray). In the years 1936–1949, Einstein criticized standard, nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, arguing that it does not satisfy certain criteria that he regarded as necessary for any theory to be compatible with a field theoretical paradigm. I claim that algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) does satisfy those criteria and hence that AQFT can be viewed as a theory in which the mathematical machinery created by von Neumann made it possible to express in a mathematically explicit manner the physical intuition about field theory formulated by Einstein. The argument in favor of this claim has two components: 1. Historical : An interpretation of Einstein's (semi)formal wordings of his critique of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. This interpretation results in mathematically explicit operational independence definitions, which, I claim, express independence properties of systems that are localized in causally disjoint spacetime regions. Einstein regarded these as necessary for a theory to comply with field theoretical principles. 2. Systematic : The presentation of several propositions formulated in terms of AQFT that state that the operational independence conditions in question do in fact typically hold in AQFT.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 18, 2011•2 citations

2000]: ‘Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

Rob Clifton, Hans Halvorson

Entanglement has long been the subject of discussion by philosophers of quantum theory, and has recently come to play an essential role for physicists in their development of quantum information theory. In this paper we show how the formalism of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) provides a rigorous framework within which to analyze entanglement in the context of a fully relativistic formulation of quantum theory. What emerges from the analysis are new practical and theoretical limitations on an experimenter’s ability to perform operations on a field in one spacetime region that can disentangle its state from the state of the field in other spacelike-separated regions. These limitations show just how deeply entrenched entanglement is in relativistic quantum field theory, and yield a fresh perspective on the ways in which the theory differs conceptually from both standard nonrelativistic quantum theory and classical relativistic field theory. “...despite its conservative way of dealing with physical principles, algebraic QFT leads to a radical change of paradigm. Instead of the Newtonian view of a space-time filled with a material content one enters the reality of Leibniz created by relation (in particular inclusions) between ‘monads ’ (∼ the hyperfinite type III1 local von Neumann factors A(O) which as single algebras are nearly void of physical meaning) ” Schroer (1998, p. 302).

•Jan 31, 2000•73 citations

Relativistic Constraints on Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Wayne C. Myrvold

Nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is conceptually and mathematically simpler, and does, after all, work very well in a low-energy regime. Any solution of the measurement problem, or any account of the ontology of quantum theory, must yield sensible results in this regime, and so nonrelativistic quantum mechanics can serve as a testing ground for the viability of interpretations. On any approach, empirical adequacy requires recovery of at least an approximation to the quantum probabilities for outcomes of experiments, insofar as these have been verified by experiment. A quantum-mechanical theory is what results when one subjects a classical theory of a system with finitely many degrees of freedom to quantization. The task of extending additional beables theories to the context of quantum field theories remains a work in progress. A dynamical collapse theory modifies the evolution of the quantum state. Standard quantum theory predicts correlations between outcomes of spacelike separated experiments that violate Bell inequalities.

Routledge eBooks•Aug 11, 2021•7 citations

Relativistic Causality in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

John Earman, Giovanni Valente

This paper surveys the issue of relativistic causality within the framework of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). In doing so, we distinguish various notions of causality formulated in the literature and study their relationships, and thereby we offer what we hope to be a useful taxonomy. We propose that the most direct expression of relativistic causality in AQFT is captured not (as has sometimes been claimed) by the spectrum condition but rather by the axiom of local primitive causality, in that it entails a form of local determinism for quantum fields which generalizes the constraint of no superluminal propagation of classical field theories to relativistic quantum field theory. We discuss the status of the axiom of micro-causality by locating its place within a large family of separability/independence/locality conditions developed for AQFT and also by relating it to so-called no-signalling theorems. And we also provide a critical survey of attempts to understand the implications for relativistic causality of the distant correlations endemic to the states in models of AQFT satisfying the standard axioms, and we provide an assessment of attempts to employ Reichenbach's common cause principle in AQFT to defuse worries that these distant correlations implicate direct causal connections between relatively spacelike events.

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science•Jan 2, 2014•52 citations

A survey of causality in algebraic relativistic quantum field theory

Francisco Calderón Ossa

The axiomatic formulation of an Algebraic Relativistic Quantum Field Theory leads naturally -via the Haag-Kastler axioms- to the fact that operators representing observables generate a von Neumann algebra localized in a space-time region in which said observations are made. I present and explain the axioms, as well as the mathematical preliminaries needed to understand them and apply them to the so-called causal diamond and Fermi's Two-Atom System. The latter shows the importance of formulating axioms concerning causality that try to make compatible the requirement from Special Relativity according to which no causal influence can travel faster than the speed of light and the quantum mechanical theory of measurement and preparability of states. For a relativistic field-theoretic setting, these concepts must be re-formulated, and this reasoning suggests that the operator algebra must be a type III von Neumann factor. I also introduce some philosophical problems concerning our usual notion of causality from Hume to contemporary theories of counterfactual causation and show how the algebraic structure of the theory is deeply related to the causal one and how this theory can be extended if we change the way we think about causality, measurements, and local preparability of states.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Localization in quantum field theory

Riccardo Falcone, Claudio Conti

We review the issue of localization in quantum field theory and detail the nonrelativistic limit. Three distinct localization schemes are examined: the Newton–Wigner, the algebraic quantum field theory, and the modal scheme. Among these, the algebraic quantum field theory provides a fundamental concept of localization, rooted in its axiomatic formulation. In contrast, the Newton–Wigner scheme draws inspiration from the Born interpretation, applying mainly to the nonrelativistic regime. The modal scheme, relying on the representation of single particles as positive frequency modes of the Klein–Gordon equation, is found to be incompatible with the algebraic quantum field theory localization. This review delves into the distinctive features of each scheme, offering a comparative analysis. A specific focus is placed on the property of independence between state preparations and observable measurements in spacelike separated regions. Notably, the notion of localization in algebraic quantum field theory violates this independence due to the Reeh–Schlieder theorem. Drawing parallels with the quantum teleportation protocol, it is argued that causality remains unviolated. Additionally, we consider the nonrelativistic limit of quantum field theory, revealing the emergence of the Born scheme as the fundamental concept of localization. Consequently, the nonlocality associated with the Reeh–Schlieder theorem is shown to be suppressed under nonrelativistic conditions.

arXiv:2312.15348•Reviews in Physics•Jul 14, 2024•4 citations
It is argued that in his critique of standard nonrelativistic quantum mechanics Einstein formulated three requirements as necessary for a physical theory to be compatible with the field-theorectical paradigm, and it is shown that local, relativistic, algebraic quantum field theory typically satisfies those criteria—although, there are still open questions concerning the status of operational separability of quantum systems localized in spacelike separated space-time regions. It is concluded that local algebraic quantum field theory can be viewed as a research program that Einstein suggested informally in 1948 and that was realized only later in mathematical physics.
Main Claim I argue in this chapter that Einstein and von Neumann meet in algebraic relativistic quantum field theory in the following metaphorical sense: algebraic quantum field theory was created in the late 1950s/early 1960s and was based on the theory of “rings of operators,” which von Neumann established in 1935–1940 (partly in collaboration with J. Murray). In the years 1936–1949, Einstein criticized standard, nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, arguing that it does not satisfy certain criteria that he regarded as necessary for any theory to be compatible with a field theoretical paradigm. I claim that algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) does satisfy those criteria and hence that AQFT can be viewed as a theory in which the mathematical machinery created by von Neumann made it possible to express in a mathematically explicit manner the physical intuition about field theory formulated by Einstein. The argument in favor of this claim has two components: 1. Historical : An interpretation of Einstein's (semi)formal wordings of his critique of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. This interpretation results in mathematically explicit operational independence definitions, which, I claim, express independence properties of systems that are localized in causally disjoint spacetime regions. Einstein regarded these as necessary for a theory to comply with field theoretical principles. 2. Systematic : The presentation of several propositions formulated in terms of AQFT that state that the operational independence conditions in question do in fact typically hold in AQFT.
Entanglement has long been the subject of discussion by philosophers of quantum theory, and has recently come to play an essential role for physicists in their development of quantum information theory. In this paper we show how the formalism of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) provides a rigorous framework within which to analyze entanglement in the context of a fully relativistic formulation of quantum theory. What emerges from the analysis are new practical and theoretical limitations on an experimenter’s ability to perform operations on a field in one spacetime region that can disentangle its state from the state of the field in other spacelike-separated regions. These limitations show just how deeply entrenched entanglement is in relativistic quantum field theory, and yield a fresh perspective on the ways in which the theory differs conceptually from both standard nonrelativistic quantum theory and classical relativistic field theory. “...despite its conservative way of dealing with physical principles, algebraic QFT leads to a radical change of paradigm. Instead of the Newtonian view of a space-time filled with a material content one enters the reality of Leibniz created by relation (in particular inclusions) between ‘monads ’ (∼ the hyperfinite type III1 local von Neumann factors A(O) which as single algebras are nearly void of physical meaning) ” Schroer (1998, p. 302).
Nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is conceptually and mathematically simpler, and does, after all, work very well in a low-energy regime. Any solution of the measurement problem, or any account of the ontology of quantum theory, must yield sensible results in this regime, and so nonrelativistic quantum mechanics can serve as a testing ground for the viability of interpretations. On any approach, empirical adequacy requires recovery of at least an approximation to the quantum probabilities for outcomes of experiments, insofar as these have been verified by experiment. A quantum-mechanical theory is what results when one subjects a classical theory of a system with finitely many degrees of freedom to quantization. The task of extending additional beables theories to the context of quantum field theories remains a work in progress. A dynamical collapse theory modifies the evolution of the quantum state. Standard quantum theory predicts correlations between outcomes of spacelike separated experiments that violate Bell inequalities.
This paper surveys the issue of relativistic causality within the framework of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). In doing so, we distinguish various notions of causality formulated in the literature and study their relationships, and thereby we offer what we hope to be a useful taxonomy. We propose that the most direct expression of relativistic causality in AQFT is captured not (as has sometimes been claimed) by the spectrum condition but rather by the axiom of local primitive causality, in that it entails a form of local determinism for quantum fields which generalizes the constraint of no superluminal propagation of classical field theories to relativistic quantum field theory. We discuss the status of the axiom of micro-causality by locating its place within a large family of separability/independence/locality conditions developed for AQFT and also by relating it to so-called no-signalling theorems. And we also provide a critical survey of attempts to understand the implications for relativistic causality of the distant correlations endemic to the states in models of AQFT satisfying the standard axioms, and we provide an assessment of attempts to employ Reichenbach's common cause principle in AQFT to defuse worries that these distant correlations implicate direct causal connections between relatively spacelike events.
The axiomatic formulation of an Algebraic Relativistic Quantum Field Theory leads naturally -via the Haag-Kastler axioms- to the fact that operators representing observables generate a von Neumann algebra localized in a space-time region in which said observations are made. I present and explain the axioms, as well as the mathematical preliminaries needed to understand them and apply them to the so-called causal diamond and Fermi's Two-Atom System. The latter shows the importance of formulating axioms concerning causality that try to make compatible the requirement from Special Relativity according to which no causal influence can travel faster than the speed of light and the quantum mechanical theory of measurement and preparability of states. For a relativistic field-theoretic setting, these concepts must be re-formulated, and this reasoning suggests that the operator algebra must be a type III von Neumann factor. I also introduce some philosophical problems concerning our usual notion of causality from Hume to contemporary theories of counterfactual causation and show how the algebraic structure of the theory is deeply related to the causal one and how this theory can be extended if we change the way we think about causality, measurements, and local preparability of states.
We review the issue of localization in quantum field theory and detail the nonrelativistic limit. Three distinct localization schemes are examined: the Newton–Wigner, the algebraic quantum field theory, and the modal scheme. Among these, the algebraic quantum field theory provides a fundamental concept of localization, rooted in its axiomatic formulation. In contrast, the Newton–Wigner scheme draws inspiration from the Born interpretation, applying mainly to the nonrelativistic regime. The modal scheme, relying on the representation of single particles as positive frequency modes of the Klein–Gordon equation, is found to be incompatible with the algebraic quantum field theory localization. This review delves into the distinctive features of each scheme, offering a comparative analysis. A specific focus is placed on the property of independence between state preparations and observable measurements in spacelike separated regions. Notably, the notion of localization in algebraic quantum field theory violates this independence due to the Reeh–Schlieder theorem. Drawing parallels with the quantum teleportation protocol, it is argued that causality remains unviolated. Additionally, we consider the nonrelativistic limit of quantum field theory, revealing the emergence of the Born scheme as the fundamental concept of localization. Consequently, the nonlocality associated with the Reeh–Schlieder theorem is shown to be suppressed under nonrelativistic conditions.