Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics Letters

The Bell inequalities and the joint measurement of incompatible observables

Willem M. de Muynck, Willy De Baere, Hans Martens

Published Dec 1, 1992• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00665935

Related papers

Joint measurement of incompatible observables and the bell inequalities

Willem M. de Muynck, Hans Martens

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 1989•15 citations

Measurements Incompatible in Quantum Theory Cannot Be Measured Jointly in Any Other No-Signaling Theory

Michael M. Wolf, David Pérez-Garcı́a, Carlos García-Gutiérrez Fernández

It is well known that jointly measurable observables cannot lead to a violation of any Bell inequality--independent of the state and the measurements chosen at the other site. In this Letter we prove the converse: every pair of incompatible quantum observables enables the violation of a Bell inequality and therefore must remain incompatible within any other no-signaling theory. While in the case of von Neumann measurements it is sufficient to use the same pair of observables at both sites, general measurements can require different choices. The main result is obtained by showing that for arbitrary dimension the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality provides the Lagrangian dual of the characterization of joint measurability. This leads to a simple criterion for joint measurability beyond the known qubit case.

arXiv:0905.2998•Physical Review Letters•Dec 2, 2009•201 citations

Misinterpretations and Contradictions of Bell Inequalities

Andre Vatarescu

•Oct 24, 2026•0 citations

ARE BELL-TESTS ONLY ABOUT LOCAL INCOMPATIBILITY?

Diederik Aerts, Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi

The view exists that Bell-tests would only be about local incompatibility of quantum observables and that quantum non-locality would be an unnecessary concept in physics. In this note, we emphasize that it is not incompatibility at the local level that is important for the violation of Bell-CHSH inequality, but incompatibility at the non-local level of the joint measurements. Hence, non-locality remains a necessary concept to properly interpret the outcomes of certain joint quantum measurements.

arXiv:2006.08607•WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 1, 2023•1 citation

Bell’s inequalities and quantum measurement theory

Shasanka Mohan Roy

Pramana•Jul 1, 1993•3 citations

Qualitative equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality

Shiv Akshar Yadavalli, Nikola Andrejić, Ravi Kunjwal

Measurements in quantum theory can fail to be jointly measurable. Like entanglement, this incompatibility of measurements is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell inequalities. The (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph whose vertices denote measurements and hyperedges denote all and only compatible sets of measurements. Since incompatibility is necessary for a Bell violation, the joint measurability structure on each wing of a Bell experiment must necessarily be non-trivial, i.e., it must admit a subset of incompatible vertices. Here we show that for any non-trivial joint measurability structure with a finite set of vertices, there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation, i.e., given that Alice has access to this incompatible set of measurements, there exists a set of measurements for Bob and an entangled state shared between them such that they can jointly violate a Bell inequality. Hence, a non-trivial joint measurability structure is not only necessary for a Bell violation, but also sufficient.

arXiv:2008.10100•Aug 23, 2020•0 citations
It is well known that jointly measurable observables cannot lead to a violation of any Bell inequality--independent of the state and the measurements chosen at the other site. In this Letter we prove the converse: every pair of incompatible quantum observables enables the violation of a Bell inequality and therefore must remain incompatible within any other no-signaling theory. While in the case of von Neumann measurements it is sufficient to use the same pair of observables at both sites, general measurements can require different choices. The main result is obtained by showing that for arbitrary dimension the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality provides the Lagrangian dual of the characterization of joint measurability. This leads to a simple criterion for joint measurability beyond the known qubit case.
Measurements in quantum theory can fail to be jointly measurable. Like entanglement, this incompatibility of measurements is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell inequalities. The (in)compatibility relations among a set of measurements can be represented by a joint measurability structure, i.e., a hypergraph whose vertices denote measurements and hyperedges denote all and only compatible sets of measurements. Since incompatibility is necessary for a Bell violation, the joint measurability structure on each wing of a Bell experiment must necessarily be non-trivial, i.e., it must admit a subset of incompatible vertices. Here we show that for any non-trivial joint measurability structure with a finite set of vertices, there exists a quantum realization with a set of measurements that enables a Bell violation, i.e., given that Alice has access to this incompatible set of measurements, there exists a set of measurements for Bob and an entangled state shared between them such that they can jointly violate a Bell inequality. Hence, a non-trivial joint measurability structure is not only necessary for a Bell violation, but also sufficient.